Good Day. Bling
All my electronic versions have (dishonor)
(ASV) Or hath not the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel unto honor, and another unto dishonor?
(Bishops) Hath not the potter power ouer the clay, euen of the same lumpe to make one vessel vnto honour, and another vnto dishonour?
(Darby) Or has not the potter authority over the clay, out of the same lump to make one vessel to honour, and another to dishonour?
(ESV) Has the potter no right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for dishonorable use?
(ESV+) R3Has the potter no right over the clay, to make out of the same lump R4one vessel for honorable use and another for dishonorable use?
(Geneva) Hath not the potter power of the clay to make of the same lumpe one vessell to honour, and another vnto dishonour?
(KJV) Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?
(KJV+) (G2228) HathG2192 notG3756 theG3588 potterG2763 powerG1849 over theG3588 clay,G4081 ofG1537 theG3588 sameG846 lumpG5445 to makeG4160 oneG3739 G3303 vesselG4632 untoG1519 honour,G5092 andG1161 anotherG3739 untoG1519 dishonour?G819
(YLT) hath not the potter authority over the clay, out of the same lump to make the one vessel to honour, and the one to dishonour?
Douglas Moo Notes:
http://library.mibckerala.org/lms_frame/eBook/Romans NICNT.pdf
Snip: 21 Paul continues to use the imagery of the potter and his clay to reinforce the point of v. 20. His rhetorical question asserts the right72 of the potter to make out of the same "lump" of clay both a vessel "for honor"7 3 and one "for dishonor."74 While Isa. 29:16 and (probably) 45:9 have furnished the immediate source of Paul's language, the metaphorical application of the potter and the clay is quite widespread in both the OT and Judaism.75 Scholars have argued that one text or another is key to Paul's imagery here and draw conclusions about Paul's meaning accordingly. Noting that several of the OT texts involved (Isa. 45:9; Jer. 18:6-10) focus on Israel as a nation, some scholars think that Paul is arguing for God's right to use the people of Israel "for dishonor" — in other words, to use the nation in a negative way in salvation history.76 The idea that Paul is focusing on God's use of what he makes rather than on the making itself is suggested also, it is argued, by the probable allusion to Wis. 15:77 7 and by the clear
70. The first six words — uf| epei x6 itXaopxx id) irlaaavTi — match the LXX of Isa. 29:16a exactly. The rest of the verse may reflect Isa. 45:9b — LXX pf| epei 6 nr\}jbq TOO xepauel, TC jcotetc,, 6xi oiix epya£n oiiSe exeu; x&P&Z "The clay will not say to the potter, will it, 'Why have you made me?' for you do not work, neither do you have hands?" (e.g., Kuss; Schlier; Dunn). Johnson, however, thinks Paul may be thinking of Wis. 12:12 (Function, 132-33). 7 1. Gk. avrraTTOxpivouoct, a term that suggests the nuance of contention. See, e.g., its only other NT occurrence: the Pharisees, wanting to condemn Jesus for his Sabbath healing but confronted with Jesus' provoking question, "were not able to answer back to these things" (Luke 14:6; cf. also Job 16:8; BAGD; Dunn). 72. Gk. e^owtav. 73. Gk. elc, Tiuriv. 74. Gk. el<; axiufav. 75. See esp. Job 10:9; 38:14; Isa. 29:16; 45:9-10; 64:7; Jer. 18:1-6; Sir. 33:13; Wis. 15:7; T. Naph. 2:2, 4; 1QS 11:22. 76. E.g., Munck, Christ and Israel, p. 58; Godet. Hays (p. 66) thinks that the key text is Jer. 18 and that Paul therefore implies, as does the Jeremiah text, that God is working with his vessels to reshape them. While hardened for the moment, therefore, the Jews have the opportunity to repent and be reestablished as the people of God. 77. "For when a potter [xepapeucj kneads the soft earth and laboriously molds [nXdaoei] each vessel for our service, he fashions out of the same clay [rnitarii] both the vessels [oxeurt] that serve clean uses and those for contrary uses, making all in like manner, but which shall be the use of each of these the worker in clay decides." 602 9:14-23 OBJECTIONS ANSWERED: THE FREEDOM AND PURPOSE OF GOD 603 parallel between this text and 2 Tim. 2:20.78 On this general approach, then, the verse is asserting God's right to use nations, or individuals, for different purposes in his unfolding plan of salvation.79 Some — such as Ishmael, Esau, Pharaoh, and the hardened Jews — have a negative or "dishonorable" role to play in the purposes of God in history. Others — such as Isaac, Jacob, and believing Jews and Gentiles — have a positive role.
Other scholars, however, note that many of the OT and Jewish texts that compare God to a potter focus on God as Creator — a point that Paul underscores by using the verb plasso*0 Further, the contrast between "honor" and "dishonor" is said to match the contrast between "glory" and "wrath," or "destruction," in vv. 22-23.81 On this reading, Paul is asserting God's right to make from the mass of humanity (the "lump") some persons who are destined to inherit salvation and others who are destined for wrath and condemnation.82 Certainty about which OT and Jewish texts Paul may have in mind is impossible to attain and probably immaterial: Paul's imagery is probably distilled generally from many of them without being specifically dependent on any one of them.83 This means that our exegetical conclusions must be guided by Paul's own use of the metaphor, and not by any specific contexts in which the metaphor appears.
We have seen that Paul is applying his teaching to the issue of the present spiritual condition and eternal destiny of unbelieving Jews (and believing Jews and Gentiles). This makes it likely that Paul is thinking here also of the eternal destinies of individuals.
78. 'in a great house there are not only vessels [oxetinj of gold and silver but also of wood and earthenware, and some for noble use [& UEV eic, Turn.v], some for ignoble [& 5e eic, atipiav]. " 79. See, e.g., Gifford; Morris; Cranfield; Leenhardt; Beyschlag, Theodicee, pp. 55-56; H. H. Rowley, The Biblical Doctrine of Election (London: Lutterworth, 1950), pp. 40-42. 80. This verb is used in the creation account (Gen. 2:7) and in many other texts referring to God as Creator (Job 10:8-9; Ps. 33:15; 2 Mace. 7:23; Josephus, Ant. 1.32,34; cf. Dunn, 2.556). Paul's only other use of the verb is in reference to creation (1 Tim. 2:13). Miiller (over-?)stresses the importance of creation ideas in this context (Gottes Gerechtigkeit, pp. 28-29). 81. xipri is used as a synonym of glory in Rom. 2:7, 10, while axiptoc is used as the opposite of glory in 1 Cor. 15:43. On the other hand, Paul never elsewhere uses atipf a of eternal destiny. And the closest verbal parallel to this language is in 2 Tim. 2:20 (oxeuVj, etc, tipi^v, etc, atiptocv), which does not speak of eternal destiny. 82. See esp. Piper, 174-83; Hodge; Murray. 83. See esp. Cranfield. Thus, e.g., the vocabulary of v. 21 is closest to Wis. 15:7 (they share the Greek words xepapeuc,, icr\X6q, and rcXaooco), but the respective contexts (the text in Wisdom focuses on the foolishness of idolatry) are quite distinct (see Piper, 176-77). THE EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS.