• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Cannibalism and the Hunger Crisis

The_Master

Renegade Time Lord
May 24, 2008
3,066
4,100
Gallifrey
✟45,057.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
soylent_green07.jpg
 
Upvote 0

karisma

Regular Member
May 8, 2006
494
26
✟15,815.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Engaged
I dunno. It's just when I really think about it, it almost seems unethical not to promote cannibalism, while still protecting the rights of people and laws of the land to avoid murdering for food. I mean, if a family's dairy cow/goat died, it would almost a crime to dispose of the carcass when it could be used to feed a starving family. Why not humans?

Cannibalism is an ugly word in itself. Why not refer to it instead as something like "same-species nutrition?" Or something.

These are the things I ponder when I get really bored at work. :p
 
Upvote 0

Isambard

Nihilist Extrodinaire
Jul 11, 2007
4,002
200
38
✟27,789.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
I dunno. It's just when I really think about it, it almost seems unethical not to promote cannibalism, while still protecting the rights of people and laws of the land to avoid murdering for food. I mean, if a family's dairy cow/goat died, it would almost a crime to dispose of the carcass when it could be used to feed a starving family. Why not humans?

Cannibalism is an ugly word in itself. Why not refer to it instead as something like "same-species nutrition?" Or something.

These are the things I ponder when I get really bored at work. :p

As already mentioned, there's pragmatic reasons why cannibalizing the sickly and dead would not work.

That said, the best course of action would to turn the dead into compost to fertilize fields for future yields. Ditto for culling the sickly.
 
Upvote 0

lawtonfogle

My solace my terror, my terror my solace.
Apr 20, 2005
11,586
350
36
✟13,892.00
Faith
Christian
I think that any organisation that promoted cannibalism, even with the best intentions, would not be taken seriously. People have strong moral objections, for better or worse, to eating human flesh.

There are also health risks associated with cannibalism.


Moral objections sway easily to basic needs.
 
Upvote 0

lawtonfogle

My solace my terror, my terror my solace.
Apr 20, 2005
11,586
350
36
✟13,892.00
Faith
Christian
As already mentioned, there's pragmatic reasons why cannibalizing the sickly and dead would not work.

That said, the best course of action would to turn the dead into compost to fertilize fields for future yields. Ditto for culling the sickly.


Die of hunger, or maybe die after having a meal... If you are really that hungry, then I don't think health is still a concern.
 
Upvote 0

Bombila

Veteran
Nov 28, 2006
3,474
445
✟28,256.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Nevertheless, most people, in almost all presently existing cultures, won't turn to cannibalism, but will starve to death.

There's quite a bit of evidence that every culture that made cannibalism a 'normal' part of life, even if just as part of funerary ritual, paid a steep price, usually that of extinction, sometimes reduction by disease to the point of not being a viable society. Some paleontologists have found evidence that Neanderthals in a number of locations regularly practiced cannibalism, and may have contracted severe diseases as a result that hastened their demise.
 
Upvote 0