As long as you continue to assert what the Reformed position is, especially when you are patently wrong in so doing, there are those of us within the conservative Reformed tradition (which is not the PC(USA) position) that are going to take exception. I get that you are
winsomely just asking for clarifications, but the underlying rhetoric that implies how rationalistic or modern, or logical, not aligned with Scripture, etc., we Reformed are is not being lost on the discerning. Your behavior needlessly provokes divisiveness within the community of Presbyterians participating or viewing this discussion. After all, we are all unprofitable servants, and often given over to sin borne of inflamed passions about that which we hold dear. I prefer we avoid the near occasion of sin wherever possible. Your approach is making that problematic. Those of us within conservative Presbyterianism (see
NAPARC) are being tempted by your methods to weigh in, said responses will, unfortunately at times, be at the expense of the views of mainline PC(USA) denomination. I would prefer to keep the peace within Presbyterianism where possible.
Our confessions explain what we hold to be accurate summaries of the teachings of Scripture on this topic and many more. In another thread I pointed you to them as relates to the OP. If you have a question about the specifics of these confessional summaries of Scripture, then ask and you will be answered. If you want to weigh in on the veracity of these confessional summaries, seeking "proof" beyond what they offer perspicuously therein, I am afraid that just will not do. You rhetorical tactics are quite close if not already
brinking herein. I have asked you as politely as I am able to not practice these methods. There are plenty of CF forums wherein you are free per the rules to take Reformed views to task and, if we are so moved, we will respond. This particular forum is not the place for the methods you are using.