• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Chick fil-a has caved to anti-Christian hate groups

durangodawood

re Member
Aug 28, 2007
27,570
19,252
Colorado
✟538,896.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
I substituted for a friend once as a Salvation Army bell ringer once, outside WalMart.

Wont be doing that again so long as they refuse to recognize the humanity of everyone.

From their own website:
"At times, The Salvation Army has joined other religious organizations in solidarity on issues like religious liberty and the traditional definition of marriage."
 
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
28,240
17,042
Here
✟1,469,942.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

That was more or less me trying to express the opposite. I think that the overwhelming majority of people who oppose same sex rights are anti-gay. This "I just support traditional marriage, but I'm not anti-gay" is just a word game (as I said before).

If you want to limit the rights of "group XYZ" when said rights wouldn't impact you negatively in any tangible way, that's an anti-"group XYZ" position...I don't see any other way to slice it.

But here's a chance for you to clarify..., explain to me, in your own words, how one can not be "anti-gay", but still ardently support policies that deliberately try to deprive gay people of an equal right or treatment (that's not negatively impacting anyone else in any way)?

...and I don't mean the canned answer I've heard from others...that whole bit about "We don't hate the person, we just don't like the act so the restrictions we want are just aimed at the act, not the people" since that's a disingenuous answer when it's someone's rights we're talking about.


Here's where I'll play the part of Crowder

 
Upvote 0

GreatLakes4Ever

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2019
3,508
4,959
39
Midwest
✟271,584.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Engaged

And in this “flip flop”they have brought the wrath of Mike Huckabee down on them. Even though it isn’t a flip flop at all. They are just changing who is receiving their donations. Instead of donating to Salvation Army and the FCA like they have in the past they are focusing on groups that support education and fight homelessness and hunger. I can’t imagine anyone being upset by that but there are Christians who are. Why?
 
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
28,240
17,042
Here
✟1,469,942.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Boycotts only hurt the workers not the owners. If chik-fil-a was somehow affected by a boycott workers would be the first to go, the owners will always be ok.

I'd actually modify that sentiment...

Boycotts only hurt workers IF the owners refuse to listen to what a large enough majority of the population is expressing with their boycott.

In this case, it sounds like the owners listened to what the people were saying and adjusted some of their fiscal policies with regards to support of other organizations.

If 70% of the population hates something a business owner is doing so much that they're refusing to patronize their business, if the business owner decides to dig their heels in and go with the 30% that are either in support of them or indifferent, they...as well as their employees, will feel it in the pocketbook.

In most cases, business owners are smart (they don't get to be on the executive team of a fortune 500 company by not having an ear for the market trends).

Boycott outcomes, more often than not, end up with the people running a business, correctly interpreting which position has more public support, and going with that.

The head of Chick-fil-a saw that their current situation was limiting the ability to open up new locations, and was potentially alienating a large enough part of the population that they made the decision to change things up. I suspect it was the right decision.

Much like, when some far-right evangelicals were doing the the boycott of JC Penney due to their partnership with Ellen, the CEO saw that it was just 2% of the population whining, and that they stood to make a lot more money by being not only inclusive, but doing so with a big TV personality that has a lot of fans, so they made the correct decision to stay the course with what they were doing and just ignore the boycotters and they gave up their cause pretty quickly
Ellen DeGeneres' JC Penney Partnership Boycott Dropped By One Million Moms | HuffPost
 
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
28,240
17,042
Here
✟1,469,942.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

I think the answer is pretty obvious...it seems that it's not considered to be a "real Christian Conservative position" simply to do good things and help some folks, unless it's also coupled with a vociferous support for something that will "own the libs" or express outrage about something they don't like.
 
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
28,240
17,042
Here
✟1,469,942.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
The one near me is not going to have any problems. The lines may get shorter but there will always be a line. Rather like In-n-Out burger.

Line around the block at the one by where I work as well...

Eventually, the angry-right is going to run out of places to eat if they keep having this expectation that quick service restaurants need to also be a vessel for their religious expression.

They're made a chick-fil-a for this
They were mad a BK for having the impossible burger (because it was catering to "liberal veganism and climate change activists")

It's almost like fast food chains want to appeal to the largest segments of the population rather than virtue signaling to appeal to the remaining 32% of people who oppose SSM.
 
Upvote 0

Ana the Ist

Aggressively serene!
Feb 21, 2012
39,990
12,573
✟487,130.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married

Uh huh...they're Christians.

I couldn't find any webpage for the Marriage and Family Foundation (which is odd) but looking into the Family Research Council...it's clear they endorse some very biblical views. They're opposed to the LGBT community, cohabitation, anything other than abstinence before marriage, human trafficking, etc.

In other words, they push their morality onto other people. I get that it's an uncomfortable thing...I don't like it when people presume to tell me what to think, do, say, etc....then judge me or try to shame me for what I think, do, say, etc. You have to have a pretty big ego for that.

I know you're probably thinking it's not just judging....that there's real consequences like getting and keeping a job, or the loss of rights like marriage and freedom of speech. I would agree.

Do you see where I'm going with this?



How old is this example? Were the LGBT groups that opposed the "Straight Pride Parade" heterophobic?

You see the problem here? I get that you think one cause has less validity than the other....but either we can advocate for what we want (beyond equality under the law) or we can't.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
42,463
45,577
Los Angeles Area
✟1,013,689.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Uh huh...they're Christians.

No, Christian does not automatically mean anti-gay rights.

either we can advocate for what we want (beyond equality under the law) or we can't.

I have never proposed preventing people from advocating what they want. But we can call a spade a spade.
 
Reactions: lasthero
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,181
✟545,630.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
The point remains that it's absurd to argue that whatever some group (assuming that all the members of it are identical to each other, which of course is not true) wants, society has an obligation to give it to them.
Things some groups want, such as the ability to worship without being thrown in jail? That sort of thing?
 
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,181
✟545,630.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
On the contrary, this comment is definitely about opposing same-sex marriage, which is not the same as being "anti-gay."

I doubt posts would make this distinction if we were discussing, say, outlawing the Protestant Bible. I doubt anyone would take seriously an argument that such an attempt wasn't anti-Christian.
 
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2015
28,334
9,104
65
✟433,155.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
I think this is a lot of hoopla over nothing. Chick file a founder hasn't changed his position. He hasn't come out and said he now supports gay marriage. I couldn't find where he said specifically that the withdrawal is all about gay stuff.

This is just silly. The Christians in this case that are so upset are going to far in my opinion.
 
Reactions: Speedwell
Upvote 0

Clizby WampusCat

Well-Known Member
Jul 8, 2019
3,657
893
56
Texas
✟124,923.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I think Jesus would still eat at Chik fil A, its heavenly.
 
Reactions: seeking.IAM
Upvote 0

Ana the Ist

Aggressively serene!
Feb 21, 2012
39,990
12,573
✟487,130.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
No, Christian does not automatically mean anti-gay rights.

I didn't say that...

I have never proposed preventing people from advocating what they want. But we can call a spade a spade.

Anti-heretosexual....or "heterophobic" then. Why else would anyone oppose a straight pride parade?

Edit- Also, it's probably a bad idea to call someone a spade.
 
Reactions: rjs330
Upvote 0
Feb 2, 2016
9,855
6,598
41
Chattanooga, TN USA
Visit site
✟267,316.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
First off, my personal opinion of Chick-fil-a is that they are overrated. Secondly, (and I can say this according to scripture) is that their giving is way too politicized. Wasn't JESUS the one who said, when you give, don't let the one hand know what the other hand is doing?

And in fact, they're bordering on the danger of violating James chapter 2. I could care less who Chick-fil-a gives to. They haven't promised me anything they didn't come thru with.
 
Upvote 0

Aryeh Jay

Replaced by a robot, just like Biden.
Site Supporter
Jul 19, 2012
17,623
16,257
MI - Michigan
✟665,922.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I have something to say about the subject at hand. It is important to get it out and will be earth shattering. It is so important that I am going to wait four months to add it to the thread.
 
Reactions: SummerMadness
Upvote 0

cow451

Standing with Ukraine.
Site Supporter
May 29, 2012
41,108
24,132
Hot and Humid
✟1,120,396.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I have something to say about the subject at hand. It is important to get it out and will be earth shattering. It is so important that I am going to wait four months to add it to the thread.
Planning a sabbatical?
 
Upvote 0