Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I have a recipe for black pudding that uses 2 cups of pig blood. I was going to get some in a tube but I didn't know if Christians are bound to not eat blood?
I find the main different between the above perspective and my own is premise of understanding, that's all.I cited a lot of verses to support my position, so if you think that they would have disagreed, then please explain why.
The Bible does not say anything about efficiency being relevant or about the Mosaic Law being inefficient, and if you think that this was evidenced by Scripture, then please cite it. The Mosaic straightforwardly did was it was given to do and did not do what it was not given to do. Everything taught in the NT is based on and in accordance with what was taught in the NT, so there is nothing that was improved. You can't have a better set of instructions for how to walk in God's ways without following a better God with better ways.
In Matthew 23:23, Jesus said that faith is one of the weightier matters of the Law, so following it is about expressing our faith in God to guide us in how to rightly live. Living by faith is always associated with living in obedience to God's will, such as with the examples of saving faith listed in Hebrews 11, whereas disobedience to God's instructions is referred to as breaking faith, such as in Numbers 5:6. In James 2:17-18, he said that faith without works is dead and that he would show his faith by his works, so obedience to God's Law is what faith looks like, which is why Paul said in Romans 2:13 that it is only the doers of the Law who will be justified and not the hearers. Trusting God through refusing to follow His instructions is not a concept that is found anywhere in the Bible.
There are certainly night and day differences between how health it is to eat clean and unclean animals and there are an incredible amount of parasites and diseases that have been transferred to humans through eating unclean animals, so perhaps health had something to do with it. However, in 1 Peter 1:16, we are told to have a holy conduct for God is holy, which is a quote from Leviticus where God was giving instructions for how to have a holy conduct, which includes Leviticus 11:44-45, so God associated His holiness with refraining from eating unclean animals and following those instructions is about testifying to the holiness of our God. So there is much more to it than being survival information for starting up a new settlement.
Not eating blood was for Jews of the old covenant, not for Christians. There is no law against eating blood for Christians in fact we drink Christ's blood and many take that strictly literal.
Go ahead and drink it---
Act_15:20 But that we write unto them, that they abstain from pollutions of idols, and from fornication, and from things strangled, and from blood.
Act_15:29 That ye abstain from meats offered to idols, and from blood, and from things strangled, and from fornication: from which if ye keep yourselves, ye shall do well. Fare ye well.
Act_21:25 As touching the Gentiles which believe, we have written and concluded that they observe no such thing, save only that they keep themselves from things offered to idols, and from blood, and from strangled, and from fornication.
I agree with commentators that say all these things were part of pagan religious rituals fully unrelated to recipes for blood sausage. They also drank the blood uncooked and raw. It isn't a prohibition from using blood in recipes.
Well then--eat it---you will never answer to me for what you do! It clearly says to stay away from idols AND from things strangled AND from fornication And from blood. So as long as those are not being done in a pagan ritual I guess you're good to go on them all.
Context matters. The part about blood is definitely regarding how the pagans would drink blood during religious rituals. It is way out of context to say they opposed making and eating blood sausages.
Right! Take one out of 4 and apply it to something else---
That's what you have done. I have kept it in context with the other 3.
u should just have told him that the pepporoni pieces were made from the un-kosher part of those kosher pigs. that probbly would have stopped him.Yes, He did. I told him I was going to tell his Rabbi. "You don't know who he is!" As he walked away grinning and munching on the pizza.
u should just have told him that the pepporoni pieces were made from the un-kosher part of those kosher pigs. that probbly would have stopped him.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?