• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Christians do not "own" morality

Syd the Human

Let it go
Mar 27, 2014
405
6
✟23,185.00
Faith
Agnostic


I did not see anything about them not having a soul in the text you provided but you know what? It doesn't matter. Regardless of what you say, they are still human.

You have not refuted any point that I just made. Except for the part about god creating angels, you just went on without addressing what I said, so I will re-post.

"Did the angels have sex with a human and from that did they produce a child?

If the answer is yes, then it is indeed still human due to human lineage.

Besides, did god not create angels as well? Or, is god not actually the creator of everything? Besides, even in the animal kingdom there are hybrids. Are they now no longer animals? If so, which are still animals and which are not?

And again, humans have also "enslaved, tortured, cannibalized, murdered, and sacrificed" people. Nothing new here at all.

edit: You even furthered my point that they are still human by saying they were cannibals. The only way an organism is a cannibal is by eating their own species. We are not a cannibal for eating a cow, but by eating a human."

I already explained why they are still human.

I have shown that they do the exact same things that humans do.

God committed a genocide because he gave up. No matter how you discuss it that is what happened. Even if they were people without souls, he could have given them one. He could have sent himself to die for himself sooner. He could have prevented the angels from doing this. He waited, let people suffer, and then committed genocide.

You can't escape this.
 
Upvote 0

Ruthie24

Junior Member
Apr 15, 2014
442
38
USA
✟23,594.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian

They are not human. They are hybrid chimera embodying demonic spirits. They do not have human souls. They are not human but things which embody demons. You continue to miss the demonic part, which is the key to the entire issue. I have made my point. If you want to continue to disagree with scripture be my guest.
 
Upvote 0

Syd the Human

Let it go
Mar 27, 2014
405
6
✟23,185.00
Faith
Agnostic

I haven't missed anything, I am fully aware that according to this text fallen angels procreated with humans. I have addressed the text and your points, and you haven't discussed the points that I have now posted twice. We've both made points, you just haven't been able to fully address mine.
 
Upvote 0

Chany

Uncertain Absurdist
Nov 29, 2011
6,428
228
In bed
✟30,379.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

So, all of the people and things God killed, ordering the killing of, or had his followers order the killing of in the Bible were these creatures?
 
Upvote 0

Archaeopteryx

Wanderer
Jul 1, 2007
22,229
2,608
✟78,240.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private

They're orcs?
 
Upvote 0

Ruthie24

Junior Member
Apr 15, 2014
442
38
USA
✟23,594.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian
So, all of the people and things God killed, ordering the killing of, or had his followers order the killing of in the Bible were these creatures?

I'm referring to Enoch, the flood and the groups of people who were connected to the nephilim either by blood or worshipping them. I'd have to go back through it again and list all the names associated with them, but it's in there.
 
Upvote 0

Chany

Uncertain Absurdist
Nov 29, 2011
6,428
228
In bed
✟30,379.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I'm referring to Enoch, the flood and the groups of people who were connected to the nephilim either by blood or worshipping them. I'd have to go back through it again and list all the names associated with them, but it's in there.

No, no, no. Worshiping or being relating to the nephilim doesn't count.

You can debate that demons given a physical body need to be destroyed (which does not explain why there are still demons in the first place, but I'll let it go), but you can't say the same of humans who just happened to have nephilim blood or the people who worshiped them. They're still people, so the ban cannot apply to them. They can be saved, their souls corrected, and their bodies healed. They do not need to be killed.

Also, I'm not solely talking about the people killed in the flood.
 
Upvote 0

Ruthie24

Junior Member
Apr 15, 2014
442
38
USA
✟23,594.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian

I guess what you would need to do is go through the books of Enoch, Jasher, Jubilees and the OT/NT. I'm not a scholar on this and don't feel I can do it justice. You have to go through the books just like I did to find the connections.

I was fully ready to give up my faith and become an atheist had it not been for this research. There are just too many connections that point to God Christ Jesus and the Fallen angels.
 
Upvote 0

Syd the Human

Let it go
Mar 27, 2014
405
6
✟23,185.00
Faith
Agnostic

There is evidence of this outside the Bible and other religious writings? If you can explain this.
 
Upvote 0

Ruthie24

Junior Member
Apr 15, 2014
442
38
USA
✟23,594.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian
There is evidence of this outside the Bible and other religious writings? If you can explain this.

Actually there is, sad to say. In other religions and other sources. No one has ever asked me to explain it and I'm not sure how to grapple with all the stuff I've found out. The world is a kaleidoscope manifesting this story. I wish none of this were true. I wish I had never stumbled upon this crap, but that's what you get when you are at the end of your rope. When you say to God f*** you show me the f****** evidence or I'm outta here, God says, "OK but you better be ready and not complain." And that's basically what you get when you keep knocking and digging. I would have been much happier being an atheist.
I don't really know how to explain observing demonic phenomena on a personal level because one) no one would believe you, two) the fear and hate that are coupled with this kind of thing (what those things live off of ) is really of a level that is hard for people to conceptualize. There is an energy to fear especially in the young that those things feed off of. It's like their oxygen. The Left Hand Path has been in existence since the 200 angels fell. That's THEIR religion. It's got a lot of names, but the essence is still the same. I don't have all the answers, but unfortunately I am convinced of what I've found out due to things I've literally stumbled upon.

Like I said before, I'm not a scholar, I'm not a 100% on anything really, except for me personally I was unfortunately given an opportunity to connect the dots. Now maybe those dots are malarkey but then history of the world would show it to be such. All I can say is, if you look underneath enough rocks unfortunately you will find the caves.
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Critically Copernican
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
24,752
11,565
Space Mountain!
✟1,366,121.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

Hello Ruthie (and thread members),

Ruthie, while I find your research interesting in that it definitely brings to our attention various apocryphal books that present later elaborations on the Genocidal incidents in the O.T, I think we might want to keep in mind that God did what He did overall because He holds all nations to the same standard, including Israel. Therefore, if nations just so happen to keep on keeping on with godless practices, God will eventually make a solid end of those nations and/or people groups. See Leviticus 18 & 20.

Peace
 
Upvote 0

steve_bakr

Christian
Aug 3, 2011
5,918
240
✟30,033.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat

I would just suggest that you keep your eyes on God and have faith in his Mercy.
 
Upvote 0

Syd the Human

Let it go
Mar 27, 2014
405
6
✟23,185.00
Faith
Agnostic
There is evidence of this outside the Bible and other religious writings? If you can explain this.


I did ask for non-religious texts, or did those from whatever religion not write any of that stuff down?

Let's just say, what evidence outside of any religion do you have? I don't want anything about your spiritual journey, emotional appeals make no difference to me when asking for evidence of something. If you want to convince me to donate to some charity then yes, pile it on. But otherwise I don't see the point in the majority of what you just posted. I don't mean to be rude, but religious people always do that whenever evidence is asked for.
 
Upvote 0

Ruthie24

Junior Member
Apr 15, 2014
442
38
USA
✟23,594.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian

First of all I'm not religious, I don't go to or belong to any church. There's a difference between a religious Christian, a religious spiritual Christian, and a spiritual one IMO. I don't prescribe to any church dogma. Second, I don't know what you are getting at with the charity bit, it's pretty lame. Third, yeah you are being rude, in fact the way you people come off is pretty pathetic in how you have a conversation with others. It's no wonder why Christians or other religions don't wanna engage with you on these threads. You guys just don't get it that that's not how you talk to people. Hello, McFly??? Fourth, if you recall I said I do have evidence and I don't know how to grapple with it all because there is so much. Fifth, I'm not gonna throw down any more evidentiary posts like I did before with Enoch as it was a huge waste of time. You have a mind, you have a computer. Google, YouTube, Amazon: nephilim and see what you find. I have lots of authors, texts, and topics that are tied into the nephilim and I'll give my reference list in one post as soon as I can. Am not gonna do your homework for you. I don't know if it's my age or coming out of grad school, but I don't have a lot of patience for intellectual laziness and dishonesty. If I tried to present anything debate wise or to back up my studies in my apa papers I would have failed and gotten my butt thrown out of grad school. You people suck hardcore with your lame comments and laughable "I don't have to present any evidence at all, you do the work for me cuz I'm too lazy and self righteous to open a book. And how dare you tell me to read or do research, don't you know I got my atheist talking points folder right here?" You know any professor would toss you outta class so fast you wouldn't be able to think straight. What a bunch of claptrap hogwash.

Oh, and an "agnostic female atheist with a 'the warlock' banner" is telling. And you're not religious? LOL. Yeah, right.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Chany

Uncertain Absurdist
Nov 29, 2011
6,428
228
In bed
✟30,379.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

So, ad hominems. Great.

Yes, when someone makes big claims about reality, it's expected for them to provide evidence. Any professor I know would laugh at you for the claims you make.

Keep in mind that we have been, in effect, suspending our disbelief with the story to prove a point about its immorality. We don't think the Bible is true; it holds no actual weight with us.

Simply answer my question with a yes or no answer:

Did God, at any point in time, kill a human being?
 
Upvote 0

Ruthie24

Junior Member
Apr 15, 2014
442
38
USA
✟23,594.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian

And my answer to you is, I don't know, I'm not God, and I wasn't there. You're asking a really big question that I don't have the answers to 100%. When it comes to every group of biblical people, there's a whole line of history to what happened to them and why. I personally don't believe that God would kill innocent people. Free will does though. Could it be that some tribes used the God thing to justify killing? Idk, I wasn't there, I'm not a scholar and I've not researched every war etc in the Bible. The Bible is several thousands of years old. I'm not 100% confident it wasn't tampered with by political and religious authorities because of the glaring omissions of several books mentioned in the Bible.

I know that genocide has taken place in all religions and cultures of the world. I know that there is a large agenda at foot to manipulate the masses today from what I've discovered. All I can present is what I've found out. If you aren't willing to do any searching on your own, that's your choice, but don't expect me to present anymore evidence that you refuse to look at because it conflicts with your own firmly established worldview. It's not my job to prove to you that I'm right because I honestly don't know myself 100%, all I can go by is where the evidence leads me and try to connect the dots as best I can.

The thing is, none of you, not a single one has presented any evidence for your side of the debate, not one. The professors that I know ask for references if you are trying to state a case. There are pros and con's to every issue, but in this debate you aren't presenting anything, but somehow I'm supposed to be the one to present all the evidence, dig through all the texts and refs I have and do all the work. That's super lame and intellectually lazy. I really don't care what you believe. IMO you are 100% free to believe whatever you want. This is just what I personally believe, you don't have to nor do I expect you to believe anything I say or any evidence I present. Also don't expect me to believe anything you say or present especially when you aren't presenting anything but your personal opinions and talking points.
 
Upvote 0

Syd the Human

Let it go
Mar 27, 2014
405
6
✟23,185.00
Faith
Agnostic

I think you overreacted to this.

1. I asked for non-religious texts and then you said your evidence was other religions having the same idea as those within the Enoch text. So I asked if you had any other evidence outside of a religion.

2. You were using emotion to try and make a point, and I was asking you not to do that. The only time a person should do that when trying to persuade someone is if they are trying to raise money for charity or something.

3. By "you people" I think you mean agnostics and atheists. I don't think that is true in my case. I have never insulted anyone, but I will admit I have gotten frustrated with people. I think the "meanest" thing I've done is using the doh smiley in one of my posts. And, we are talked to all of the time. So I don't see how you think people don't want to engage with us.

4. If there is so much describing some should not be too hard. I asked for evidence outside of religion and that's the main source I got from you.

5. I have not been lazy or dishonest. You were making some serious claims and I asked if you had any evidence to which you replied you did. Enoch was a religious text and I addressed the points that you made without insulting you at all. And really? I suck hardcore for not instantaneously believing everything that I hear? Am I supposed to believe in Krampus and the Loch Ness monster as well? Plenty of books have been written on them too. The amount that something has been written about does not make it true. And, being in college myself I don't think I would get kicked out. I've gotten an A on every single paper I've written. So I think I know how to do research.

6. I took that quiz when you click on one of those. I think I got warlock because I said if my home were to be broken into I would hide and set an ambush and because my greatest strength would be all of my arcane knowledge. I don't practice anything though. I think the banner is part of a RPG type thing. *Shrug*
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Syd the Human

Let it go
Mar 27, 2014
405
6
✟23,185.00
Faith
Agnostic

We are discussing the morality of a situation. I could present you with this:

Mandy killed Billy. Is this moral?

You would not have to provide scholarly work to discuss whether this is moral or not. So why do we suddenly have to in order to discuss the morality of a religious text that plainly says that god had people commit genocide against other humans?
 
Upvote 0

Ruthie24

Junior Member
Apr 15, 2014
442
38
USA
✟23,594.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian

I can't make the determination whether it's moral because I don't know the context in which Mandy killed Billy. If Mandy killed Billy because he was trying to rape, beat, murder or broke into her house to cause her bodily harm, she had every right to kill him. If Mandy 'murdered' Billy by poisoning him with radiator fluid to collect on the insurance policy, that's immoral. There's a big difference between murder and killing.

When it comes to the Bible you are making claims about what occurred in it without doing the research (linguistics, history, authorship, what do the scholars say about it etc., how was it compiled etc). You are trying to apply a very simple statement to an extremely complicated document and it doesn't work that way. Therefore you have to dig into it to find out, "OK, what happened here? Let me see what I can find out."

Even when you ask is it moral that Mandy killed Billy, it's much more complicated than that simple statement, because you have what happened between them, what was the crime, their relationship, how did the crime unfold etc. It doesn't work out just to say is it moral that Mandy killed Billy.
 
Upvote 0