If John was showing the way to salvation through baptism, then what was the need for Jesus to do what he is said to have done? Surley people could have just carried on being baptised.
And why have baptism nowadays if Jesus' salvation was the ultimate?
You say that since the death and resurrection of Jesus, anyone who doesn't believe in him will go to hell.... erm... is it just me or is that completely insane!!???
News travelled very slowly in those days so it could take many years before everyone in the world heard about it, so in the meantime God said 'It's tuff luck, you weren't living in close proximity to that event so you're going to hell!!!'
And why have baptism nowadays if Jesus' salvation was the ultimate?
You say that since the death and resurrection of Jesus, anyone who doesn't believe in him will go to hell.... erm... is it just me or is that completely insane!!???
News travelled very slowly in those days so it could take many years before everyone in the world heard about it, so in the meantime God said 'It's tuff luck, you weren't living in close proximity to that event so you're going to hell!!!'