Right, and I certainly agree. But my point is that too often, religiously liberal is taken to mean politically liberal as well..when that needn't be the case at all.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
She supports the legality of it, not the act of doing it, and she would never get an abortion for herself. As for the gay marriage, I believe straight people have NO right to comment on it until the straight divorce rate is down below 40 percent. Let the gays marry, so that straights use their lower divorce rate as a sign to fix their ways.I see. You support murder, but you're against murder? Or, you support a woman's choice to murder her unborn child, but you're against murder of an unborn child? I don't quite understand that. If you support gay marriage, why does the gay church leader have to be celibate? All he/she needs is a "loving" partner. I see marriage as a declaration of love.
I cannot respect this coming from someone who is not a full-blown anarchist. Anarchists are crazy, but at least an anarchist with this belief would be consistent. It makes no sense to tolerate some murder as legal and keep other murder illegal.She supports the legality of it, not the act of doing it, and she would never get an abortion for herself.
She supports the legality of it, not the act of doing it, and she would never get an abortion for herself. As for the gay marriage, I believe straight people have NO right to comment on it until the straight divorce rate is down below 40 percent. Let the gays marry, so that straights use their lower divorce rate as a sign to fix their ways.
I'm more conservative than CoG is, but I, like her, don't really support theocratic laws. They push people away from Christianity. Countries where Christianity is growing the most (African countries, China, India, etc) have anything but Christian-friendly laws.
Should everything that is a sin, be illegal?I cannot respect this coming from someone who is not a full-blown anarchist. Anarchists are crazy, but at least an anarchist with this belief would be consistent. It makes no sense to tolerate some murder as legal and keep other murder illegal.
I cannot respect this coming from someone who is not a full-blown anarchist. Anarchists are crazy, but at least an anarchist with this belief would be consistent. It makes no sense to tolerate some murder as legal and keep other murder illegal.
No problem, always my pleasure to helpThanks for responding. I had a big long one and then my internet cut out and I didn't feel like going over the whole thing again.
Well, for us as Christians, it is. We have a righteous judge to answer for you know. Expecting it from the world is delusional though. But abortion is the taking of lives, our country should not cater to such a sin. Honestly, if a woman is forced to back alley abortions, it'd mean less death, right? (It's not a large amount that would be that desperate..) One's view of gay marriage is highly dependent on their views of gay sex. I think gay sex is a sin, and marriage is pretty much the "OK" to have sex, so why even bother? I don't plan to get married myself and I'm straight so I won't forcibly oppose it since those who will sin in that way won't care about marriage anyway. (That being said, I think those who oppose gay adoption are foolish.) :/ We should employ the message that Jesus accepts the sinner, the church (Not the ONE TRUE CHURCH) but the church accepts sinners too, but through God, we don't stay that way, if someone wants their sin over God.. then they should leave..Should everything that is a sin, be illegal?
Well, for us as Christians, it is.
I'm talking when they are already in the church. Witnessing isn't my strong point, I don't really know how I would get an unbeliever to believe (Let's leave that to God..), I don't want to cut out the truth and preach a false gospel. What is the line of "sharing" and "forcing"? I wish I could share my faith (boldly..) to others, but i'm a coward. ><;
Almost your entire post was a non-response to the question I asked: should all sins be against the law?Well, for us as Christians, it is. We have a righteous judge to answer for you know. Expecting it from the world is delusional though. But abortion is the taking of lives, our country should not cater to such a sin. Honestly, if a woman is forced to back alley abortions, it'd mean less death, right? (It's not a large amount that would be that desperate..) One's view of gay marriage is highly dependent on their views of gay sex. I think gay sex is a sin, and marriage is pretty much the "OK" to have sex, so why even bother? I don't plan to get married myself and I'm straight so I won't forcibly oppose it since those who will sin in that way won't care about marriage anyway. (That being said, I think those who oppose gay adoption are foolish.) :/ We should employ the message that Jesus accepts the sinner, the church (Not the ONE TRUE CHURCH) but the church accepts sinners too, but through God, we don't stay that way, if someone wants their sin over God.. then they should leave..
To go to such lengths, they will answer for it.Almost your entire post was a non-response to the question I asked: should all sins be against the law?
And your view that back alley abortions would be uncommon is very wrong. Women who are desperate enough to go for an abortion in the first place, would either go that route, or force themselves to miscarry.
I suppose your personal interpretations of scripture, what is to be taken literally? What is not to be taken literally? (Besides the obvious parables..) Gay Marriage, Pre-Marital Sex.Sorry I misunderstood. What was I talking about that would go against the church? And don't mention the political stuff, we're talking religious stuff now.
I suppose your personal interpretations of scripture, what is to be taken literally? What is not to be taken literally? (Besides the obvious parables..) Gay Marriage, Pre-Marital Sex.
np!I'll answer when I have more time
In a perfect society they wouldn't need to be against the law, because we just wouldn't do them. But society will never be perfect, of course.To go to such lengths, they will answer for it.
Against the law? In a perfect society, yes. In ours, it's but a dream.