Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Not sure I understand your question.So what is the view of the MJ sect concerning that future anti-christ [which btw was written more than 2000yr ago
Examples of "Law" having three meanings in Scripture would be:examples...
Examples of "Law" having three meanings in Scripture would be:
Mt 5:19; Lk 2:24; Jn 7:51 = Mosaic law
Lk 10:26, 24:44; Mt 11:13, 12:5 = the Pentateuch
Jn 10:34, 12:34, 15:25, 7:49 (cf v.42) = the whole OT
Context should be the basis.I know very well of these three uses you are describing.
The question I'm asking is...HOW are you choosing/deciding to use the "OT" card, instead of the Law of God card?
What proof or basis do you have for choosing A instead of B+C...
Originally Posted by LittleLambofJesus
So what is the view of the MJ sect concerning that future anti-christ [which btw was written more than 2000yr ago
So both and your Jewish Denomination claim ignorance about that character.Not sure I understand your question.
What 'MY' personal view of this person is only what Scripture has disclosed about him...
Context should be the basis.
Nice dodgeAre you missing words in the sentence? My denomination claim ignorance? what?
LLOJ...i literally have no idea what you are talking about.Nice dodge
Well, I'm not wed to that choice.I understand the above Clare...
My question is...what makes you say that Psalm 1 is talking about the "OT" and not the Law of God?
Tell me why David would not be speaking about delighting in the Law of God...
(I understand that you wouldn't agree that it is possible to DELIGHT in the Holy Law of God as a believer...but I just want to know on what basis do you choose 1, 2 or 3)
How much more simple can I put it?LLOJ...i literally have no idea what you are talking about.
You should know by now that I don't usually dodge any of your questions.
If you could rephrase it in a way that I understand, I'll certainly answer it.
Originally Posted by LittleLambofJesus
So what is the view of the MJ sect concerning that future anti-christ [which btw was written more than 2000yr ago]
Well, I'm not wed to that choice.
But my "delight" is the "word of God," the whole OT.
How much more simple can I put it?
Well, I'm not wed to that choice.
But my "delight" there is in the "word of God," the whole OT, which is also the way I see Ps 119, one of my favorites.
Nah, that is ok [and off topic for this thread].This is one of the vaguest questions ever.
Are you asking me what my view of the Anti-Christ is?
As in what I think about him...what I think he'll do...when will he show up?
What specifically are you looking for?
Do you want me to go look up all the passages that speak about him and quote em for you?
No Tall73, not failed, simply went to bed, after a really long and tiring day of out of doors labour. Therefore, please have patience, when time allows for proper response it will be given.it looks like you failed to address the post I made.
I assume you mean Ellen White talking about those who left the Advent movement being among its harshest critics.
Newsflash. That was hardly prophetic. They were already doing it in her day because some of the doctrines didn't add up.
However, am I your enemy because I am discussing the Scriptures with you? Did I not say I am still studying it? I was willing to change my views before, and if convinced will again.
Nah, that is ok [and off topic for this thread].
[I am well aware of the passages both the sabbatarian/anti-Sunday MJs and SDAs are talking about]
Perhaps I will create a thread on GT for the MJs [and SDAs] to give their view of that character.
As Moses came down from Mount Sinai with the two tablets of the commandments in his hands, he did not know that the skin of his face had become radiant while he conversed with the LORD. When Aaron, then, and the other Israelites saw Moses and noticed how radiant the skin of his face had become, they were afraid to come near him. Only after Moses called to them did Aaron and all the rulers of the community come back to him. Moses then spoke to them. Later on, all the Israelites came up to him, and he enjoined on them all that the LORD had told him on Mount Sinai. When he finished speaking with them, he put a veil over his face. Whenever Moses entered the presence of the LORD to converse with him, he removed the veil until he came out again. On coming out, he would tell the Israelites all that had been commanded. Then the Israelites would see that the skin of Moses' face was radiant; so he would again put the veil over his face until he went in to converse with the LORD.
(Exodus 34:29-35)
Now if the ministry of death, carved in letters on stone, was so glorious that the Israelites could not look intently at the face of Moses because of its glory that was going to fade, how much more will the ministry of the Spirit be glorious? For if the ministry of condemnation was glorious, the ministry of righteousness will abound much more in glory. Indeed, what was endowed with glory has come to have no glory in this respect because of the glory that surpasses it. For if what was going to fade was glorious, how much more will what endures be glorious.
(2 Corinthians 3:7-11)
Look and see ...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?