Imagine a conversation like this:
Person A: "Nicole Brown Simpson got what she deserved".
Person B: "Your statement is highly offensive! It justifies murder!".
Or one like this:
Person A: "If O.J. Simpson killed Nicole Brown Simpson, it was justified".
Person B: "Your statement is highly offensive! It justifies murder!".
The two statements by Person A are Person A's opinion. Person B asserts that the statements justify something--something that he/she does not think is/was justified.
To me, all of this begs a question: Can a person's opinion justify anything?
Maybe it is just me, but it makes no sense to me to say that somebody's opinon justifies anything. It's just his/her opinion! Since when did anybody have the authority, power or ability to justify anything by stating his/her opinion?
Person A: "Nicole Brown Simpson got what she deserved".
Person B: "Your statement is highly offensive! It justifies murder!".
Or one like this:
Person A: "If O.J. Simpson killed Nicole Brown Simpson, it was justified".
Person B: "Your statement is highly offensive! It justifies murder!".
The two statements by Person A are Person A's opinion. Person B asserts that the statements justify something--something that he/she does not think is/was justified.
To me, all of this begs a question: Can a person's opinion justify anything?
Maybe it is just me, but it makes no sense to me to say that somebody's opinon justifies anything. It's just his/her opinion! Since when did anybody have the authority, power or ability to justify anything by stating his/her opinion?