I'd like to see a movie clip.
FYI, the dark images are not camels.
That's nearly as bad as AV and his thread necromancy. That image is 16-17 years old!
FYI, the dark images are not camels.
I realized that after I posted it. But I still love the image.That's nearly as bad as AV and his thread necromancy. That image is 16-17 years old!
Thats beautiful!This is the best that I can do:
I might want to make that investment soon. It is not all that expensive. But how long has that been a thing? The photo that I posted is from 2,005. That might be pre-drone. It was of course not pre-airplane.The sheer pleasure of drone photography. I bought one a year ago - shared the cost with son and son-in-law. The different perspective it gives you on the world is astonishing. Plus it is a bucket of fun to fly.
Please don't tell me this is what Antarctica is going to be like in ten years if we don't switch to LED light bulbs and start bicycling to work!FYI, the dark images are not camels.
I might want to make that investment soon. It is not all that expensive. But how long has that been a thing? The photo that I posted is from 2,005. That might be pre-drone. It was of course not pre-airplane.
Those rules came about because a small minority abused their drones and used it to spy on others, at least there were plenty of stories in the US.The FAA issued the first permit in 2006. And then issued 2 or 3 a year for the next few years. So 2005? I guess it's unlikely to be a drone from back then - maybe the guy had a chopper flight. I bought a Mavic Air 2 which is just entering pro territory. Just over $2k which included 3 batteries so you can get close to 90 minutes fly time. Astonishing what it can do. The range is an incredible 18kms - although flying it out of sight is not allowed if you want to follow the rules. And that's the only fly in the ointment - you are restricted as to where you can fly.
He used a paragliderI might want to make that investment soon. It is not all that expensive. But how long has that been a thing? The photo that I posted is from 2,005. That might be pre-drone. It was of course not pre-airplane.
Thanks, unfortunately I have used up my monthly free visits to he New York Times.
They are amazingly camel-like.FYI, the dark images are not camels.
Frankly this picture looks photoshopped.FYI, the dark images are not camels.
For one thing, it looks like you can superimpose most of them over each other.Why and how?
That is because the dark parts are not camels. Blow it up and look at it more closely.For one thing, it looks like you can superimpose most of them over each other.
For another, they all look like their standing on fish, or puddles of water, or something.
There's even a "fish" superimposed over one of the camels -- (the one at the bottom, fifth one in from the left).
Looks photoshopped to me.