Oncedeceived
Senior Veteran
Well I suppose but to claim the universe was eternal would go against all current scientific evidence. So it really is a moot point.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yes, so? That would be neither "nothing creating something" nor "something created something".
Wouldn't this suggest an eternal creator?
No. Why would you think it would?
It would suggest that there isn't even a beginning, so not at all.
Something?
No actually it doesn't because at this time we have no evidence of what came before the Big Bang. Creationists assume that there was nothing, but that is only an assumption. We don't know.Well I suppose but to claim the universe was eternal would go against all current scientific evidence. So it really is a moot point.
If the universe is eternal then something always existed. It simply changed forms.Maybe it doesn't. But if not, then an eternal nothing created something from nothing.
Well I suppose but to claim the universe was eternal would go against all current scientific evidence. So it really is a moot point.
Plants before the Cambrian evidence:
Yes. Another logically possible model would be a universe that has simply always existed. It would mean that everything wasn't created to begin with. There's not really evidence to support it, though. However, technically, anything that would hypothetically existed before the big bang would still be considered the universe, whether it was a cause, a deity, or neither... So in this case, the universe would have just always existed.
No actually it doesn't because at this time we have no evidence of what came before the Big Bang. Creationists assume that there was nothing, but that is only an assumption. We don't know.
If the universe is eternal then something always existed. It simply changed forms.
No fruit trees, no grasses, no flowering plants at all . . .
Also, they appear after the Sun.
It sure seems that something has always existed. The 'cause' of everything?
That does not follow. If the universe has always existed then the laws of physics have always existed.Fair enough but knowing the physics of our universe and the fact that they were not present until the universe came into being, it would have had to have a beginning.
What others? The multiverse hypothesis is still just that.It may be a part of a infinite cycle of universes but then what started the first universe that spawned ours and others?
Did these laws of physics exist when the universe was half-done @ the end of Day Three?If the universe has always existed then the laws of physics have always existed.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?