Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Actually I do.
Just not your kind.
The public school systems, general education, scientists who push agenda over fact, and pastors who decided to throw aside the book Genesis in order to submit to peer pressure instead of focusing on facts.
Then it can take a hike.There is no 'my kind' or 'your kind' of science. It's just science. And you just don't like what it tells you.
You've heard of a one-world government coming?Are you suggesting a world-wide global conspiracy of some kind? Because those are always good for a laugh.
Then it can take a hike.
I don't respect science that doesn't respect the word of God.
Then it can take a hike.
I don't respect science that doesn't respect the word of God.
Are you suggesting a world-wide global conspiracy of some kind? Because those are always good for a laugh.
Then you shouldn't respect heliocentrism or the earth being round, because those both contradict super-literal interpretations of the Bible.
Actually that's incorrect.
Not really. They may not contradict your interpretation or mine, but they certainly contradict many people's. Should I point you to all of the flat earthers we've had on this board?
Maybe instead, you should learn to respect figures of speech.Then you shouldn't respect heliocentrism or the earth being round, because those both contradict super-literal interpretations of the Bible.
Sure. I'm guessing we've had 1 or 2 flat eathers. I also know people who don't believe in the bible who believe in the flat earth. I would like you to quote me scripture that actually says the earth is flat.
Maybe instead, you should learn to respect figures of speech.
Psalm 91:4a He shall cover thee with his feathers,
A 'super-literal' interpretation says YES.
But as literal as I am with the word of God, I don't think even you would say I believe God has feathers.
I would if I thought God started His autobiography off with a figure of speech; but the way Genesis 1 is written tells me it is literal.Exactly. Now apply that same reasoning to a literal 6-day creation.
I would if I thought God started His autobiography off with a figure of speech; but the way Genesis 1 is written tells me it is literal.
For one thing, Genesis 1 would be one LONG figure of speech.
Too long, in my opinion.
For another, it uses ordinal numbers and specific terminology.
For another, the Bible always alerts the reader to something that isn't literal, and Genesis 1 has no references to it as being anything other that literal.
In the beginning. ≠ Once upon a time.
Take this article in TechTimes, Massive Genetic Study Reveals 90 Percent Of Earth’s Animals Appeared At The Same Time. The title alone is creationist clickbait, and the author of the story clearly didn’t understand the article at all. She gets it all wrong.
...
It’s a bit like reading a statement that almost all people are less than 100 years old, and then wondering, publicly and in print, about what happened in 1918 to cause every human being on Earth to have been suddenly born in that year. That must have been some orgy to celebrate the end of the Great War.
No it doesn't at all.
You are just the blind who believe in every little piece of misinformation out there that goes in the direction of evolution. But none of it proves evolution.
You want to know that God made things according to his semblance? That the fundamental nature of life is built up in Christ? The rainbow is the sign for the manifold wisdom of God in all its creation. The fact that life is similar to itself is NO premise for evolution but is rather the fingerprints of God and we are the top of the complexity order in the seamless transition of life that God has made. The seamlessness of the rainbow testifies to the immutable nature of creation that all of it works together and this is spiritually discerned but you will have none of it because you will not ask God for help when you know you need it. God is able to show you. Just tell me why it was that Christ wore a seamless tunic? What is the reason that he wore something without seams? This very thing points to the immutable seamless creation and you want to say that because life has no seams then it must have happened all by itself! When that very reason you make for evolution is the very pointing of the glory of God!
God made life seamless.
That is wrong - the paper is was peer reviewed, published and the scientific community has read it. Some "media" basically lied about the paper which is not abut any problems with evolution. The paper is an analysis of how evolution produced new DNA variability within species during the last 200,00o years.And sadly the media and the scientific community will ignore this
Gender is the range of characteristics pertaining to, and differentiating between, masculinity and femininity. Depending on the context, these characteristics may include biological sex (i.e., the state of being male, female, or an intersex variation), sex-based social structures (i.e., gender roles), or gender identity.[1][2][3] People who do not identify as men or women or with masculine or feminine gender pronouns are often grouped under the umbrella terms non-binary or genderqueer. Some cultures have specific gender roles that are distinct from "man" and "woman," such as the hijras of South Asia. These are often referred to as third genders.
1. It is hard to understand how anyone could make this claim, since anything mutations can do, mutations can undo. Some mutations add information to a genome; some subtract it. Creationists get by with this claim only by leaving the term "information" undefined, impossibly vague, or constantly shifting. By any reasonable definition, increases in information have been observed to evolve.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?