Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
"The sinful mind (of the unregenerate man) is hostile to God.First, your points you made does not undo the verses I posted on our free will in choosing God. They show that the burden of responsibilty is on every man to accept God in this life (regardless of their sinful inclinations). Man is not totally depraved whereby he cannot respond to God without a regeneration. Total Depravity is a lie of Calvinism.
"for it is God who works in you to will and to act according to his good purpose."Second, while Philippians 2:13 is true, but we also have free will to still walk away.
Indeed we do. . .and God has insured that we will always freely decide to continue with him, by working in the born again a preference, desire, like for the things of the Spirit, insuring that we continue "to will and to act according to his good purpose." (Philippians 2:3)We also have free will to decide if we want to CONTINUE with God or not over choosing a life of sin (without God) again.
We are told:
“...We are made partakers of Christ, if we hold the beginning of our confidence stedfast unto the end.” (Hebrews 3:13-14).We are told to
"Keep yourselves in the love of God, looking for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ unto eternal life." (Jude 1:21).
"...be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life." (Revelation 2:10).
1.Continue in the grace of God (Acts of the Apostles 13:43).
2.Continue in the faith (Acts of the Apostles 14:22) (Colossians 1:23).
3.Continue in his goodness, otherwise we can be cut off (just like the Jews were cut off) (Romans 11:21-22).
So when did our willing and our acting (Philippians 2:13) become doing nothing?The picture you paint sounds like we have to do nothing and wait on God to do it all.
Correct. . ."Calvinsim" teaches the Bible.If He does not do anything through us, we are not Elected or chosen and one of the unlucky ones. We are like the poor dog who was sick and had an uncontrollable pooping problem whereby the master just wants to kick us like a football because that his desire. But I don't believe in the God of Calvinism. I believe in the God of the Bible and it does not teach Calvinism (Which paints a cruel and heartless version of God). But you are free to believe as you wish (of course).
I mean, what do you do with verses like these?
“Fight the good fight of faith, lay hold on eternal life,...” (1 Timothy 6:12).Do you run and hide from such verses or do you seek to change them to fit your belief?
Where do you find Calvin stating that?For me, I just read it and believe it. There is no need for me to change this above verse to fit a pre-conceived belief that I want to be true. But I cannot in all good honestly see how the Calvinist accepts this above verse plainly in what it says. They believe they are elected to salvation and they do not have to do anything to be saved or have eternal life.
Precisely! . .and he finishes that same sentence withBut 1 Timothy 6:12 says FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT OF FAITH AND LAY HOLD ON ETERNAL LIFE. I believe my Bible and not men. But you are free to believe as you wish. Yes, God can work through us (Philippians 2:13). But this in harmony with Philippians 2:12 that says to work out your salvation with fear and trembling.
I refrained from answering that one this time around, because I have done so before to no avail. You didn't listen then. Reformers do NOT disagree concerning the context in and around Romans 9 (though obviously they may disagree as to the worldview you bring to bear on it). Context is very important, of course. But the subject matter leads to (and does not counter) what those few verses teach, as a side issue: Not only is GOD the one who to use for what purposes, and not only can nobody resist his will, but who are you, oh man, to question God?, etc etc. —these principles remain true in all matters —not just the Jew-Gentile matter.She was not able to explain away my rebuttal of her false Calvnistic way of thinking on Romans 9.
Also, nobody has also been able to provide a satisfactory answer to the moral problem in UNconditional Election whereby God elects (chooses to save) a person beyond their own free will and yet God allows the vast majority of mankind to perish (When He could just Elect them ALL to be forced saved against their will). This is something Calvinists are unwilling to answer and thus they try to escape explaining it and or they try to paint a different nicer picture (that seems contrary to what they believe).
I don't know where you come up with Calvin as the measure of the Bible.There really is no point in me rehashing these points with Scripture with you again. You are not reading Romans 9 in context to the chapter and the book of Romans.
Only part of Romans 9 sounds Calvinistic.
Or perhaps you are not understanding correctly what you think is not in harmony with Romans 9;It is the only part of the Bible that does sound like that if read out of context with a surface shallow reading. But the rest of the Bible is not written in that way.
Since Calvin is the theologian of grace, I think it's fair to say you do not understand him.We should trust the whole counsel of God's Word and not just believe what we prefer to see. I believe Calvinism paints a picture of God that is cold hearted and forces many people to a fate of not being saved and their sole purpose in life is to be tortured for all eternity (Without them having any power to change that fate).
Your objection is to your own (mis)understanding of Calvin.want to believe in God to be this way, and they have free will to believe this way wrongfully of God. But such a view of God is not biblical. I know it does not matter what verses I present and what points I make. Many want the Calvinistic God to be true for their own personal reasons or because it fits their own mindset in how they view the world.
The best way for me to show you the misunderstanding of your premise (i.e., God's actions must satisfy my fallen human nature's understanding in order to be good and just) is to direct you to Paul's answer (Romans 9:20-21) to that very kind of question (Romans 9:19).But we are to worship the One true God who is the maker of the Heavens and the Earth and who is good and does things with a fair and just hand. Anyways, can you demonstrate to me how Unconditional Election and the forced damnation of the wicked (against their free will) is good by using a real world example? I don't see how.
Remember, it is your own (mis)understanding of Calvin to which you object.Calvinism cannot be true because of 2 Thessalonians 2:10.
That is the only verse you need to refute Calvinism but there are loads more if a person really wants to research the verses online. Also, there is the moral problem of God in Calvinism, as well. This to me is one of the biggest giveaways that Calvinism is not true in the slightest sense.
So Paul's argument in the following verses defending God's sovereign right to dispense mercy as he pleases, based simply on his choice to do so and nothing else, using God's election of Jacob to demonstrate his argument, just simply does not exist? To wit:There really is no point in me rehashing these points with Scripture with you again. You are not reading Romans 9 in context to the chapter and the book of Romans. Only part of Romans 9 sounds Calvinistic. It is the only part of the Bible that does sound like that if read out of context with a surface shallow reading. But the rest of the Bible is not written in that way. We should trust the whole counsel of God's Word and not just believe what we prefer to see.
It is, beginning with the very name of God being his sovereignty:But the rest of the Bible is not written in that way. We should trust the whole counsel of God's Word and not just believe what we prefer to see.
The elect will be saved infallibly through the preaching of the gospel, for God determined that it would be so through the eternal covenant of redemption established among the persons of the Trinity. In his sovereign, gracious, distinguishing love, the Father has chosen certain people (Rom. 9:11-13; Eph. 1:4) whom he gave to his Son (John 6:37, 39; 17:6, 24), who, in turn, committed himself to accomplish their redemption by obeying the precepts of God’s moral law perfectly on their behalf (his active obedience) and paying the penalty due them for their disobedience to the law (his passive obedience). Thus God can be just and the justifier of those who believe in Jesus (Rom. 3:26). Under the Trinitarian covenant, the Spirit is sent into the world by the Father and the Son (John 15:26; 16:5-15) to apply Christ’s saving work to the elect...
Knowing that the elect will be gathered by the second Adam (John 17:12; Rom. 5:12-19) makes Calvinists bold in evangelism. They also are patient in it, knowing that God will save sinners in his time and way through the priestly work of Christ (Isa. 55:10-11). They are zealous, knowing that God’s glory will come to be (1 Cor. 1:27-31), and prayerful, knowing that he alone will and can accomplish salvation as an ever-faithful, covenant-keeping Lord (Eph. 2:1-10).10 Nearly all the great and zealous evangelists of the church from the sixteenth-century Reformation to the early nineteenth century, before Charles Finney (1792-1875), were committed to definite atonement rooted in this God-centred covenant theology. Would anyone dare say that George Whitefield lacked evangelistic zeal in preaching the gospel? Would anyone say the same of Charles Spurgeon, William Carey, David Brainerd, Jonathan Edwards, or Asahel Nettleton? Each of these great evangelists professed a definite design in the atoning work of Christ and boldly heralded Christ as a freely offered and willing Saviour to all who repent and believe.11
Third, while we cannot fully grasp with our finite minds how to reconcile a definite, limited atonement with Christ’s all-sufficient blood and a universal invitation to believe, such is the pattern of Scripture and the way of God (John 6:37-40). Moreover, since the atonement is not limited in itself, though it is in its design, and since the promise is that all who by faith truly come to Christ for salvation will certainly be saved (Rom. 10:13), limited atonement is not inconsistent with a universal call to faith.
https://banneroftruth.org/us/resources/articles/2009/defending-definite-atonement/
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?