- Jan 31, 2005
- 14,109
- 2,389
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Democrat
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
In an attempt to start a discussion, if I may respectfully ask, what did you think about what Pope Francis said on the environment, Fish?
St. Francis Xavier was a Jesuit saint, a missionary to far off lands, including, I believe, China. Nevertheless, I agree that Pope Francis chose his name for Francis of Assisi.
I think that much of what you said about the interconnectedness of all creatures reflecting God's image is very much the thought process that Teilhard de Chardin postulated.
What I liked about Laudato Si is that Francis traced so many of our environmental crises to economic causes, income inequality (especially between developed nations and the third world), and corporate and personal greed. It is true that those two factors are very much intertwined.
The Pope's recent message is consistent with his encyclical and his papacy. One wonders how well Catholics and others will accept it. I have this feeling that 50 or 100 years hence, when the damage we are doing to our "one and only home" is beyond our ability to repair, people will ask each other why no one was listening to the Pope and to the warnings of many others, and not acting on them. We see an example of this in the sea level coastal areas, including large cities and military installations, where the effects are already apparent and getting worse. Some in those places are calling for action, while others ignore it and refuse to believe the evidence lapping at their feet.
We must also try not to limit what the Pope is saying to just global warming. Even if that were not happening, there would still be the problem of environmental degradation caused by clear cutting, mining, over fishing, air, water and ground pollution, etc. Pope Francis emphasizes the problems these are causing, especially to the most vulnerable among us. We are mortgaging the future health and well-being of billions of people for the sake of bigger short term profits for an elite few.
Chief Seattle
I see climate change as one aspect of what the Pope discusses in his encyclical, but not the main point. Early in that document the Pope says the earth "now cries out to us because of the harm we have inflicted on her by our irresponsible use and abuse of the goods with which God has endowed her. We have come to see ourselves as her lords and masters, entitled to plunder her at will." This is his theme, with global warming one result of that abuse. Climate change is a problem that must be addressed now, but there are other issues, such as depletion of resources, that are urgent as well. As the Pope points out, much of what we are doing to our earth has great negative effect on humans, especially those in third world areas.I agree with you in principle about not limiting what the Pope is saying to global climate change, *but* I think it is the point he most emphasizes and the point that we should most emphasize. The first reason for that is because it is in fact the most urgent issue that is going to have the most direct impact on human life the most quickly.
The second is because climate change denialism is so widespread, and so is the idea that we have no corporate (ie collective) responsibility to mitigate it through laws and regulation, and so the point really has to be hammered home that its real, it is going to have a huge impact on human beings, and that we need to support governments, parties, candidates, regulations, laws, and treaties that mitigate it as much as we still can (Unfortunately the alternative is that we won't addresss the issue in a significant enough way), and tha this is the smart thing, the humane thing, and the only thing that is in accordance with the Catholic faith as propogated by the Surpreme Pontiff.
Otherwise, we wind up with people distilling it to (an actual reaction to the encyclical I saw from someone who shall remain nameless): "Give a hoot, don't pollute". It does say that in part, essentially, but its a lot more than that, and if we let the "more" part get drowned out by conservative ideologues, it will result in the greatest catastophe in human history. So, that's part of why I tend to keep an almost progamatic focus on global climate change, the mitigation of which will also result in cleaner air and so on and so forth as side effects, but very desireable ones!![]()
Having read this post, I was curious as to what relationship this Chief Seattle may or may not have had with the city of Seattle in Washington State. Turns out that the city was named after him! I'm sure Voices that Carry knew that, but I thought some others reading the thread might have, like me, not been aware of the connection, and might find it of interest.
Your dead cease to love you and the land of their nativity as soon as they pass the portals of the tomb and wander away beyond the stars. They are soon forgotten and never return. Our dead never forget this beautiful world that gave them being. They still love its verdant valleys, its murmuring rivers, its magnificent mountains, sequestered vales and verdant lined lakes and bays, and ever yearn in tender fond affection over the lonely hearted living, and often return from the happy hunting ground to visit, guide, console, and comfort them.