It isn't that conservatives "can't understand" this sort of argumentation. Rather, it is that the argumentation doesn't even speak to the genuine concern of conservatives.
I understand the genuine concern of conservatives, and contrary to your assertion, that OP's comments
do address them - or, they at least address some of them. No, his comments don't address
all of conservatives' concerns, but they do address an important point about the efficacy certain strategies with respect to achieving their alleged ends. And on that point, he's correct. Of the respondents in the thread, you were the only one I saw who tried to argue that the concerns were broader than that - everyone else took the typical right-wing response of incoherently shouting "baby killer!".
Okay, so people have the right to be bigots up until they become inconvenient? I'm not sure that's how rights work. Either people have the right to be bigots on their private property or they don't.
It depends on how you define "private property" - that can mean a lot of things in the US.
In the 1960's, we worked out a compromise - you can be a bigot on your private property if it's truly private. However, if your private property (i.e. privately-owned property) is somehow open to the public (e.g. you have customers or employees), then you can't be a bigot.
]
While I appreciate your perspective, it literally has nothing to do with that I said. Conservatives are not the ones physically assaulting people and burning down cities. Leftists are. As someone who identifies with none of the groups in play right now, I can safely say Con Inc are not the ones who need to police themselves.
This thread is about conservatives being painted as racists - my original comment was addressed towards that concern. Your comment about burning down cities was, effectively, a sarcastic whataboutism used as a weak rebuttal to my original comment. That the left could use its own housecleaning (a sentiment with which I agree, btw, though probably not to the degree to which you do) does not negate the right's need for one.
And yes, cons are physically assaulting people, too. So are police in some cases. Want video?