Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Correct. "I don't know"
Now the only claim I am asserting here is that you don't either.
I don't know either. I have evidence that supports my faith based position but evidence of the Creation is inaccessible to all.
So when it was thought that the universe could not have had any liquid present due to the high temps and it was used against the Bible's account, that was just using science against a passage proven incorrect; but when it is shown that there could be liquid it then is wrong because it is a fact after science discovered it. Right.
Evidence and faith don't go together in the same sentence. If you had evidence you wouldn't need faith.
Only God can create ex nihilo.Demonstrate that creating something ex nihilo is possible.
I think you have already proven the extent to which you will go to keep the biblical creation myth from being falsified.
Also, look at how many christians argue against the Big Bang theory. They even go as far as calling it atheistic, and against God's Word. You will certainly not find many christians from pre-1,000's that thought the Bible described a planet Earth that was billions of years old, or that life evolved from simpler life over hundreds of millions of years.
If the Bible accurately predicted what we would find, why did biblical scholars so vehemently object to what science found?
I have evidence that supports my faith based position but evidence of the Creation is inaccessible to all.
Do you ever find Scientists disagreeing with the findings in a study? I think that it is obvious people disagree about everything. That doesn't mean that there is no truth to be found.
That has to be the most condensed piece of pretzel logic you have produced yet.
You claim to have inaccessible evidence. You also claim to have faith. Let's wade through this mess.
If you have evidence, you don't need faith. Therefore, you are wrong right away. All you are trying to do is find some semblence of justification for your faith based beliefs.
However, as soon as you claim to have evidence you know that you will have to present it. This is where you invent the excuse of why you don't have to present evidence, and that reason is you don't have evidence.
This is why we keep saying that you are being deceptive.
I have yet to find a scientist who thinks that the phrase, "all of the creatures in the sea" does not include whales. In fact, I have yet to find a sane person who thinks that "all of the creatures in the sea" excludes whales simply because it does not specifically say "whales".
If there is truth, I doubt you will be the one to find it.
I've explained my position and you continue to twist the meaning. That is your problem not mine.
Who else can?Where in the Bible does it say so?
I presented evidence that you won't accept as usual.
Ok, so, no evidence then. Come back when you can participate in the challenge.
I am twisting the meaning? Me?
It would seem that the straightforward meaning of "all creatures in the sea" is that the author is referring to all the creatures in the sea, including whales since whales are creatures that live in the sea.
But no. . . that can't be correct, can it? Instead, you have to insanely twist words so that they mean the opposite of what they actually mean in order to contort the biblical creation myth into something that looks like the world around us. That is why your claims of evidence are worthless.
It doesn't take a Rhodes scholar to see that only God can create ex nihilo.Perhaps you missed the question, so I will ask again. Where in the Bible does it say that God is the only entity that can create things from nothing?
You don't have any evidence, BY YOUR OWN ADMISSION.
". . . but evidence of the Creation is inaccessible to all."--Oncedeceived
You are twisting my position. I am saying that the passage concerns the Cambrian period in which no whales existed.
To falsify that position would require that you prove that it is not discussing the Cambrian and what evidence you can give to support that position. Creation includes all periods of time from creation to the arrival of spiritual mankind.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?