Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
To repeat my 1st post to you..........YOU are wasting your time posting your Universal idea to me.
Others may like what you say but I am not one of them.
As I have said many times.....the only way to make Universalism acceptable is to change the meaning of Scriptures.
Just as you just did.
Please do the google search OR do a Bible study and you will see that Jesus was speaking about the "Judgement of the Nations" after Armageddon. It is the conclusion of Christs prophetic discourse.
He speaks of a judgment of separation.
Funny, that's what many say about Calvinism.
So in this instance you're saying what Jesus said isn't what it sounds like He's saying, even though He's speaking very clearly.
Steve Gregg isn't a universalist. He's just giving a lecture on the three Christian views of hell. He's a very accomplished and well respected Bible teacher. You can learn more about him here: The Narrow Path | Home Or are you afraid to learn more about what you're fighting against?
Which is what many Christians say about some your views which you listed. Check out some of the threads in the soteriology section about OSAS for starters.
What is it about universal redemption that annoys so many Christians? Shouldn’t we be happy that God’s love and mercy are wider, higher, deeper, and broader than we could ever imagine? We all sin at times so shouldn't we welcome the thought that God is not going to annihilate or eternally torment us if we don't “accept,” “trust,” “repent,” “believe,” well enough to appropriate the grace of God?
You would think so but it seems from the recent threads on Christian Universalism that this is not the case. Why is this?
Here are some of the reasons that have been expressed in the threads:
1. ”If everyone is or will be saved, what’s the point in following Jesus?”
To me, anyone who thinks this must see following Jesus as a heavy burden, one that needs the reward of heaven to make it worth the hassle. But shouldn't following Jesus and having a good relationship with him here and now be its own reward?
It's also a misunderstanding of Christian Universalism to think it says that we don't have to receive the saving grace of Christ in order to be reconciled to God and to each other. It just says that if we don't manage to do this in this life there will be boundless opportunities to do so in the next one and that eventually every one will accept forgiveness and repent of their sins... ”that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of those in heaven, and of those on earth, and of those under the earth" (Phil 2:10)
2. "All my hard work at being a Christian has been undermined".
This is very much like 1. Shouldn't any work we do be done out of love for God, not for any personal eternal rewards?
3. ”If there is an 'us,' there has to be a 'them'"
This may be true about some things such as football: I support Manchester United so I hate Manchester City (I'm from the UK, apologies) but it needn't apply to matters of faith. If we are going to heaven when we die there doesn't have to be a group who go to hell.
These three reasons seem to have something in common and that's judgementalism. They're all essentially saying "Look, I'm a good Christian and my hard work and sacrifices has earned me membership into the very exclusive club of heaven and, sad to say it, but most other people haven't done anywhere nearly as enough as me and so, unfortunately, missed out on the opportunity." This makes you think of the work vs. faith debate ironically but, moving swiftly on from that, isn't it true that being judgemental is wrong and if that's the main reason behind our objection to Christian Universalism, shouldn't we consider that we might be misunderstanding it?
There are biblical arguments that can be made for and against Christian Universalism but there are plenty of existing threads discussing that so, assuming anyone wants to respond!, I'd be more interested in hearing what your gut, visceral reaction is, whether for or against, when you hear the words "Christian Universalism". For me, it's basically relief that God is a loving God and not a monster after all.
Just to be clear, I don't expect you to LIKE what I post. My hope is only that you would make an attempt to UNDERSTAND what I post.To repeat my 1st post to you..........YOU are wasting your time posting your Universal idea to me.
Others may like what you say but I am not one of them.
Great question. We need to look at the definition of the NT Greek. See below. Thanks. (whole-heartedly, and without reservation)Now Steve......where in that Scripture does it say that the lost in hell will be resurrect TO HEAVEN??????
It says that that will bow and admitt that Jesus is the Christ to the Glory of God.
That saw cuts both ways, friend.Every post you make is clouded by your PERSONAL agenda...
Not true. It happened before, it can happen again.DEATH SEALED THEIR OPPORTUNITY TO CHOOSE CHRIST.
Where is the heart of the earth?
Did you feel that? Whooooosssh. Right over your head.Forgive me, I thought you were about to cite an obscure born again Latin scholar named Platypus (aka 'the once-dead-but-now-living Platypus') in support of your position for a moment there.
Nothing whatsoever surprises me that is said from those who reject the word of God.
You will not find one single thing I have said which I did not back up with Scripture from the word of God.
No sir. Fear is not something I have.
After going through 2 wars and its horrors, ..... cancer, and 2 knee replacements and back surgery, fear was left behind a long time ago.
I actually know what I am speaking about......more than I am willing to post here.
There is only ONE valid view of hell my friend and that is the one God told us about in the Bible. Everything else is simply a manufactured opinion from the minds of those who do not accept what God said.
Did you feel that? Whooooosssh. Right over your head.
AS i have sated several times.....I agree with you about Calvinism and I am not a proponent of Calvinism.
* * *
But...only those of us who are not UR-ites can say it and truly mean it. How many times in a discussion here does someone from the Hell no! crowd say words do not mean what they are translated as in most versions?MMXX said:Here we go back again to you saying rejecting a particular doctrine is rejecting the word of God.
That's what everyone says. Those from every doctrine, theology and denomination all say that same thing.
Yes, that is a little strange.It might be a little strange for you what I'm going to write to answer your question: Where is the heart of the earth? First earth here is not Earth-the Planet, but Israel; so the heart of "earth" is Israel.
But JESUS was referring specifically to Jerusalem (the heart of Israel), the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified.
Yes, that is a little strange.
How does that relate to Jesus' prophecy about his resurrection?
The sign of Jonah. Three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?