Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Then they made a mistake somewhere.It's been tested in real life floods and lahars. And yet, the species caught and drowned are distributed randomly in the debris.
And why would a YEC advocate waste his time testing it in a laboratory, just to satisfy those who say the Flood couldn't have been global?
That's not very likely.It's been tested in real life floods and lahars. And yet, the species caught and drowned are distributed randomly in the debris.
That's not very likely.
Obviously fish are relatively heavier than birds.
That's not very likely.
Obviously fish are relatively heavier than birds.
Rick, this is your original post, and you have no proof of evolution. You have no evidence.
Iḿ not sure, but mammals do tend to have lungs filled with air.That's incredibly poor reasoning.
Why do we find fossils of basilosaurus', a huge aquatic mammal, in layers above prehistoric fish and trilobites?
Yes, when it was still liquid.Let's even entertain the pretty childish notion that "heavy creatures will be below lighter creatures"...
They'ld still be trapped in the same sedimentary layer.
Iḿ not sure, but mammals do tend to have lungs filled with air.
Rick, you have inserted major assumptions. Major assumptions. And have excluded major "causes" that are from the One on High. You have dismissed and restricted His Work and Purpose in the geologic rock record.
And your state your "science is solid"? It is a theory, Rick. A theory lacking the most important evidence. You do know that.
Has this been tested in a laboratory, using life-like dummies, instead of real animals?
Yes, when it was still liquid.
That's not very likely.
Obviously fish are relatively heavier than birds.
It has actually, more or less.
Stratification doesn't just occur when over time you add layers, it happens when a big jumble of mud, rocks and organisms come to rest too.
Obviously birds will end higher up than fish, because of their volume to weight ratio.
Size also plays a roll.
There are good models ceationists subscibe to that are consistent with both the flood and what we see today.
Let's not forget,or let's realize the naturlistic / (popularizd) scientific models have some serious problems too.
The dating of the layers is usually based on the type of fossils in them, and the age of the fossils are usually based on what layer they're in. So that's circular reasoning.
Radioactive dating turns out to be unreliable as well, for various resons.
Things naturalists are unaware of usually, or they just ignore it.
You want models with explanatory power?But in this thread, we are looking for models with explanatory power.
Anita Jane Bryant (born March 25, 1940) is an American singer, former Miss Oklahoma beauty pageant winner, and former spokeswoman (brand ambassador) for the Florida Citrus Commission (marketing orange juice).
Wendy Wright is an activist for American conservative causes.
Remind me again later, will you please?Reminder to everyone: This is not a discussion about evolution. Evolution pro or con is off topic.
You want models with explanatory power?
Thank you, sir!I'm going to admit, I'm impressed. That was clever.
It's about relative weight.As did prehistoric fish. But a basilosaurus would be many, many times heavier than a simple fish.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?