• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Capitalism is a Problem!

Inside Edge

Senior Member
Aug 3, 2004
789
80
Vancouver, BC
✟31,365.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
I second CaDan's post.

One of the concepts he passes over is something I think people are polarizing over: it isn't about the system or the individual, it's about the system and the individual. Each of us, under a free system like free-market capitalism must take both into account.

Yes, a poor person with morals and strong conviction may not resort to crime - the abstract system cannot be held accountable for a given crime. However, a given privaleged individual (I believe) should consider the circumstances. We need to understand that the system does create casualties, and we must be merciful. Don't blame the system for the crime, but understand that the system created the circumstances to make the crime a serious temptation (to any given person in those circumstances). Failing to recognize this goes back to the old adage: we create the theif and then punish him for being so.
 
Upvote 0

Philosoft

Orthogonal, Tangential, Tenuously Related
Dec 26, 2002
5,427
188
52
Southeast of Disorder
Visit site
✟6,503.00
Faith
Atheist
Lifesaver said:
To blame crime on poverty is completely wrong. There are a lot of honest poor people, and it is even insulting to say their situation inevitably leads to crime.
Probably why no one said that. This dichotomous thinking can get one into trouble.
Not to mention all the middle-class and rich criminals who exist as well...
Which ought to strongly suggest multiple sources of criminal motivation.
The cause of crime is the choice to do what is wrong. Only a stronger morality and faith can really help to bring that down.
Ah, yes, faith. Because one certainly can't reason that one shouldn't commit a crime. Please.

And once again, we just get to blame everything on "choice" without a care about how choices are made. All bad choices are ultimately unrestrained selfishness; keeps us from having to think critically about other proximate causes.
 
Upvote 0

CaDan

I remember orange CF
Site Supporter
Jan 30, 2004
23,298
2,833
The Society of the Spectacle
✟135,307.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Inside Edge said:
Yes, a poor person with morals and strong conviction may not resort to crime - the abstract system cannot be held accountable for a given crime. However, a given privaleged individual (I believe) should consider the circumstances. We need to understand that the system does create casualties, and we must be merciful. Don't blame the system for the crime, but understand that the system created the circumstances to make the crime a serious temptation (to any given person in those circumstances). Failing to recognize this goes back to the old adage: we create the theif and then punish him for being so.

If you want thieves, create property. If you want crimes, create laws. :)

Ursula LeGuin, "The Dispossessed" (quote from memory and probably not exactly correct).
 
Upvote 0

Nietzsche

Active Member
Jun 18, 2004
324
15
✟536.00
Faith
Atheist
Politics
US-Others
I was a member of a local Communist party for many years until i learned that capitalism wasn't as flawed as its said to be. Sure its got its problems but its the best thing we got till another form of the economy comes around.

I think the biggest thing you could do right now to better help you understand the system would be to read one of Friedmans books i suggest the book "free to chose" after reading this your probably better understand capitalism.
 
Upvote 0

fragmentsofdreams

Critical loyalist
Apr 18, 2002
10,358
431
22
CA
Visit site
✟43,828.00
Faith
Catholic
joebudda said:
I believe this.

I think the real people in control are not the politicians they are the heads of these multi-corps. They pay large sums of money to the politicians to pass whatever to further their own agenda. And we don’t even get to vote for them.

Even the media we rely on to inform us of problems get paid by these multi-corps through advertisements. How many times have you heard someone from the media say "we don’t want to offend our advertisers" in some degree or another?

The media isn't just owned through advertisements. The major networks are owned actually owned by large corporations (GE, Disney, etc.).
 
Upvote 0