- Oct 28, 2006
- 21,293
- 10,016
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
I could also say.. Do not think that I've come to abolish the Law. Clearly if the LAW was used for righteousness, and if Paul is blameless as to the Law, then Paul was sinless.
And Christ clearly ignored the Law.
Mark 7: 17 After he had left the crowd and entered the house, his disciples asked him about this parable. 18 “Are you so dull?” he asked. “Don’t you see that nothing that enters a person from the outside can defile them? 19 For it doesn’t go into their heart but into their stomach, and then out of the body.” (In saying this, Jesus declared all foods clean.)
Was pork clean under the Mosaic Law? So, you have two contradictory things about Christ. He allegedly didn't come to abolish the Law and yet, he ignore it and ultimately abolished it. I mean, you are not following it now, are you?
Oh, dear!
Have you ever read the book, Reading the Bible with Rabbi Jesus, by Lois Tverberg? If not, I suggest you start.
Upvote
0