Creation stands

[Josh1]

http://www.drdino.com/cse.asp?pg=truthradio#December


LOL, give it a listen, it might do you some good.



Josh

 

[toff]

http://www.drdino.com/cse.asp?pg=truthradio#December

LOL, give it a listen, it might do you some good.
Josh

No, it won't. Anything on Hovind's site will not do anyone any good. The man is a charlatan and a fraud.

 

[MaddyO3]

http://www.drdino.com/cse.asp?pg=truthradio#December


LOL, give it a listen, it might do you some good.



Josh

Kent Hovind doesn't know what he's talking about.

 

[the_malevolent_milk_man]

LOL... I won't be mean to you. If you seriously think Hovind is smart then there is no point in even starting a discussion.

 

[Arikay]

Yep your right and all barcodes contain 666 in them.

If I do listen to it, the question is, will you listen to me (or even be back) when I pick parts of it apart?

 

[Bushido216]

http://www.drdino.com/cse.asp?pg=truthradio#December


LOL, give it a listen, it might do you some good.



Josh

I actually watched one of his seminars once, front to back. That is an hour of my life that I will never have back.

 

[armed2010]

www.timecube.com has more credit than hovind does

 

[Josh1]

LOL, I knew I would get a fast response. Evos hate Kent, why do you think some ect..ect..(a lot) of evo professors wont debate him.

Josh

 

[toff]

LOL, I knew I would get a fast response. Evos hate Kent, why do you think some ect..ect..(a lot) of evo professors wont debate him.

Josh

They 'hate' him because he is a fraud and a charlatan. He continually uses the same points which have been refuted time and time again. And they won't debate him because they know that debate is not a forum for the discovery of scientific truth. If Hovind has some great science that will prove evolution wrong, let him publish it in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. Surprise, surprise, he hasn't done so.

 

[Arikay]

You didn't answer my question. If I listened to DrDino, and found false information, would you listen to what I had to write about it?

 

[Josh1]

Arikay : You didn't answer my question. If I listened to DrDino, and found false information, would you listen to what I had to write about it?


Sure, I will read it. I always read both sides, but don't post false stuff and give out a bunch of faulty websites. Many of them guys that make these websites don't know the first thing about what they are talking about.

I would also love to see someone defend their position in public. Evolutionist that agree to debate him get my respect, because at least they believe so strongly that they are willing to stand up for it. I will probally reply to anything else tomorrow. I am no science major, but I will read it if thats what you want to hear. I have never been accused of being closed minded(well maybe once,LOL).


Josh

 

[armed2010]

Arikay : You didn't answer my question. If I listened to DrDino, and found false information, would you listen to what I had to write about it?


Sure, I will read it. I always read both sides, but don't post false stuff and give out a bunch of faulty websites. Many of them guys that make these websites don't know the first thing about what they are talking about.

*irony meter EXPLODES*


Josh

 

[Arikay]

Thats good.

what consists of a faulty website?

What I would love is if DrDino would accept a written debate. Since he claims his work is science, he should have no problem accepting a written debate. The point for a written debate is that its slanted more towards science and evidence, where as a verbal debate is slanted more towards debating style and speaking ability.

Any one you would recomend I listen too?

Arikay : You didn't answer my question. If I listened to DrDino, and found false information, would you listen to what I had to write about it?


Sure, I will read it. I always read both sides, but don't post false stuff and give out a bunch of faulty websites. Many of them guys that make these websites don't know the first thing about what they are talking about.

I would also love to see someone defend their position in public. Evolutionist that agree to debate him get my respect, because at least they believe so strongly that they are willing to stand up for it. I will probally reply to anything else tomorrow. I am no science major, but I will read it if thats what you want to hear. I have never been accused of being closed minded(well maybe once,LOL).


Josh

 

[fcs25]

Hovind is a scientist on the same level as Donald Duck.His "proofs" are a laughting stock among "real" scientist.

 

[armed2010]

How dare you insult Donald Duck like that by comparing him to Hovind

 

[Bushido216]

Arikay : You didn't answer my question. If I listened to DrDino, and found false information, would you listen to what I had to write about it?


Sure, I will read it. I always read both sides, but don't post false stuff and give out a bunch of faulty websites. Many of them guys that make these websites don't know the first thing about what they are talking about.

I would also love to see someone defend their position in public. Evolutionist that agree to debate him get my respect, because at least they believe so strongly that they are willing to stand up for it. I will probally reply to anything else tomorrow. I am no science major, but I will read it if thats what you want to hear. I have never been accused of being closed minded(well maybe once,LOL).


Josh

You have us there! How dare the actual scientists beg for research grants so they can live a spartan life advancing a field of science they love versus making tons of money working on their debating skills and whipping otherwise ignorant crowds into a frenzy!

 

[ThePhoenix]

Sure, I will read it. I always read both sides, but don't post false stuff and give out a bunch of faulty websites. Many of them guys that make these websites don't know the first thing about what they are talking about.

My poor irony meter, how I miss you. You survived so much, but this just finished you off.

 

[Arikay]

It should be noted that since I have a slow connection, I randomly picked a recent one, and Dec 10 03 looked good.

 

[USincognito]

Sure, I will read it. I always read both sides, but don't post false stuff and give out a bunch of faulty websites. Many of them guys that make these websites don't know the first thing about what they are talking about.

I wonder if someone can do up a hubris meter for me?

Josh, please don't bear flase witness. It's clear from the fact that you're even posting a link to Hovind (unless this is a joke, and it appears not to be) that you're have read little if any of the scienctific side, nor of the pages and pages of evidence showing Kent Hovind is a liar and a charlatan.

I hope you're willing to take Arikay up and read the truth about Hovind's lies. Will you do so?

 

[toff]

Sure, I will read it. I always read both sides, but don't post false stuff and give out a bunch of faulty websites. Many of them guys that make these websites don't know the first thing about what they are talking about.

As others have pointed out, this is rather ironic - you talking about not giving out "faulty websites", when you start this whole thread off with Hovind's website...as 'faulty' a source as you can find.