The theory of uniformitarian geology proposes that the sedimentations identified by the geologic record have been laid down slowly and uniformly throughout the world over a period exceeding 1/2 billion years. Yet, at the same time the same theory proposes that globally non-uniform local meteorological conditions such as local floods were the cause of a large part of the sedimentation results found in to present geologic record.
If globally non-uniform local weather conditions such as local floods were the cause of a large part of the sedimentation results seem in an assumed or affirmed uniform, almost universal global stratification, how can such a condition be present in the record when non-universal, localized floods are said to be the primary cause of such a universal stratification record over a period that is supposed to represent 600,000,000 + years of time? (The geologic timetable proposed by evolution represented from beginning of cambrian through tertiary period)
If a consistent and uniform geologic column (geologic record) and its sedimentations exist world wide, then the meteorological conditions that caused that result had to consistent and simultaneous in order to cause such uniform global depositions.
Such climatic conditions are the type defined by the flood in Genesis 6-8. Yet the evolutionary uniformitarian geology theory will not accept the account of those conditions based on two areas of disagreement. One is that they reject the global flood condition presented in Genesis and claim that non-uniform global climatic conditions over a period of ½ billion years were one of the primary contributors to the result seen in the geology record today. Two, they reject the conditions of time presented in Genesis 6-8 to account for flood geology in he same way just the theory of biological evolution rejects the conditions of time in Genesis 1-2, based on the conclusions that life could not have appeared in that short period of TIME but had to have evolved slowly over some ½ billions years of time as well. Therefore, uniformatarian geology concludes that sedimentation was laid down slowly and uniformly throughout the world in every region and on every continent for ½ billion years as well.
Their belief in long ages of time is the central common driving force that requires that they approach to the interpretation of geologic evidence and biological evidence as it would fit into the predisposed conclusions of long ages of time. One of their arguments for such proposed long ages is the use of radiometric measurement techniques to determine the proposed dating of rocks.
Assuming, for a moment that radio, that metric dating is revealing the age of rock as being old, they fail to consider that the earth and its rock, if created as also defined in Genesis 1, would have had the appearance of age from their beginning. Therefore the appearance of age presented by radiometric dating would indicate measurements of age when in reality such apparent age is the result of having been created fully formed.
Therefore, the conclusion presented is that evolution rejects the proposed presentations of Genesis 1-2 and 6-8 because it rejects the consideration that the events presented could not have happened in short periods of time. They conclude that rocks could not have been made in a short period of time, that life could not have been made in a short period of time and that present global geology could not be the results of the Genesis. 6-8 universal global events that would have caused universal and consistently measurable effects as seen throughout geology because of its universal short period of duration.
What are the two founding pillars of modern evolution [ME]? They are the theory of biological evolution and the theory of uniformitarian geology. What have they rejected most universally about these Genesis accounts? They have rejected the propositions of what could have taken place in these accounts in the short periods of time that account for the results they presents. The first is found in Genesis 1-2, the second short period of time in 6-8. These are the two sections of Genesis that these two main pillars of ME challenge and most strongly propose to reject. These are the defining conditions of rejection of ME that began with Darwin and Lyell.
Therefore, it is a disbelief that supernatural causes that can result in such effects that are found to be the root of their rejection of the propositions found in this documentation. In the case of Genesis 1&2, if they believed such events were possible by such causes they would also conclude that their effects could have been created with the appearance of age .just as Adam undoubtedly had as defined in the account. In the case of Genesis 6-8, if they believed that a global flood of catastrophic proportion describe in the account could have occurred in the period of time describe (approx.360 days from beginning to the disembarking from the vessel of safety) it would be considered that the massive evidence of the immediate and catastrophic death defined by the fossil record and the scale of global geologic upheaval and displacement known today that could be accounted for by scale and magnitude describe in the globally defined event of Genesis 6-8. (information which, by the way, was not known at the time of the writing of the Genesis account.
Point: The global magnitude of the event disclosed in the account defines simultaneous total world-wide flood devastation conditions of catastrophic proportion. The writer had no knowledge that such geologic flood induced results, such as those defined in the geologic record, existed when this account was written. Yet he wrote an account that describes the scale of death defined by that record today. In addition, the Genesis account of the flood is the only ancient account of flooding that attributes its magnitude to conditions that reached total and global proportions that covered the whole earth as its topography existed at that time.).
Time, therefore, which is ultimately defined by the speed of light in the physical universe, would present no constraint to the One who is also presented in Genesis as having created the light that defines time ,and therefore initiated the time these accounts present. It is therefore a gross oversight to assume that the information in these chapters of Genesis are false, allegorical, mystical or non-literal because the time presented will not allow for such events and their effects to take place, when in actuality time and events present no barrier to the One who, in the first place, . created time. ( "In the beginning" ....).
-----------------
If globally non-uniform local weather conditions such as local floods were the cause of a large part of the sedimentation results seem in an assumed or affirmed uniform, almost universal global stratification, how can such a condition be present in the record when non-universal, localized floods are said to be the primary cause of such a universal stratification record over a period that is supposed to represent 600,000,000 + years of time? (The geologic timetable proposed by evolution represented from beginning of cambrian through tertiary period)
If a consistent and uniform geologic column (geologic record) and its sedimentations exist world wide, then the meteorological conditions that caused that result had to consistent and simultaneous in order to cause such uniform global depositions.
Such climatic conditions are the type defined by the flood in Genesis 6-8. Yet the evolutionary uniformitarian geology theory will not accept the account of those conditions based on two areas of disagreement. One is that they reject the global flood condition presented in Genesis and claim that non-uniform global climatic conditions over a period of ½ billion years were one of the primary contributors to the result seen in the geology record today. Two, they reject the conditions of time presented in Genesis 6-8 to account for flood geology in he same way just the theory of biological evolution rejects the conditions of time in Genesis 1-2, based on the conclusions that life could not have appeared in that short period of TIME but had to have evolved slowly over some ½ billions years of time as well. Therefore, uniformatarian geology concludes that sedimentation was laid down slowly and uniformly throughout the world in every region and on every continent for ½ billion years as well.
Their belief in long ages of time is the central common driving force that requires that they approach to the interpretation of geologic evidence and biological evidence as it would fit into the predisposed conclusions of long ages of time. One of their arguments for such proposed long ages is the use of radiometric measurement techniques to determine the proposed dating of rocks.
Assuming, for a moment that radio, that metric dating is revealing the age of rock as being old, they fail to consider that the earth and its rock, if created as also defined in Genesis 1, would have had the appearance of age from their beginning. Therefore the appearance of age presented by radiometric dating would indicate measurements of age when in reality such apparent age is the result of having been created fully formed.
Therefore, the conclusion presented is that evolution rejects the proposed presentations of Genesis 1-2 and 6-8 because it rejects the consideration that the events presented could not have happened in short periods of time. They conclude that rocks could not have been made in a short period of time, that life could not have been made in a short period of time and that present global geology could not be the results of the Genesis. 6-8 universal global events that would have caused universal and consistently measurable effects as seen throughout geology because of its universal short period of duration.
What are the two founding pillars of modern evolution [ME]? They are the theory of biological evolution and the theory of uniformitarian geology. What have they rejected most universally about these Genesis accounts? They have rejected the propositions of what could have taken place in these accounts in the short periods of time that account for the results they presents. The first is found in Genesis 1-2, the second short period of time in 6-8. These are the two sections of Genesis that these two main pillars of ME challenge and most strongly propose to reject. These are the defining conditions of rejection of ME that began with Darwin and Lyell.
Therefore, it is a disbelief that supernatural causes that can result in such effects that are found to be the root of their rejection of the propositions found in this documentation. In the case of Genesis 1&2, if they believed such events were possible by such causes they would also conclude that their effects could have been created with the appearance of age .just as Adam undoubtedly had as defined in the account. In the case of Genesis 6-8, if they believed that a global flood of catastrophic proportion describe in the account could have occurred in the period of time describe (approx.360 days from beginning to the disembarking from the vessel of safety) it would be considered that the massive evidence of the immediate and catastrophic death defined by the fossil record and the scale of global geologic upheaval and displacement known today that could be accounted for by scale and magnitude describe in the globally defined event of Genesis 6-8. (information which, by the way, was not known at the time of the writing of the Genesis account.
Point: The global magnitude of the event disclosed in the account defines simultaneous total world-wide flood devastation conditions of catastrophic proportion. The writer had no knowledge that such geologic flood induced results, such as those defined in the geologic record, existed when this account was written. Yet he wrote an account that describes the scale of death defined by that record today. In addition, the Genesis account of the flood is the only ancient account of flooding that attributes its magnitude to conditions that reached total and global proportions that covered the whole earth as its topography existed at that time.).
Time, therefore, which is ultimately defined by the speed of light in the physical universe, would present no constraint to the One who is also presented in Genesis as having created the light that defines time ,and therefore initiated the time these accounts present. It is therefore a gross oversight to assume that the information in these chapters of Genesis are false, allegorical, mystical or non-literal because the time presented will not allow for such events and their effects to take place, when in actuality time and events present no barrier to the One who, in the first place, . created time. ( "In the beginning" ....).
-----------------