Interestingly the Eastern Orthodox do not practice Eucharist Devotion in the Roman Catholic manner, despite also reserving the Eucharist, and having presanctified liturgies in Lent and Holy Week (but not on Good Friday), the text of which closely resembled that of the Roman Rite before Pope Pius XII rewrote the Presanctified Mass in 1955 (to the extent that the Eastern Orthodox credit Pope Gregory I, St. Gregory Dialogos as he is known to Orthodox Christians, also known to Catholics and high church Protestants as St. Gregory the Great, who had been a legate of the Roman Church to Constantinople for several years in his youth and was also responsible for sending St. Augustine of Canterbury to Britain to convert the Angles and provide leadership to the isolated British churches, and for providing civil government after the Ostrogoths sacked Rome around 600 and the secular authorities collapsed).
This is one of many instances where Lutheran and Orthodox practice is very similiar.
One of the more striking differences, indeed probably the only really striking difference, is like the Roman Catholic Church, most Lutherans believe that the Real Change of the bread and wine into the body and blood of our Lord occurs with the Words of Institution, whereas the Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox and the Church of the East believe it happens with the Epiklesis, a prayer invoking the Holy Spirit and asking the Holy Spirit to cause the gifts to become the Body and Blood of our Lord. In contrast to Roman Catholic liturgies, many Lutheran liturgies, but not all (for example, those in the 1978
Lutheran Book of Worship or the version of the Divine Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom used by the Ukrainian Lutheran Church) lack an epiklesis, whereas the ancient Liturgy of Addai and Mari, used by the Assyrian Church of the East, lacks a clearly defined institution narrative, and some Syriac Orthodox liturgies have an Institution Narrative that describes the Words of Institution rather than directly quoting them.
I really love Lutheranism, being of Scandinavian and German descent, although I also love Eastern and Oriental Orthodoxy, Anglicanism, the Church of the East, Methodism and Roman Catholicism. Basically any traditional church with a strong sacramental theology and a focus on liturgical beauty I am all over. Thus my great affection for the ecumenical Traditional Theology forum we have here on CF.com.
By the way, the LCMS publishes two of the best hymnals around, the 1941 Lutheran Hymnal and the 2006 Lutheran Service Book. I think
@MarkRohfrietsch recently mentioned to me something about a new traditional language version of the Lutheran Service Book. There is a new WELS hymnal coming out soon which I am looking forward to adding to my collection. I also love the 1959 Lutheran Hymnal and Service Book, published by the ALC, which I believe is sadly disused, although if anyone knows of a parish still using it, I would like to hear about it; this hymnal was the first English language Lutheran hymnal to introduce the Litany of Peace, which is used at the start of the Eastern Orthodox Divine Liturgy and several other services. There is also a new WELS hymnal coming out which I am looking forward to adding to my collection. I also like the 1978 Lutheran Book of Worship but I did not like the 2006 hymnal published by the ELCA, the name of which escapes me.
All of the Lutheran hymnals in English are based at least in part on The Common Service, which was an adaptation of the text of the American (Protestant Episcopal) Book of Common Prayer for Lutheran use, so the public domain 1917 Evangelical Lutheran Hymnary published by the ELS, and the 1941 Lutheran Hymnal published by LCMS, which is still in use in some LCMS and WELS parishes (and possibly some Methodist ones - I noticed it was being sold on Cokesbury alongside the 1989 Methodist hymnal, which I am not a huge fan of compared to its 1965 predecessor, and Cokesbury is known for being a Methodist-oriented vendor of ecclesiastical supplies; they sell very useful reversible stoles, a green and violet stole and a red and white stole, which are useful for field work and chaplaincy, although I regret the lack of reversible stoles in black, gold, blue and rose, which would provide a full set of liturgical colors and also meet the needs of Lutherans and Anglicans who use Sarum Blue in Advent as well as those who use blue on Marian feasts, but it is a Methodist supply house after all, and expecting a complete set of colors in inexpensive reversible stoles is obviously unrealistic).
Of the historic Lutheran hymnals I have seen, the most idiosyncratic and interesting was from the 1940s, published by the Augustana Synod, which is near and dear to me as a Swedish American, in part because by Morfar spent most of his career with them, and then with the LCA, retiring around the same time as ELCA came to be.
And I have a deep affinity for the LCMS as I spent much of my childhood as a member of that church and spent most of my school years in an LCMS parochial school. Those were some happy times.
By the way, here is an interesting link on the history of Lutheran hymnals that I just stumbled across:
Holy Art Thou: The Service Book and Hymnal (1958)