- Apr 5, 2007
- 25,446
- 803
- 71
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
Here a non-biology creationist talks again.
The biological classification used the idea of Clade. (link) It bears the meaning of ancestral history, and thus is a system support the idea of evolution.
Is this system only ideologic and has no practical use (except labeling)? Since evolutionists will certainly oppose this idea, so I really like to learn even a single case that this ancestry-focused classification system is useful to solve a practical question. What I meant is that if we do not involve the use of ancestry, then this classification system won't work in a practical sense.
Please.
The biological classification used the idea of Clade. (link) It bears the meaning of ancestral history, and thus is a system support the idea of evolution.
Is this system only ideologic and has no practical use (except labeling)? Since evolutionists will certainly oppose this idea, so I really like to learn even a single case that this ancestry-focused classification system is useful to solve a practical question. What I meant is that if we do not involve the use of ancestry, then this classification system won't work in a practical sense.
Please.