Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The NIV makes the same mistake.I apologize.
Thanks for the reminder.
The NIV makes the same mistake.
Colossians 4:15 [KJV] Salute the brethren which are in Laodicea, and Nymphas, and the church which is in his house.
Colossians 4:15 [NIV] Give my greetings to the brothers and sisters at Laodicea, and to Nympha and the church in her house.
Google "uncaused cause"
No, the universe didn't "cause" anything to happen. Everything that is in the universe is a result of the nature of the universe.
How is that a mistake? The Greek word autos can be translated as either masculine or feminine. It is translated as "her" many times in the KJV of the New Testament. Seeing as how "her" in Col 4:15 is referring to Nymphas, a feminine noun, it makes sense to use the feminine pronoun.The NIV makes the same mistake.
Colossians 4:15 [KJV] Salute the brethren which are in Laodicea, and Nymphas, and the church which is in his house.
Colossians 4:15 [NIV] Give my greetings to the brothers and sisters at Laodicea, and to Nympha and the church in her house.
In your opinion maybe, but the universe has nothing in common with the common understanding of "God".Ok, read a few sites on "uncaused cause" and it seems that the conclusion would be that the universe would be an 'uncaused cause' for those who embrace the viewpoint that the universe is that from which everything proceeds but had no beginning. The universe is 'God', in other words.
Not according to this theory, no.The universe didn't cause the first life form to appear?
Now you know why I'm KJVO.How is that a mistake? The Greek word autos can be translated as either masculine or feminine. It is translated as "her" many times in the KJV of the New Testament. Seeing as how "her" in Col 4:15 is referring to Nymphas, a feminine noun, it makes sense to use the feminine pronoun.
There are quite a few translations that use "her" in that verse, and some even use "their". Other than your personal preference, what reason is there to believe the KJV is correct?
The grammar and such is different, but at least it's recognizable English, compared to something like Beowulf
Weirdly enough I don't find past versions of English that hard to read.
Good ... I'd hate to have to repeat myself.BTW, I notice you ignored my question.
Only to expose you guys' false accusation about Genesis 1 & 2.Except when it comes to Genesis 2:19. In that case you are NIV-O.
Only to expose you guys' false accusation about Genesis 1 & 2.
Only to expose you guys' false accusation about Genesis 1 & 2.
Only to expose you guys' false accusation about Genesis 1 & 2.
Just Genesis?Genesis 1 & 2 are horribly incorrect with known science.
Genesis can take a hike.
Just Genesis?
How about Matthew 28:6?
Fair enough.That has nothing to do with what we are discussing. Please try to stay on topic.
Good luck with that; 'ex nihilo' is either paradoxical or oxymoronic, or both - Ex nihilo nihil fit.Consider the claim that anything at all could be created ex nihilo is what I'm challenging, that's up to those who accept the challenge to figure out, not me.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?