Warden_of_the_Storm
Well-Known Member
- Oct 16, 2015
- 15,338
- 7,532
- 31
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Deist
- Marital Status
- Single
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
My "opinion" is based on the fact that God created everything perfect; including Adam & Eve.
God said we were supposed to eat plants. Nothing in Genesis about milk or dairy products.
If I valued your opinion I would be offended by the implication that some of my answers are dishonest.Now I consider this an honest answer.
I predicted your cough, or its equivalent, so don't get overly smug.* cough *
Well, you have it half right. Nature is very much about competition. However, you missed the other half. Nature is very much about cooperation.There is none.
Bacteria emit mycotoxins to repel invading bacteria.
One country emits their "mycotoxins" to repel invading countries.
The scale is just larger on our end.
Well, you have it half right. Nature is very much about competition. However, you missed the other half. Nature is very much about cooperation.I believe it's called either survival of the fittest, or fight or flight.
Mankind has the power of reflection and self-control. (This can be used to do sensible things like reclassifying Pluto, or restricting the use of certain drugs when context sensitive problems are identified.)What's the difference between nature's mycotoxins and mankinds' weapons of mass destruction?
Most of us understand your position. We just don't like wading through it when it is that deep.Finally!
Someone who understands!
No.
You can watch Inherit the Wind sixty times, until you know what they're going to do and say by heart.
That doesn't mean you're the cause of their actions.
Satan's plan, yes.
The decoding as you call it is inherit to the chemical structure of the molecule. It's a physical process not a mental abstract.But Did the sequences originate before the decoding mechanism did? Or at the same time? hmmmm?
FROM NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE:The decoding as you call it is inherit to the chemical structure of the molecule. It's a physical process not a mental abstract.
The letters of DNA is something we apply to DNA not truly a part of it.
What in the world is "dishonest luck?" That would be akin to your opponent getting 50 royal flushes in a row dealt to him. That's what getting all the correct mutations in the right order to "evolve" an eye isWhat in the world is "dishonest luck?"
I'm beginning to get the impression that you want to prove that the theory of evolution denies God's authorship of our being and all this empty huffing and puffing about "random" and "luck" is just a Trojan Horse.
Fortunately, they don't all have to be in any particular order.What in the world is "dishonest luck?" That would be akin to your opponent getting 50 royal flushes in a row dealt to him. That's what getting all the correct mutations in the right order to "evolve" an eye is
No? You mean things like blood would be in place b4 arteries? The heart would exist before blood, joint cartilage before bones?Fortunately, they don't all have to be in any particular order.
No? You mean things like blood would be in place b4 arteries? The heart would exist before blood, joint cartilage before bones?
You seem to have this odd perception that the first heart looked and worked more or less the same as a present day heart. Or that the first blood had pretty much the same composition and properties of the blood circulating in your body today. Now that would be a remarkable thing to discover and would pretty well consign evolutionary theory to the dustbin. However, as @partinobodycular has pointed out, you keep attacking strawmen.No? You mean things like blood would be in place b4 arteries? The heart would exist before blood, joint cartilage before bones?
Here is a suggestion. There are many weaknesses and areas of doubt in modern evolutionary theory. You haven't come close to any of them yet. I recommend you go spend four or five years of serious study of the field, then come back and ask some genuinely challenging questions, instead of indulging in the usual anti-evolution drivel. I can assure you that will earn you some respect for your arguments.
so tell us how the first heart came to be, did it work w out blood? Or was blood somewhere else and miraculously integrated w the heart?You seem to have this odd perception that the first heart looked and worked more or less the same as a present day heart. Or that the first blood had pretty much the same composition and properties of the blood circulating in your body today. Now that would be a remarkable thing to discover and would pretty well consign evolutionary theory to the dustbin. However, as @partinobodycular has pointed out, you keep attacking strawmen.
Here is a suggestion. There are many weaknesses and areas of doubt in modern evolutionary theory. You haven't come close to any of them yet. I recommend you go spend four or five years of serious study of the field, then come back and ask some genuinely challenging questions, instead of indulging in the usual anti-evolution drivel. I can assure you that will earn you some respect for your arguments.
so give us your version.No, they don't have to be in order, in fact they almost certainly won't be, but it doesn't make any difference. You're beating a straw man... please, just let him die.
I haven't finished this paper yet, but it looks interesting and I believe it will answer your question.so tell us how the first heart came to be, did it work w out blood? Or was blood somewhere else and miraculously integrated w the heart?
so give us your version.
I have not studied the evolution of the heart, or of blood. I'll make a commitment to find material you can read to inform yourself about it, if you make a commitment to make a serious study of that material.so tell us how the first heart came to be, did it work w out blood? Or was blood somewhere else and miraculously integrated w the heart?
so tell us how the first heart came to be, did it work w out blood? Or was blood somewhere else and miraculously integrated w the heart?
No. DNA is made of nucleotides.Dna DOES contain symbols/ signs : ATGC.
These are letters
These get translated during transcription.
I guess you don’t like biologists who refer to it as a code because that is what it is,
It is encoded, and gets translated, fits the definition of code perfectly.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?