• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Can you explain-not mentioning the Name?

dignitized

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2005
24,931
759
✟29,618.00
ISBN: 0-916938-17-4
TITLE: THE BABYLON CONNECTION?

SUBJECT: Babylon/Catholic connection debunked. Misinformation and an over-emphasis of a "paganism" mixture with Christianity is brought to light through meticulous research of supposed and distorted sources.
PAGES: 121
PUBLISHER: Ralph Woodrow Evangelistic Association, Inc.
BINDING: Trade Paper
LIST PRICE: $8.00
PUBLICATION DATE: 1997

The above is a text you might wish to read.

Ralph Woodrow wrote the book Babylonian Mystery religion based off of the book the two babylons by your friend Alexander Hislop. Woodrow later withdrew the book babylonian mystery religion from print and published the book I have listed above.

EXCERPT: Suppose we could go back in time—back to the days of ancient Babylon. What kind of religion would we find being practiced there?

According to Alexander Hislop, we would find people attending mass, partaking of a little round wafer, worshipping a cross, going to confession, being baptized with water for the remission of sins, burning wax candles, and bowing before a divine Mother and Child. We would notice that places of worship featured a tower. Priests, wearing a circular tonsure, dressed in black garments, would give those who died the last rites. With monks and nuns in abundance, the Babylonians would be practicing essentially all the rites that are known today in the Roman Catholic Church!

According to Hislop, it all started with Nimrod and his wife Semiramis, thus the subtitle of The Two Babylons: "The Papal Worship Proved to Be the Worship of Nimrod and His Wife." But, any information about Nimrod and Semiramis in history books is, at best, sketchy. In the Bible, Nimrod "the mighty hunter," is only mentioned four times—and his wife is never mentioned! Nevertheless, Hislop claims to know all kinds of detailed information about Nimrod and his wife…. By now the reader may be asking the obvious question: Where does Hislop get all this information? The answer is clear. Based on mere similarities, he merges a variety of mythological stories together so that the hero in each becomes Nimrod.

The Bible says Nimrod was "a mighty one"; in mythology, Hercules was a mighty one or giant—so Hercules must have been Nimrod! Nimrod was known as "a mighty hunter"; in mythology, Orion is called the Hunter—so Orion must have been Nimrod! The building of the tower of Babel is commonly linked with Nimrod; in mythology, Kronos was the king of the Cyclops who invented tower-building—so Kronos must have been Nimrod!….

And so, by citing similarities, and ignoring differences, Hislop supposes that all kinds of goddesses were but variations of one goddess—a deified Semiramis of Babylon! But by this method, one could conclude that Mary Baker Eddy, Ellen G. White, and Aimee Semple McPherson were the same woman!….

Bearing in mind that Hislop’s subtitle is "The papal worship proved to be the worship of Nimrod and his wife," I have carefully checked the articles on "Nimrod" and "Semiramis" in many recognized reference works…. NOT ONE SAYS ANYTHING ABOUT NIMROD AND SEMIRAMIS BEING HUSBAND AND WIFE! Not only is there no mention of Nimrod being married to Semiramis, the information given tends to rule this out entirely. The Encyclopedia Britannica and The Encyclopedia Americana say Semiramis or Sammu-ramat, as she was called by the Assyrians, was the wife of Shamshi-Adad V who reigned 823-811 B.C. Nimrod by all accounts, would have lived much earlier than this! Instead of Nimrod and Semiramis being husband and wife, they did not even live in the same century!
 
Upvote 0
Jun 25, 2003
1,146
45
Tacoma, WA
Visit site
✟24,288.00
Faith
Marital Status
Single
Susan said:
I just have a few questions about this since I have decided that this seems kind of interesting (I read an article on neo-Puritanism that shared the same idea of never mentioning any Name that refers to Him in full)

So I have a few questions on that.

1: Is it normally seen as a binding requirement on non-Jewish Christians to leave letters or spaces out of the Name?

2: How far should we take this? Should a Christian who chooses to do this to show respect to His Name delete spaces from, say, the word "Father" in reference to Him, and should we also remove letters from the name of Jesus? (I'm sorry if mentioning the Name of our L_rd in full is offensive, :o :bow: I never posted in the Messianic forum much before) Should we delete letters from pronouns referring, like H_m instead if Him?

3: Is it seen as taking His Name in vain to mention it reverently in prayer?

4: Are we held at fault if we see or hear the Name taken in vain and do nothing about it like rebuke the person or rend our clothes and say prayers of mourning?

I have basically no idea about this doctrine: Until I read the Puritan article, I believed that I was home safe in regards to the Third Commandment as long as I didn't curse or swear myself and I didn't hear large amounts of the Name being used vainly by others in a specified amount of time. Now I'm worried about whether my prayers even offend Him. ;;^.^;;

Greetings Susan,

From my reading from site to site I have came to understanding that the Israelite Leaders who were in charge of Teaching the Torah came up with Fence Laws which surround the Main Torah so as to make it harder for the People of YHWH to break His Torah. Now after quite a while they had so many fence laws that it became a burden to the people. Now at some point in history they stopped using YHWH's name so as to not use His name in Vain and therefore taught the people the same.

Shalom,
Tag
 
Upvote 0