- Jun 26, 2004
- 17,499
- 3,776
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Protestant
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- CA-Others
Do you believe the Reformed confessions teach Conditionalism?
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
In my experience with Primitve Baptists they believe in what they call time salvation which is conditioned upon joining the church. Of courese they also believe that eternal salvation comes to the elect whether they ever hear the Gospel of Christ or not.Another from a forum:
Conditional time salvation divorces justification in time from eternal justification, which is no gospel at all. Unless time-salvation is in full and perfect harmony with salvation transcendent of time, we are of all men most miserable!
I had a hard time finding a clear definition. When I googled it I found a lot of fuss and fighting going on and a lot of name calling. I did find this definition from a forum that I think does a good job:
Conditional time salvationists teach salvation in time (experiential justification or justification in the court of the conscience) is by works.
Ah, you have to watch out for those Primitive Baptists. You don't want to succumb to their barefoot, cave-dwelling, drum-beating, spear-throwing ways.
I would make the joke even if I were Primitive Baptist myself.
Yeah, unfortunately it's not as ridiculous to picture Presbyterians running around with icons and onion domes. Especially since that's become a reality with Federal Vision.
Do you believe the Reformed confessions teach Conditionalism?
We all share the same plain black suit. I get it in three weeks.I can't think of a joke for the OPC.
Um, yeah.Well, to get everyone back on topic... As I read it in some online discussions, it's hard to get a handle on what conditionalism is. Like, there are some people who talk about mere assurance of salvation from good works, but there are other people who talk about real salvation by good works. But I can be sure of one thing: the WCF says zip-all about any "time salvation."
That's not the definition of conditionalism.I had a hard time finding a clear definition. When I googled it I found a lot of fuss and fighting going on and a lot of name calling. I did find this definition from a forum that I think does a good job:
Conditional time salvationists teach salvation in time (experiential justification or justification in the court of the conscience) is by works.