Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
General Political Discussion
claiming "undeniable proof the election was stolen and the courts ignored it" is NOT sedition?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hedrick" data-source="post: 75672783" data-attributes="member: 239032"><p>The issue isn't fraud. There's no significant amount of fraud and everyone knows it. Rather, many states loosened rules to help during the epidemic. You can argue that some of those changes weren't legal. That's the only legitimate legal argument, not actual fraud. The cases that were thrown out mostly claimed that whole classes of voters voted in improper ways, and that their votes should be thrown out. The problem is that no judge is going to throw out the votes of people who followed the rules as they were told. </p><p></p><p>It's possible that courts will consider these arguments, and decide that in fact some states did allow voting that they shouldn't have. That would affect future elections. Indeed even without court decisions, some Republican states are trying to make sure the rules are tighter next time. Apparently everyone, including Trump, thinks that if everyone votes, Republicans lose. I was pleased to find that Republican officials are not willing to fudge counts. But that doesn't mean they want it to happen again. Several Republican states are going to try to restrict voting. Democrats are going to try to pass voting rights laws to prevent this.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hedrick, post: 75672783, member: 239032"] The issue isn't fraud. There's no significant amount of fraud and everyone knows it. Rather, many states loosened rules to help during the epidemic. You can argue that some of those changes weren't legal. That's the only legitimate legal argument, not actual fraud. The cases that were thrown out mostly claimed that whole classes of voters voted in improper ways, and that their votes should be thrown out. The problem is that no judge is going to throw out the votes of people who followed the rules as they were told. It's possible that courts will consider these arguments, and decide that in fact some states did allow voting that they shouldn't have. That would affect future elections. Indeed even without court decisions, some Republican states are trying to make sure the rules are tighter next time. Apparently everyone, including Trump, thinks that if everyone votes, Republicans lose. I was pleased to find that Republican officials are not willing to fudge counts. But that doesn't mean they want it to happen again. Several Republican states are going to try to restrict voting. Democrats are going to try to pass voting rights laws to prevent this. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
General Political Discussion
claiming "undeniable proof the election was stolen and the courts ignored it" is NOT sedition?
Top
Bottom