I disagree because Internet Warriors throw around "evidence please" for the most ridiculous of statements, things everyone might simply take for granted. If I cite something like that, and you're not sure, Google is your friend. Otherwise, it's Internet Tinker Toys for the warriors to play with.
Additionally, this is not a court of law. It's a place for discussion.
It is helpful if people could have a better understanding of journalism and media. Wolff wrote about what he heard. If Joe WH staffer said to Wolff that Ivanka said her Father said XYZ, that means that. The truth is what he heard. Whether Ivanka actually said that can be debated as to whether she said it, said it but didn’t mean it, or said it but it was taken out of context.On a related note, in regards to supporting your evidence, if you source that Wolff guy's book (or a source which does so), then you should be figuratively shot out of a cannon from this sub-forum.
Michael Wolff note says he doesn't know if Trump book is all true - B…
The author of the explosive new Trump book says he can't be sure if parts of it are true
Michael Wolff, the author of "Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House," included a note at the start that casts significant doubt on the reliability of the specifics contained in the rest of its pages.
Several of his sources, he says, were definitely lying to him, while some offered accounts that flatly contradicted those of others.
"Go look it up yourself" is not conducive to discussion.
"SGOYT"? Solitaire Games At Your Table?
I definitely sympathize with you, people do take advantage, and do troll, and there's even evidence out there to suggest that some people are PAID to troll.
Opinions do vary, but it is quite possible to hold an opinion that is flat out wrong.
True. If I don't back it up you are free to reject it. I'll happily take responsibility for that.
Then you agree to the terms! We won't have to put you on ignore.
Maybe that's the best response to someone woefully uninformed about the topic.
I'm not trying to be ironic here, but please, do go on. I'd love to see some of this evidence, especially for this forum.
On a related note, in regards to supporting your evidence, if you source that Wolff guy's book (or a source which does so), then you should be figuratively shot out of a cannon from this sub-forum.
Michael Wolff note says he doesn't know if Trump book is all true - B…
The author of the explosive new Trump book says he can't be sure if parts of it are true
Michael Wolff, the author of "Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House," included a note at the start that casts significant doubt on the reliability of the specifics contained in the rest of its pages.
Several of his sources, he says, were definitely lying to him, while some offered accounts that flatly contradicted those of others.
It's really fascinating stuff.
Okay. But to be clear, I shouldn't expect you to be held to this standard?
So I should also not hold you to this standard?
So we should not hold you to this standard?
Then you agree to the terms! We won't have to put you on ignore.
Thank you for going above and beyond what I was asking for. I was aware of Russian and other eastern European troll operations. I've read that Albania is a hub of activity where you have trained but unempolyed IT professionals paying their bills by writing bot scripts.
I thought you were referring to something else though.