• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Can you be Christian and believe in evolution?

Status
Not open for further replies.

olgamc

Active Member
Mar 10, 2024
392
54
47
Huntsville
✟15,044.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I appreciate the graciousness of your response. Forgive me that I've failed to be as gracious.
no worries, you were just passionate
Perhaps my lingering perplexity is a concern for how we, as Christians juggling Scripture and Science, are perceived. Or better, how our MESSAGE to each other and the lost is perceived.

I was once asked by a mocking atheist if I believed in aliens. I said I believe that if God wanted to make aliens, He could have. My friend who was in the group and who is also an atheist said to me "that was a good answer".

I think that mockers will be mockers until the Lord chooses to save them. We don't save them, it's not our job. But I don't think anyone sees us juggling two opposing forces except for people who believe that science is from the devil. (However they define science. In this case it's evolution. In the case of covid it was vaccinations...) The world doesn't see us juggling two forces, because they don't believe in two forces. They just see us as being hard-headed, brainwashed, and not able to reason. And if they see us fighting between ourselves about what we believe, how can they believe us? All they see is that we don't know ourselves what we believe. We claim to know the truth, but we fight about what truth is.

Also we are not going to prove God to anyone by arguing. We can only show them God by loving them. And if we make enemies out of them or judge them, we are not loving. And we are not supposed to judge unbelievers to begin with. Look at Acts 17:22-23. It's one of my favorite verses. Paul notices statues to gods. They are idol worshippers. But Paul doesn't say "how could you, this is so wrong". No, first he takes time to learn what they believe. Then he complements them on being religious in every way. Then he finds something he can grab on to - a statue to the unknown god - and uses that to tell them about the real God and His son.

Besides, we can use science to confirm the Bible. Imagine if an atheist comes in and says "I know that earth is billions of years old", and we say "well you are wrong". He is just going to walk out. But we can say "Sure. Earth can be both young and old depending on how you look.". We are not compromising on anything, because the statement is completely true. And we are not acknowledging that oh yeah, physical earth is definitely billions of years old. We are not saying anything actually, one way or another, but we are drawing him into a conversation. We can say things like "Darwin discovered that life developed from plants to water creatures to land creatures, and guess what, that's in the Bible!" But there is certainly a limit to how much we can affirm, because we have to tell the truth. So we have to know the truth and where the boundaries are between "could be" and "nope, no way". If someone says to me "I can marry whoever I want because I evolved from a snail and snails are hermaphrodites" - I honestly don't know how to answer that, except to say that well that's your opinion, but I know there is God who created them separate and special and they are much much more than a snail.
 
Upvote 0

olgamc

Active Member
Mar 10, 2024
392
54
47
Huntsville
✟15,044.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
What about Acts 17:26? "From one man he created all the nations throughout the whole earth. He decided beforehand when they should rise and fall, and he determined their boundaries."

Thank you by the way for posting that video. I haven't watched it yet, but I will.
 
Upvote 0

olgamc

Active Member
Mar 10, 2024
392
54
47
Huntsville
✟15,044.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
All people are people. Not sure if I gave the impression that I thought otherwise.
I guess my question is, if Adam had a mom and a dad, and Adam is the first person with a soul, does that mean that his mom and dad are people without a soul?
 
Upvote 0

Job 33:6

Well-Known Member
Jun 15, 2017
9,412
3,198
Hartford, Connecticut
✟359,161.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I guess my question is, if Adam had a mom and a dad, and Adam is the first person with a soul, does that mean that his mom and dad are people without a soul?
What Bible verse are you referencing when you talk about Adams soul. I try to speak in terms of what the Bible says. If you don't have a verse, I can respond anyway, but it would help me understand your approach if I had scripture to frame your question.
 
Upvote 0

Job 33:6

Well-Known Member
Jun 15, 2017
9,412
3,198
Hartford, Connecticut
✟359,161.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Well in Greek it doesn't say "from one man", it just says "from one". KJV I think says blood.

I usually view this passage in relation to Noah, because the Bible says that nations split after flood. There's a section of the Bible typically titled "the table of nations", And then in Babel they were scattered. Then by Deuteronomy 32, God established the princes of the nations.

But many translations say something like:
‭‭Acts 17:26 ESV‬‬
[26] And he made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth, having determined allotted periods and the boundaries of their dwelling place,

‭‭Acts 17:26 NASB2020‬‬
[26] and He made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth, having determined their appointed times and the boundaries of their habitation,

‭‭Acts 17:26 NIV‬‬
[26] From one man he made all the nations, that they should inhabit the whole earth; and he marked out their appointed times in history and the boundaries of their lands.

So I would interpret this passage as Paul, who also does not know that earth is a globe and is speaking with respect to the near east and Mediterranean, and he's saying that from Noah, descendents of Noah came to be.

But his main message is to point out that all things, nations, people, and otherwise, come from God. Even if he isn't aware of native Americans on the other side of the ocean or down in Australia. It's a theological statement. It's not really a statement about biological descent or anything like that.
 
Upvote 0

davetaff

Well-Known Member
Mar 4, 2024
420
72
82
South Wales
✟61,649.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi Gods sabbath rest is 1000 years its Christ's millennium reign its when God hands everything over to Jesus Christ to finish the creation of man in the image of God.

Love and Peace
Dave
 
Upvote 0

davetaff

Well-Known Member
Mar 4, 2024
420
72
82
South Wales
✟61,649.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Thank you for your reply the point I'm trying to make is do we have to be an academic to understand God's word or is it enough to read the word and let God explain it I have spent quite a lot of money on books by academics they have all ended in the bin what I found was they all seemed to contradict one another so one day I sat down opened my bible at Genesis 1 and read it from cover to cover and have never looked back.

Love and peace
Dave
 
Reactions: Dan1988
Upvote 0

olgamc

Active Member
Mar 10, 2024
392
54
47
Huntsville
✟15,044.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Genesis 2:7 - God breathed into his nostrils a breath of life and he became a living being. If what you say is true, then Adam was already a biologically alive being, so this would be talking about God making him spiritually alive - giving him a soul. Which to me means that his mom and dad and siblings and every other human on earth living up to that moment had no soul.
 
Upvote 0

olgamc

Active Member
Mar 10, 2024
392
54
47
Huntsville
✟15,044.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Aristotel lived some 350 years before Christ, so the idea that the world is a sphere was known in Paul’s time. I don’t know what Paul personally knew or thought, but I think that it’s an assumption that he was talking about the geographic area. But it’s just my opinion. But ok, let’s assume that all the nations of the whole earth refers to a geographic area. That would mean that the flood did not wipe out all of earth, but only the known geographic are. That would mean that after the flood there would be descendants of Noah and a bunch of other people. And if at least one of those people travelled from their region to the area which Paul was referring to, and had a children, than God did not create all nations in the known world from one man Noah. This is why I think Paul is referring to Adam.
 
Upvote 0

olgamc

Active Member
Mar 10, 2024
392
54
47
Huntsville
✟15,044.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Beautiful! I love how God works. That is exactly my point. We don’t need to understand everything and we don’t need to argue, because there is no conflict. We are all arguing and contradicting each other because we are looking at things from different perspectives. Both perspectives can be true at the same time, all we need to do is accept that multiple perspectives exist.
 
Upvote 0

olgamc

Active Member
Mar 10, 2024
392
54
47
Huntsville
✟15,044.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So in other words, what you are saying is that Paul says God created all the people and nations. Right? But then why does he say “from one man”? He could have just said “God created”, but he doesn’t. Does that mean that “from one man” is important? I think it is.

Here’s what I think the Bible says. God created a man, Adam, different from animals - in God’s image and with a soul. He was an actual physical person and not an allegory. I believe that Adam was created mortal, but as long as he could eat from the tree of life he was immortal. I believe that God created a physical Eve from Adam. She was the same as Adam - made not an animal, made in God’s image, mortal but having access to the tree of life. This one man Adam sinned, along with his wife, and both were forbidden to eat from the tree of life. Therefore sin entered the human kind (which at the time consisted of 2 people), and with sin, death. Then Adam and Eve had kids according to their kind - not animals, created in God’s image, with a soul, sinful, and mortal, and not having access to the tree of life. Then God sent His son to take a form of one physical man to redeem all human kind from sin and death.

Here’s what I don’t think the Bible says. How exactly God made the world. How long exactly it took. How exactly He made Adam.

God doesn’t spell it all out for us because it’s not important to our salvation. We can study things or not study things, we can know more or we can know less, and the different disciplines we study can disagree with each other and still not be in conflict. There is something we should not do, in my opinion. We should not present our interpretation of God’s word as God’s word. Gods word is inerrant. Our interpretation is not. We should try to understand the Scripture, and for that we do have to interpret it, but I don’t believe that we should say “I am right and you are wrong”, unless the person contradicts something very obvious. Like if someone said “the Bible says that devil is the good guy”, I would say that they are obviously wrong.

Oh, and just to clarify. Above I presented what I think. Doesn’t mean that it’s flawless, and I didn’t say that I am right and you are wrong. I just said this is what I think, this makes sense to me. That’s all. And when I ask you questions, I am not asking them because I am right, I am analyzing your opinion and my opinion, to see where they are the same, where they differ, why they differ, and is it important.

I find that people hear me ask questions and assume that I think I am right and they are wrong. That’s not why I ask questions, but I am evaluating a different opinion before I decide whether or not I need to change mine.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

tonychanyt

24/7 Christian
Oct 2, 2011
6,061
2,239
Toronto
Visit site
✟196,430.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Came to existence.
"Create" and "came to existence" are distinct concepts. Can you rephrase your paragraph with the appropriate wording? I prefer to argue in precise wording. It will also clarify things in your head.
 
Upvote 0

olgamc

Active Member
Mar 10, 2024
392
54
47
Huntsville
✟15,044.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
If there is no creator, then nothing was created. You need to define what you mean by *created
"Create" and "came to existence" are distinct concepts. Can you rephrase your paragraph with the appropriate wording? I prefer to argue in precise wording. It will also clarify things in your head.

Ok, I actually see what you mean. I am going to make a distinction between create data and derive information, where derive information means organize data into some structure.

let p1 = there exists a set of x such that x causes data to come to existence and x does not organize data. (all kinds of random forces)
let p2 = there exists a set of y such that y organizes data. (all kinds of machines that are able to derive meaning from data)
let p3 = if both p1 and p2 are true, there exists at least one x that creates data for at least one y. (some random force generates data that some machine is able to organize)

is p3 true?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

olgamc

Active Member
Mar 10, 2024
392
54
47
Huntsville
✟15,044.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hey. Thank you for posting the video, I watched it. I have a few comments.

1. I want to point out what he says around minute 35. "look outside the box and not confine yourselves to only one option". That is exactly what I've been saying! Scientists - evolution exists, God does not. Some Christians - God exists, evolution does not. Ok Christians. You want the scientists to open up their mind to other possibilities? But you have a log in your own eye. Why don't you open up your eyes to other possibilities, namely that both God and evolution can exist. And I am talking about the mechanics of evolution and not the theory of evolution, because we already know that the theory exists. It might not be true, but it exists.

2. Around minute 30 he defined different probability terms. At 33:59 he says that scientists confuse the terms and say "must have happened because it could have happened". But we Christians do the same!!! "God could have created things instantly, so He must have created the world instantly."

3. At 39:57 - "functional information cannot be generated from purely physical properties". Why did he say that? How does he know? I want proof. Then he says "it just has never been observed". Wait, what just happened? Did they just say "we haven't see it, therefore it is impossible"? According to their own definition of probability terms, that not what "we haven't seen it" means.

See? This is why I get so frustrated with these creation videos. The creators of these videos contradict themselves and don't notice logs in their own eyes.
 
Upvote 0

olgamc

Active Member
Mar 10, 2024
392
54
47
Huntsville
✟15,044.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Is x a set or an element in a set? What was the highest level of math that you took?
I didn't take math in north america except for the ai course. I took one year of university before I came here, but I don't know how that translates to a north american curriculum. Also our notation is a bit different, and also it was many many years ago. LOL

let p1 = there exists a set X of elements x such that x causes data to come to existence and x does not organize data. (all kinds of random forces)
let p2 = there exists a set Y of elements y such that y organizes data. (all kinds of machines that are able to derive meaning from data)
let p3 = if both p1 and p2 are true, there exists at least one x that creates data for at least one y. (some random force generates data that some machine is able to organize)
 
Upvote 0

tonychanyt

24/7 Christian
Oct 2, 2011
6,061
2,239
Toronto
Visit site
✟196,430.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Sure. Now you need to prove p3 is true. If you like, I can assume that P3=p3 is true. What is next?

PS I reserve the right to ask you to prove p3 at some time in the future
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

olgamc

Active Member
Mar 10, 2024
392
54
47
Huntsville
✟15,044.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You're still trying to marry two opposing world views together, but the two will never be united in harmony.
That's where I disagree. I am not trying to marry two opposing views together. Opposing views would be "God exists" vs "God does not exist". Of course those conflict, which is why in my original answer I said that we can believe in aspects of the theory of evolution.

Ok, let me explain. You said we can read books on cooking, right? Cooking is chemistry. So we can perform a chemical reaction in our kitchen and call it soup. To us cooks, a soup is a dish that we can eat that consists of vegetables and maybe meat. But to our friend the chemist who is invited for dinner, soup is a mixture of chemicals. Then our friend the chemist says to us, hey, have you heard of the primordial soup? Are they talking about a dish with vegetables and meat? Or are they talking about a mixture of chemicals? Can we, from our perspective of what soup is, say to them - hey that's not soup? Well that's what we are doing. We are only seeing things from one perspective, and calling everyone else wrong.

Ok, another example. You and I are friends. I have a fish tank that I've been setting up for the past year and I am super proud of it. I invite some friends over, including you, to show it off. My friend the biologist looks at it and says "I see a bunch of guppies that poop. I also see through a microscope some bacteria that converts guppy poop into inorganic nutrients. I also see some plants (starts naming plants) that take up nutrients and produce oxygen for the fish. Oh, and by the way, that's a great little eco system you got going, but it will all eventually die.". A chemist looks at the tank and says "I see a process called photosynthesis by which the chemicals from the substrate and carbon dioxide from the water are converted to plant cells and oxygen...." and he keep muttering, but I tune him out. A physicist looks at the tank and says "I see that there is a heat exchange between cooler and warmer water and I see a bunch of matter that has always existed and will always exist".

Then Jesus walks into a room and says "hey folks, guess what? I made all that".

Are me, my friends, and Jesus in conflict? Who is right? Who is wrong? What should you believe about the fish tank?
 
Reactions: Dan1988
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.