Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Ok.Nobody was triggered into removing them, whatever that means.
The right seems to think it's an emergency!
The Esso to Exxon happened in the early 1970s. That was after the heyday of gasoline companies promotions. Esso had "Put a tiger in your tank" and a tiger mascot. I think at one point they had a pair of orange solid plastic boxing gloves with tiger stripes back when dingle-dangles on rearview mirrors was still a thing. Sinclair had a brontosaurus on their signs and gave away plastic model dinosaurs (which proved popular in local Elementary schools.) Gulf, circa 1960s, had plastic twin horseshoes for their "no-knocks" promotion. 76, owned by Phillips 66, had the orange antenna ball tips that was similar to their sign. Gulf also did a tie-in with Disney for a magazine and albums, but maybe the best Gulf swag was the book about the Apollo program called We Came in Peace, and punch-out cardboard models of the Lunar Excursion Module. All this was dying down by the early 1970s, and Esso was kind of a "blah" name, IIRC.Or Esso became Exxon
I grew up knowing some dear souls who resembled Aunt Jemima and who meant a lot to me. I still miss them. I heard people, black and white, talk in that dialect into the late 1990s, the last person being a greeter at Walmart. This is considered stereotype. It was back then, too, but maybe not so much when you knew people who resembled that corporate icon.Bring back the old logos!
As I said in another post, I grew up knowing people who resembled Aunt Jemma, people who meant a lot to me. And today we're told an image of people who looked like them should never have been put on a package. It's like their memory is being snuffed out. This, I suppose, is what's called progress.Those companies should have changed those old house-servant and fake indian themes. If liberals pressured them, then liberals were right.
Much of their clientele were people who don’t like change and were surprised when the company that they trusted not to change, changed. Now it’s changing back; the people who didn’t care, won’t have even noticed, probably.Those companies should have changed those old house-servant and fake indian themes. If liberals pressured them, then liberals were right.
But what does that have to do with Cracker Barrel? There is literally zero "woke" impulse behind their failed brand remodel.
Given that Cracker Barrel, like many companies, pays good money to hoist their sign up on tall poles where they can be seen from Interstates, everyone would definitely have noticed.Much of their clientele were people who don’t like change and were surprised when the company that they trusted not to change, changed. Now it’s changing back; the people who didn’t care, won’t have even noticed, probably.
This was basic seasoning levels of under-salting.Don't remember the issue with salt, but given the number of people who watch their sodium intake, it makes sense. You can put the salt in, but can't take it out.
Now, one breakfast at a Huddle House before the now grown kids were born, the grits served my wife and me had no salt, and the fried ham was too salty. So we'd take a bite of ham with a spoon full of grits.
Nobody has said that.As I said in another post, I grew up knowing people who resembled Aunt Jemma, people who meant a lot to me. And today we're told an image of people who looked like them should never have been put on a package.
Why doesn't she think Land O' Lakes should be able to make decisions about their own products?FWIW, my wife has American Indian ancestry and she considered removing the Indian maiden from Land O' Lake butter ridiculous twaddle.
Not an opinion, as I’ve clearly cited and you’re clearly unable to.Again, thanks for your opinion.
I literally just posted links that show that it had nothing to do with anybody finding them offensive.No. Those logos were considered offensive by some and were removed.
Quite frankly, NONE of this is a real issue.
Things change.
It's inevitable.
We have bigger fish to fry, quite frankly.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?