Dispensationalists....Do you believe that there are dual covenants or separate covenants?
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Dispensationalists....Do you believe that there are dual covenants or separate covenants?
Are the Covenants dual or separate in this present time? (I should have been more specific.)
That is an answer to another question but not to my question. Thanks anyway. However....God is not dealing with Israel as His special/favorite people being Israel, as a nation, rejected their King and His kingdom.
Being Israel today is in a "slumbering eyes" condition (Rom. 11:7-12:25) God has interrupted the prophetic program pertaining to the nation of Israel, created the "one new man", Jew and Gentile on equal footing, without distinction, and not under the Law, known today as the Church, the Body of Christ.
God has a new arrangement (covenant) with mankind to day. For all that will place their FAITH ALONE in the Cross work (death, burial, and resurrection - 1 Cor. 15:1-4) they will inherit an eternal heavenly home (cf. 2 Cor. 5:1 - Phil. 3:20).
God will again deal with Israel as His special/favorite people after the rapture of the Church, the Body of Christ. Then God will fulfill His covenants to Israel.
BigD said:God is not dealing with Israel as His special/favorite people being Israel, as a nation, rejected their King and His kingdom.
Being Israel today is in a "slumbering eyes" condition (Rom. 11:7-12:25) God has interrupted the prophetic program pertaining to the nation of Israel, created the "one new man", Jew and Gentile on equal footing, without distinction, and not under the Law, known today as the Church, the Body of Christ.
God has a new arrangement (covenant) with mankind to day. For all that will place their FAITH ALONE in the Cross work (death, burial, and resurrection - 1 Cor. 15:1-4) they will inherit an eternal heavenly home (cf. 2 Cor. 5:1 - Phil. 3:20).
God will again deal with Israel as His special/favorite people after the rapture of the Church, the Body of Christ. Then God will fulfill His covenants to Israel.
The Body of Christ is HIS Body. We are IN Him, seated IN HIM in Heaven, at the Father's right hand. We need no advocate, as HIS death, burial, and resurrection IN NEWNESS OF LIFE is ours, IN HIM.
We are His CO-heir. Those of those Jews and Gentiles lost from the calling of Paul in Acts 9 to the fulness of the Gentiles coming in, who have trusted his gospel of the UNcircumcision.
It is Israel, as His servant that had needed prior to their program's temporary interruption, and will need again, when said program is resumed: an advocate - until THEIR Fulness, when their Prophesied New Covenant is their reality (times of refreshing) and they THEN will no longer have need of an advocate, for they will all know Him, from the least to the greatest among them...
Danoh
Eph. 4:16
Danoh said:The Body of Christ is HIS Body. We are IN Him, seated IN HIM in Heaven, at the Father's right hand. We need no advocate, as HIS death, burial, and resurrection IN NEWNESS OF LIFE is ours, IN HIM.
We are His CO-heir. Those of those Jews and Gentiles lost from the calling of Paul in Acts 9 to the fulness of the Gentiles coming in, who have trusted his gospel of the UNcircumcision.
It is Israel, as His servant that had needed prior to their program's temporary interruption, and will need again, when said program is resumed: an advocate - until THEIR Fulness, when their Prophesied New Covenant is their reality (times of refreshing) and they THEN will no longer have need of an advocate, for they will all know Him, from the least to the greatest among them...
Danoh
Eph. 4:16
notreligus:
Mid-Acts folk are not at all Scriptural and are promoting error.
Matt 26:28for this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins.
BigD:
Matt. 26:28 "For this is my blood of the new testament (covenant) which is shed for many for the remission of sins."
Jesus said in Jeremiah 31:31 "Behold the day come, saith the Lord, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah".
Keep in mind that during the earthly ministry of Jesus He came only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel (cf. Matt. 15:24). The Gentile world was not part of that spoken covenant. In Hebrews 8, Jesus is speaking of that same covenant with the house of Israel, and the house of Judah. Israel will be under that covenant at His second coming.
I cannot find the Church, the Body of Christ, Jew and Gentile on equal footing, without distinction, and not under the Law, in the OT or Gospels. It appears to me that denominational Bible believers read future revelations into past events. IMHO, that is what creates denominations, and confusion. God is not the author of that confusion.
-----------
notreligus:
These Jews were part of the Body of Christ. The Jews AND Gentiles saved are in the Body of Christ, except they are no longer Jews and Gentiles. They are the Body, the Church. Mid-Acts folk make sure they keep mentioning them separately.
BigD:
Those Jews that believed in Jesus during His earthly ministry, and those saved prior to God giving Israel temporary slumbering eyes, are not members of the Body of Christ. They are kingdom saints that have an earthly kingdom to look forward to (cf. Jer. 23:5). They were saved under the preaching of "the gospel of the kingdom".
Members of the Church, the Body of Christ, have an eternal heavenly home to look forward to (cf. 2 Cor. 5:1, Phil. 3:20).
-------------
notreligus:
When Christ returns He will set up His permanent physical kingdom. "Jews and Gentiles" will not be separate. This is a manufactured belief of Mid-Acts folk and not anywhere in the Bible. Bad teaching is just bad teaching.
BigD:
In 1 Thess 4:13-18 we have the rapture of the Church, the Body of Christ, to heaven to "...ever be with the Lord" vs. 17. (again see 2 Cor. 5:1, Phil. 3:20). What part of those verses don't you understand?
-----------
notreligus:
You mentioned yourself that there was a Remnant and there remains a remnant. Teaching like you folk do is the same stuff from where John Hagee gets his separate covenant teaching which makes the claim that Jews who observe the Torah are saved. (Jews are not saved by the Law in any dispensation so that shows further ignorance.)
BigD:
PLEASE don't compare us with John Hagee. His beliefs are far from our views.
I am not to comment on what I deleted from you post because of your mis-understanding of the letter. (Don't have the time to write a book, or paint a picture for you.)
-----------
notreligus:
Christians need to realize that Dispensationalism, especially Mid-Acts/Ultra-Dispensationalism, is a system of Bible interpretation that was manufactured. The mystery is not a mystery. Paul told us that God envisioned the Church before the foundation of the world. God has stopped dealing with a nation and now deals with His people as individuals. The Old was made obsolete. Something that is obsoleted is not coming back.
BigD:
In Ephesians 2 we find 3 dispensations. In vs. 11 Paul mentions TIME PAST (how things used to be). In vss. 13-18 he speaks of BUT NOW, and in vs. 7 he speaks of "THE AGES TO COME". Further, in Col. 1:25, 26 he tells us that a dispensation of God which was given to him.
God had planned this present dispensation before creation, but He keep it a secret UNTIL He revealed it to the Apostle Paul.
In this dispensation of GRACE, the Law is of non-effect. However, after the rapture of the Church, the Body of Christ, "the gospel of the kingdom" and the Law will again be in effect. At the return of Jesus, Jesus will return as a righteous Judge. and there will be 12 disciples siting on 12 thrones judging the 12 tribes of Israel. (cf. Matt. 19:28).
Why would there be a need for a Judge, and Judges it there were no Laws?
notreligus:
Heb 8:13 In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.
BigD:
The OC was based upon the Laws of Moses for God instructions in righteousness for the nation of Israel.
In the NC, the Law will be written on their hearts, and they won't even have to be taught.
-----------
notreligus:
The Jews are not going to need another 1,000 years to study the Torah. The Mitzvoh, the 613, are not for salvation anyway. They are a national constitution for Israel! The Ten Commandments are the basis for the Sinaitic Covenant, which has been made obsolete.
BigD:
It will be written on their heats.
notreligus, In regards to the OC being replaced by the NC.
The OC in the OT is strickly to the nation of Israel. It primarily had to do with the promise God gave to Moses in Exodus 19:3-7, and the giving of the Law to Moses.
God gave the Law of Moses for instructions in righteous for the children of Israel. The Law was the guide for them to keep the Covenants. The Gentiles were never under the Law. If one was a Gentile and wanted to serve the true and living God of Israel, that one had to become a Jew (proselyte), and place themselves under the CIVIL, MORAL, and CEREMONIAL Laws of Moses.
Israel as a nation failed miserably in keeping the Law. During the earthly ministry of Jesus, He kept all the requirements of the Law for them. Therefore, the NC is based upon what Jesus did for them.
Yes, the OC is obsolete. It will be replaced by the NC, and is still with the house of Israel, and the house of Judah. Hebrews 8:10-13 spells it out. The Law will be written on their hearts.
This will happen at the end of the Tribulation at the 2nd coming of Jesus.
Where will I be at that time? In my eternal heavenly home.

I find it essentially impossible to have a discussion with a hyper/ultra-dispensational because they respond from their seemingly endless supply of cut-and-paste responses that I've already read and answered many times before. And each one covers too much territory, much of it not even related to the topic it supposedly covers. It requires more time than I have. I can't live here. And I don't have a large cut-and-paste supply to draw from. I write what I write at the time. I give it some thought but it's not pre-prepared and taken from a lot of other folk.
These positions are theologically weak and that is because they claim that the Old Mosaic/Sinaitic Covenant and the New Covenant are ontologically the same. They are not. I would ask that one who holds to these views explain why they would be the same in this regard.