• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Circular Reasoning

Status
Not open for further replies.

Justatruthseeker

Newbie
Site Supporter
Jun 4, 2013
10,132
996
Tulsa, OK USA
✟200,004.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
The topic is about dating techniques. Youre trying to make it a it your usual pet topics, the same way you always do.


We were discussing dating and the use of Fermi's incorrect theory - until YOU changed the subject. Don't like where it ends up - quit changing the subject with strawmwn.
 
Upvote 0

Justatruthseeker

Newbie
Site Supporter
Jun 4, 2013
10,132
996
Tulsa, OK USA
✟200,004.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
All I did was ask a question. You brought up Horner and Schwietzer before that.


Are you implying the finding of soft tissue has no relation to dating theories????
 
Upvote 0

lasthero

Newbie
Jul 30, 2013
11,421
5,795
✟244,477.00
Faith
Seeker
Are you implying the finding of soft tissue has no relation to dating theories????

It has nothing to do with the OP, which is about relative dating techniques.

It's just another lame attempt to make every topic you're in relate to your favorite points. You do this constantly.
 
Upvote 0

Justatruthseeker

Newbie
Site Supporter
Jun 4, 2013
10,132
996
Tulsa, OK USA
✟200,004.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
It has nothing to do with the OP, which is about relative dating techniques.

It's just another lame attempt to make every topic you're in relate to your favorite points. You do this constantly.


So the FACT that soft tissue was found despite claims it was impossible - has no relevance in your mind to the fact that those relative dating methods based upon an incorrect theory - might be in error??????

I fail to see your reasoning, being dating is based upon a theory we know was wrong to begin with? And now there is evidence they might not be as old as your relative dating technique based upon incorrect theory - tells you it is. And I guess we will ignore the carbon-14 tests you claim as highly accurate when dating actual fossils is now not so accurate and perhaps subject to error when brought against the theory????
 
Upvote 0

justlookinla

Regular Member
Mar 31, 2014
11,767
199
✟35,675.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
So the FACT that soft tissue was found despite claims it was impossible - has no relevance in your mind to the fact that those relative dating methods based upon an incorrect theory - might be in error??????

Amazing ain't it?
 
Upvote 0

crjmurray

The Bear. Not The Bull.
Dec 17, 2014
4,490
1,146
Lake Ouachita
✟16,029.00
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Private
So the FACT that soft tissue was found despite claims it was impossible - has no relevance in your mind to the fact that those relative dating methods based upon an incorrect theory - might be in error??????

I fail to see your reasoning, being dating is based upon a theory we know was wrong to begin with? And now there is evidence they might not be as old as your relative dating technique based upon incorrect theory - tells you it is. And I guess we will ignore the carbon-14 tests you claim as highly accurate when dating actual fossils is now not so accurate and perhaps subject to error when brought against the theory????

Who said it was impossible?
 
Upvote 0

Justatruthseeker

Newbie
Site Supporter
Jun 4, 2013
10,132
996
Tulsa, OK USA
✟200,004.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

crjmurray

The Bear. Not The Bull.
Dec 17, 2014
4,490
1,146
Lake Ouachita
✟16,029.00
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Private
Upvote 0

lasthero

Newbie
Jul 30, 2013
11,421
5,795
✟244,477.00
Faith
Seeker
So the FACT that soft tissue was found despite claims it was impossible - has no relevance in your mind to the fact that those relative dating methods based upon an incorrect theory - might be in error??????

No one ever said it was impossible. You've yet to produce even one direct quote of a scientist saying that.

Regardless, that has nothing to do with the techniques or the methodology themselves. If you want to start a separate topic about Horner and the soft tissue, I'll participate.
 
Upvote 0

Justatruthseeker

Newbie
Site Supporter
Jun 4, 2013
10,132
996
Tulsa, OK USA
✟200,004.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
No one ever said it was impossible. You've yet to produce even one direct quote of a scientist saying that.

Regardless, that has nothing to do with the techniques or the methodology themselves. If you want to start a separate topic about Horner and the soft tissue, I'll participate.


Sigh. Already did that twice - apparently evolutionists truly do not understand their own theory - as is being evidenced over and over in this one post alone that they haven't a clue as to what their own scientists believed.

http://www.christianforums.com/t7878140-11/#post67469873

http://www.christianforums.com/t7878140-9/#post67469355

How many more do you need? Shall we go down to the library and get a book on fossils and see what it says about it? or do you prefer to avoid that?

http://www.livescience.com/41537-t-rex-soft-tissue.html
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

crjmurray

The Bear. Not The Bull.
Dec 17, 2014
4,490
1,146
Lake Ouachita
✟16,029.00
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Private
Upvote 0

justlookinla

Regular Member
Mar 31, 2014
11,767
199
✟35,675.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

lasthero

Newbie
Jul 30, 2013
11,421
5,795
✟244,477.00
Faith
Seeker
Sigh. Already did that twice - apparently evolutionists truly do not understand their own theory - as is being evidenced over and over in this one post alone that they haven't a clue as to what their own scientists believed.

http://www.christianforums.com/t7878140-11/#post67469873

http://www.christianforums.com/t7878140-9/#post67469355

Again, if you want to discuss this topic - for the hundredth time - make a separate topic. Stop trying to derail this topic.
 
Upvote 0

Justatruthseeker

Newbie
Site Supporter
Jun 4, 2013
10,132
996
Tulsa, OK USA
✟200,004.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
Again, if you want to discuss this topic - for the hundredth time - make a separate topic. Stop trying to derail this topic.


""The finding amazed colleagues, who had never imagined that even a trace of still-soft dinosaur tissue could survive. After all, as any textbook will tell you, when an animal dies, soft tissues such as blood vessels, muscle and skin decay and disappear over time, while hard tissues like bone may gradually acquire minerals from the environment and become fossils."

If it wasn't impossible, then why didn't they ever imagine it could be possible?

Don't try silly word games to avoid the fact that none of you understand what your own theory says.

Someone should of at least imagined it as possible and looked even once if they didn't think it was impossible.

Oh, sorry they did, you just fired him is all when he presented the evidence and dared question the Dogma they preach about age. So Mary quite contrary then comes along and presents the same evidence without questions of age - and suddenly its acceptable.
 
Upvote 0

Aureus

Regular Member
May 20, 2014
801
61
✟24,262.00
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Private
""The finding amazed colleagues, who had never imagined that even a trace of still-soft dinosaur tissue could survive. After all, as any textbook will tell you, when an animal dies, soft tissues such as blood vessels, muscle and skin decay and disappear over time, while hard tissues like bone may gradually acquire minerals from the environment and become fossils."

If it wasn't impossible, then why didn't they ever imagine it could be possible?

Don't try silly word games to avoid the fact that none of you understand what your own theory says.

Someone should of at least imagined it as possible and looked even once if they didn't think it was impossible.

Oh, sorry they did, you just fired him is all when he presented the evidence and dared question the Dogma they preach about age. So Mary quite contrary then comes along and presents the same evidence without questions of age - and suddenly its acceptable.

I don't imagine my buddy that owns a Ferrari will ever drop by and sign the pink slip over to me, doesn't mean it's impossible.
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,629
12,069
✟230,471.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
maybe.
there is really no way to know what the physical reality of the big bang was.

There is no way to know with our current understanding of physics. That does not mean that that will always be the case. We may understand how and why it happened in the future. But one sure dead end is to just say "God did it."
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.