Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Hi, JustHisKid. Thank you for your encouragement. This thread has been a revealing exercise. Going through the comments you can tell who has given their hearts to Christ completely and those who have not thought through what it really means to follow Christ. Thanks again.I absolutely agree with you. I laugh when "Christians" take up arms to fight ISIS. Huh? That doesn't even make sense. Store up your treasures in heaven and do not invest in this world.
.
Praise the Lord, brother. Keep up the faith and the good work you are doing in Mexico!My wife and I are Americans who are happily retired in Mexico. We both love the US (We won the Women's World Cup in soccer yesterday!!!!!) and Mexico, but we serve neither. We serve Christ here in Mexico, just as we served Him in the US.
Frankly, I don't think you have read my responses to other people, and I am tired of repeating what I have already said to them to you.
I pointed out in the beginning that the context is God and mammon, but it is a fair principle to apply it to other things, specifically civil government.
Fundamentalists like to make a big deal about how the founding fathers were Christians. While I believe some were, clearly many others were not. Regardless, this country was founded upon rebellion to its mother country, Great Britain, over taxes and other issues the pale in comparison to the abuses of the US government today. Yet, American Christians are so brain washed into believing that obedience to government is God's will that they interpret disobedience to the government as disobedience to God Himself. If that were true, our whole nation's history is founded in disobedience to God. My thread is intended to get people thinking about who we are in Christ and our attitudes towards civil governments. Never in this thread or elsewhere have I promoted rebellion. Instead I have consistently stated that we are to preach the gospel and change the nation by changing individual hearts. But, I believe, American Christians need to be disconnected to this thinking of blind obedience to civil government and think through how God thinks about governments in general.
I'm not pretending anything here. I freely admit I haven't read every post in the thread. I'd be curious to know how many, besides you, that posted here have read all of them. If you think there is a post that cogently articulates your position, give me the number and I'll read it.
On the flip side, I will again point out that I have repeatedly asked you to provide support for your view, and I get nothing. Simply making a statement means nothing. Either give me the logic behind your opinion or give me the Bible passages that demonstrate this is more than your opinion. If to you discussion only means talking with people who agree with you, then I suppose we should draw this to a close.
But I will note I have repeatedly indicated the areas where we seem to agree. The problem is that I can't it let pass without comment that I think you are trying to support the right view with the wrong reasons.
Why? Some might call that taking things out of context.
I generally agree with you. But let me ask you a few questions:
1) Is the form of American government bad or is it people that have caused the problems? Or is it something else?
2) If the issue from question #1 were corrected, do you think people could serve the U.S. government and God?
3) When is disobedience to the government justified?
4) Would Joseph have been justified in disobeying his Egyptian masters?
5) If you think he was justified, then why didn't he?
We choose what we discuss. No one is under any obligation to answer any question on a forum. In this case, I had answered his questions previously, but his questions were not about the topic of the thread, which is, Can you serve two masters? which Jesus says we can not.Do you think it is good for honest intellectual discussion, for you to decide which questions people ask?
We choose what we discuss. No one is under any obligation to answer any question on a forum. In this case, I had answered his questions previously, but his questions were not about the topic of the thread, which is, Can you serve two masters? which Jesus says we can not.
We choose what we discuss. No one is under any obligation to answer any question on a forum.
In this case, I had answered his questions previously, but his questions were not about the topic of the thread, which is, Can you serve two masters? which Jesus says we can not.
Thank you. I don't.Then don't serve two masters.
Resa,Well, sort of. No one can force you to answer anything, but starting a topic and then refusing to discuss it is bad form. Don't worry. Other than this thread I have no plans to attempt a discussion with you again.
I did address the question. My answer was that people can serve both God and government. Saying that does not mean I believe disobedience is always wrong. It becomes a hair-splitting exercise when disobedience has reached the point where one no longer serves the government, but I disagree that it's all or nothing. You seemed to agree that it doesn't have to be all or nothing.
Further, I share your disappointment in American government. I also share your feeling that the more distant it becomes, the worse it gets, and so the Federal government is the most disappointing of all.
The questions that followed were simply part of the discussion. Questions aid understanding, and that is really all I was after. I'm sorry that my reaction to "anarchy" put you off, but at least you now understand words can carry strong implications. Trying to appropriate a word to a more benign meaning doesn't usually work very well. It may not be true to the literal Greek roots of the word, but the modern meaning has strong connotations of violence and terrorism.
Regardless, I put that aside and tried to ask you some basic questions about where your ideas come from. My reason for asking is that you seem to take the "two masters" verses out of context. I actually did search the thread for the answers you claim you gave. Of course I could have missed something, but I don't see any explanations of your view (unless you mean post #12). All I found was your comment in the OP that the verses can be applied elsewhere and your comment to me that you've explained it. I don't see any actual explanations.
But apparently the well is already poisoned. So, peace to you. I hope you find what you need.
I generally agree with you. But let me ask you a few questions:
1) Is the form of American government bad or is it people that have caused the problems? Or is it something else?
2) If the issue from question #1 were corrected, do you think people could serve the U.S. government and God?
3) When is disobedience to the government justified?
4) Would Joseph have been justified in disobeying his Egyptian masters?
5) If you think he was justified, then why didn't he?
Praise the Lord for your testimony, Greeble. A Christians whose first loyalty is Christ is comfortable in any nation because you are always a member of the Kingdom of God. As you said, the Christian community spans the world. Praise God!I'm sorry, but my first reaction to your op was "huh?"
I am the child, niece, grand niece of missionaries. My church currently supports one school in Liberia and numerous mission trips to various countries in Central America and Haiti. (Along with the poor in our own community) Some of my best siblings have duo citizenship. The Christian community spans the world, and we can and do delight in each other's company in service to each other.
Today is July 4th, which is the day the United States declared its independence from Great Britain. In my own journey of life I had gone from a rebellious pagan against my country, to a believer in Christ who was encouraged by other Christians to be a patriot for my country, to a biblical anarchist. When I was a patriot, I grimaced at the thought of Americans celebrating Cinco de Mayo (5th of May) which is the day that Mexico declared its Independence from Spain. Also, how can Mexicans emigrate to the USA to become American citizens and still honor Cinco de Mayo? But the truth is, it has been capitalized by American merchants seeking another excuse to have a sale to lure customers in to shop.
Which brings me to the point of my question. Jesus said that a man can not serve two masters. He will either hate the one and love the other, or hold to one and despise the other (Matt. 6:24). The context of his statement is either serving God or money, but as a principle it could be any two things in opposition.
I am asking this question because of another thread on the forum which declared that Jesus was an anarchist. The author of that thread did not really invite conversation, which is why, I believe, it never took off. But, as I said in the beginning of this thread, I am now a biblical anarchist, by which I do not mean I believe in rebellion to earthly governments.
Instead, I mean I have one master, my Father in heaven, who is my king and I am a subject of his kingdom. How then, could I be a patriot to an earthly government at the same time I am a patriot to my Father's kingdom? So how do you all reconcile these two things? For I do not believe that such expressions as "for God and country" are biblical. Neither do I believe that God blesses any political organization, let alone America. He blesses those that are in Christ, since it is in Christ only that all blessings flow. What do you think?
Hardly. I see many celebrations in the park and streets.But the truth is, it has been capitalized by American merchants seeking another excuse to have a sale to lure customers in to shop.
Buying food for a barbecue, buying fireworks, is not shopping?Hardly. I see many celebrations in the park and streets.
I've never seen one in a store.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?