Bafflingly enough, conservative think tanks who feel that any change to the status quo would endanger their future profits
Hmm...what does this have to do with the subject? Seems like a rant followed by a sweeping generalization meant to poison readers from listening to all explanations of the data.
Surely propaganda of this sort is NOT what is called for and perhaps a big part of why people are not listening!
Global Warming (opps...I meant "Climate Change"), has been front and center of our discussions since the mid-1990s. However, we have seen a liberal media misrepresent scientific data over and over again in support of their agenda.
We have seen Liberals Environmentalists like Al Gore who in their private lives are the biggest carbon abusers on the planet. So forgive our skepticism, but it has been well-earned by liberal propaganda.
That aside in future post I recommend a more specific argument. Namely, "climate change is a both a direct result of human activity (industrialization) and is so fine-tuned to be at a tipping point that will cause massive destruction to the human population and human enterprise.
Because everyone agrees that climate change has been happening for 4.6B years on Earth.
Causal analysis is the smoking gun.
In fact the data would support your more fine-tuned argument (i.e. man-made cause as opposed to normal natural fluctuation).
The verdict of the scientific community (i.e. people who deal with these matters professionally and have all the data at hand) is virtually unanimous
Again, needs more specificity. Allows equivocation as to what scientists agree on.
how does your religion relate to the devastating effect our post-industrial species has on the planet, and what does it have to say about combating the mess we've created?
Here the tone is derogatory. What does your _________ (fill in belief system or worldview here) say about ________.
"How does the Christian worldview engage the idea of stewardship for the planet, if it does?"
Notice how the tone is different.
1554, John Calvin had interpreted dominion to mean a responsible care and keeping that does not neglect, injure, abuse, degrade, dissipate, corrupt, mar, or ruin the earth.
http://www.equip.org/article/christ...hould-christians-think-about-the-environment/
Calvin DeWitt and Robert Nash give a list of 5 differing views by Christians on the environment.
It highlights the good, bad, and ugly, and an alternative. Enjoy.