Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It really comes down to God's sovereignty and just how much control one believes God has.
Calvinists obviously believe God has every once of the control in every single part of creation and our lives. Arminianism on the other hand limits God's involvement and places more focus on mans involvement and freewill.
Hence the argument hence the debate and they are big things to disagree on on a theology level but I don't think it should determine fellowship or friendship of any kind. It shouldn't be a division factor and unfortunately it has been.
God wrote on his heart to follow at the exact time He wanted to.... just like Paul.Is it really possible that you are beating a dead horse? At first Jonah, not Johan, didn't want to do what God told him. Jonah ran from God, but God knew just how to convince Jonah. In the end, Jonah did what God wanted him to do. I am not contradicting myself. Any contradiction is in your mind. I doubt seriously that I will convince you. Your mind seems to be solidly made up. Ok, we will leave it that way.
It really comes down to God's sovereignty and just how much control one believes God has.
Calvinists obviously believe God has every once of the control in every single part of creation and our lives. Arminianism on the other hand limits God's involvement and places more focus on mans involvement and freewill.
Hence the argument hence the debate and they are big things to disagree on on a theology level but I don't think it should determine fellowship or friendship of any kind. It shouldn't be a division factor and unfortunately it has been.
thank you for saying that calvinism is wrong, God gave Johan an offer he couldn't refuse. that is a choice, thank you! Did that person continue to refuse God, that is a choice, did God continue to work with that person That is applied mercy. are you telling me that you don't know anyone even in your family that has refused God and you don't know if God will ever get through to them , does the Bible ever say that King Agrippa answered the drawing of the Holy Ghost?
Acts 26:28-29
28 Then Agrippa said unto Paul, Almost thou persuadest me to be a Christian.
29 And Paul said, I would to God, that not only thou, but also all that hear me this day, were both almost, and altogether such as I am, except these bonds. KJV
it is called by calvinist the doctrine of Grace, seeing that we are saved by grace, then this is a salvational doctrine, there is not two gospels, either you preach god forces himself on you, or you preach God allows you to call on Him, Jesus said to go preach the gospel, if you go into a home and preach the gospel , and that home won't have anything to do with it, then the disciples were to shake the dust off their shoes and leave, this is a split issue if there was ever one.
Mark 6:7-12
7 And he called unto him the twelve, and began to send them forth by two and two; and gave them power over unclean spirits;
8 And commanded them that they should take nothing for their journey, save a staff only; no scrip, no bread, no money in their purse:
9 But be shod with sandals; and not put on two coats.
10 And he said unto them, In what place soever ye enter into an house, there abide till ye depart from that place.
11 And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear you, when ye depart thence, shake off the dust under your feet for a testimony against them. Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Sodom and Gomorrha in the day of judgment, than for that city.
12 And they went out, and preached that men should repent.
KJV
shall not receive you, Sounds like choice to me.
I have already shown how God is not a respector of persons. Are you able to explain how 0% of a person and 100% of God can be partiality? Continuing to make a claim that has shown to be false is bad form.but see we can't just pick and choose the verses we want to accept and throw the rest out, we must live by every Word! Romans teaches us that because Of adam, God caused "ALL" men to be borned with a sin nature. so unless He allows or offers "ALL" a relief from the wages of sin, there is two things that happens 1st He is respect of persons 2nd, He caused us to sin, some without relief , so what is His judgement ?
First, I have already stated... I am not a Calvinist. Which is why I describe this topic as election by grace.what really blows me away about Calvinist. if God wanted to offer salvation to those that want it , calvinist tells a sovereign God that he can't do it that way, then judges us who says that God allowed me to accept or refuse His love, of telling God what He can do or not do! well if you really believe that God is Sovereign then quit telling Him that He can only saved calvinist, let Him have mercy on whom He will have mercy! and second this is very Bibical, quit preaching/feeding babes in Christ deep/meat Things that you all can't even agree on, 5 point no I am only 4 points , well I am only three points, but lets "ALL" push this doctrine down the mouths of babes
It really comes down to God's sovereignty and just how much control one believes God has.
Calvinists obviously believe God has every once of the control in every single part of creation and our lives. Arminianism on the other hand limits God's involvement and places more focus on mans involvement and freewill.
Hence the argument hence the debate and they are big things to disagree on on a theology level but I don't think it should determine fellowship or friendship of any kind. It shouldn't be a division factor and unfortunately it has been.
it is called by calvinist the doctrine of Grace, seeing that we are saved by grace, then this is a salvational doctrine, there is not two gospels, either you preach god forces himself on you, or you preach God allows you to call on Him, Jesus said to go preach the gospel, if you go into a home and preach the gospel , and that home won't have anything to do with it, then the disciples were to shake the dust off their shoes and leave, this is a split issue if there was ever one.
Mark 6:7-12
7 And he called unto him the twelve, and began to send them forth by two and two; and gave them power over unclean spirits;
8 And commanded them that they should take nothing for their journey, save a staff only; no scrip, no bread, no money in their purse:
9 But be shod with sandals; and not put on two coats.
10 And he said unto them, In what place soever ye enter into an house, there abide till ye depart from that place.
11 And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear you, when ye depart thence, shake off the dust under your feet for a testimony against them. Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Sodom and Gomorrha in the day of judgment, than for that city.
12 And they went out, and preached that men should repent.
KJV
shall not receive you, Sounds like choice to me.
God wrote on his heart to follow at the exact time He wanted to.... just like Paul.
------
The teaching is idolatry of the self. A light that is separate from God. A light that we are supposed to live our lives in and by (Gal 2:20).
Holding the view can be in error and does not reflect one's heart. Still saved by grace.
Or the view accurately reflects the heart and just like like Matt 7:21-23 who pointed to their own works, are not followers of Christ.
It is a big issue.
-----
A choice is always based upon the heart.... because that is in fact what one desires/believes/thinks/etc...
The fruit (choice) reflects the heart (tree) (Luke 6:43).
At the time Jonah refused... God did not write it on his heart.
When he did comply... God wrote it on his heart.
Election by grace upholds choice.... it just explains how the heart chose. Flesh begets flesh and Spirit begets spirit (John 3:6). A fleshly heart will always choose flesh... and be in opposition to God (Gal 5:17 Rom 7 and 8). A heart touched by the Spirit will always choose that of the Spirit.
Not explaining it like this is in opposition to scripture. Otherwise a thornbush could produce an orange (Luke 6:44).
A choice based upon their heart.
The way you are describing God forcing Himself on someone can also be applied to His creating us. God forced Himself on me, because He created me the way He wanted. Is that rape? Is God not creating you the way you desire rape? From what you are claiming... yes.
Which means you have an issue with God and creation... including creating light to shine in dark hearts (2 Cor 4:6).
I have already shown how God is not a respector of persons. Are you able to explain how 0% of a person and 100% of God can be partiality? Continuing to make a claim that has shown to be false is bad form.
All men sin in Adam, not God.
"For as through the one man's disobedience the many were made sinners, even so through the obedience of the One the many will be made righteous." Rom 5:19
Creation was subjected to futility and corruption by God (Rom 8:21,21) through God's curse (gen 3) which also promised hope.
So His judgment is perfect. All start in the pit, God through His mercy, based upon Himself, saves some out of the pit for His glory.
We reflect that glory and praise His name! As elect, based upon Himself, He loves us and has always loved us... even when we were still sinners (Rom 5:8). Not because of anything we have done, but because of what He has done.
First, I have already stated... I am not a Calvinist. Which is why I describe this topic as election by grace.
God offering salvation to those He wants to... is consistent with God having mercy upon whom He wants to have mercy. I am not seeing your point.
Now about not picking and choosing verses. You still have two topics you are ignoring:
-Being saved is by grace. (Eph 2:8,9)
-Mercy does not depend upon man's actions or will, but God alone. (Rom 9:11,12,16)
that is your assumption not my and remember please what we do when we assume something, the Holy Ghost draws, then man uses His God given Ability to choose good over evil, "seek ye the kingdom of God and His righteousness" God don't just pick you up , and sit you into His kingdom, But tells you to seek it! that sounds like to me you have a very important part in finding the kingdom of GodAnd based on the next staement:
One must conclude that Arminianism takes the work of the Holy Spirit out of the equasion.
I came to God of my own "free-will".
(KJV)
God Bless
Till all are one.
His_disciple3 said:that is your assumption not my and remember please what we do when we assume something, the Holy Ghost draws, then man uses His God given Ability to choose good over evil, "seek ye the kingdom of God and His righteousness" God don't just pick you up , and sit you into His kingdom, But tells you to seek it! that sounds like to me you have a very important part in finding the kingdom of God
that is your assumption not my and remember please what we do when we assume something, the Holy Ghost draws, then man uses His God given Ability to choose good over evil, "seek ye the kingdom of God and His righteousness" God don't just pick you up , and sit you into His kingdom, But tells you to seek it! that sounds like to me you have a very important part in finding the kingdom of God
Heaven is to be sought for in the first place, as the perfection of the saints' happiness; and Christ's righteousness is to be sought for, and laid hold on by faith, as the way and means of enjoying that happiness; without which, there will be no entering into the kingdom of heaven.
as far as Eph 2:8,9 when we take parts of verse and try to make them say something by theirselves that is how false doctrine are started, for By grace are we saved, THROUGH FAITH, again I say If God forces you to believe in Him , that is not Faith.
if God forces you to serve Him that is not obedience.
as far as romans 9, I have always said that yes the Bible teaches predestination and yes the Bible teaches free-will,
so you are confirming that your understanding of scriptures Make your god a great big type of rapist who forces people to love Him and there can be no resisitance? and even forces them to serve him, and this is your understanding Of a god of mercy. who forces people to be born in a sin nature and them judges them cause they sinned?
it is called by calvinist the doctrine of Grace, seeing that we are saved by grace, then this is a salvational doctrine, there is not two gospels, either you preach god forces himself on you, or you preach God allows you to call on Him, Jesus said to go preach the gospel, if you go into a home and preach the gospel , and that home won't have anything to do with it, then the disciples were to shake the dust off their shoes and leave, this is a split issue if there was ever one.
1) either you preach god forces himself on you, or you preach God allows you to call on Him,
Mark 6:7-12
7 And he called unto him the twelve, and began to send them forth by two and two; and gave them power over unclean spirits;
8 And commanded them that they should take nothing for their journey, save a staff only; no scrip, no bread, no money in their purse:
9 But be shod with sandals; and not put on two coats.
10 And he said unto them, In what place soever ye enter into an house, there abide till ye depart from that place.
11 And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear you, when ye depart thence, shake off the dust under your feet for a testimony against them. Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Sodom and Gomorrha in the day of judgment, than for that city.
12 And they went out, and preached that men should repent.
KJV
shall not receive you, Sounds like choice to me.
well your misunderstanding of calvinism is that God forced Jonah to do what God wanted Him to do, Not convinced, saying convinced is still leaving the decision up to man/Jonah, and this doctrine will just not wash with calvinism, so you ought to know more about the doctrine that you are willing to stand up for before you stand up for it. go ahead start a poll and ask calvinist if their god convinces or forces/make people do things.
I don't think you understand Calvinism very well, you made a lot of erroneous statements in this post.
When a lifeguard rescues a drowning man who is unconscious under the water, he did not force himself on the man - he rescued him. Salvation is being rescued by God. He removes our blindfold and changes our heart. It's called regeneration or being born again. Why you refuse to use these Biblical words, instead choosing to use the phrase "forces himself on you", I don't know. But it makes me sad that you don't see God as your rescuer. Instead, it seems you only see him as a deal maker. You see God sitting across the table, making an offer to you, and nothing more. Calvinists see God as their rescuer. They are convinced that if God had not effectually and irresistibly saved them, they would end up in hell. So we owe everything to God.
The thing is, nobody would call upon God until God first moves. So it is not "either/or" as you have mistakenly set up. both are true: God effectually saves us, and also, God commands us to repent and believe. But the bible is clear that it is God who grants repentance. He is in charge of changing hearts and removing the spiritual blindfold. We are not in charge of changing our own hearts and removing our own spiritual blindfold. As another posted noted, Arminianism removes the Work of the Holy Spirit from conversion. To an Arminian, conversion is simply an act of the human brain making some sort of intellectual decision, as if salvation was as if choosing Jesus is as simple as choosing whether or not to have dessert.
Yes, all humans make a choice and have the power of choice. Calvinsits do not deny that some humans choose to accept Christ and others choose to reject him.
What you don't understand is that the Bible is clear about WHY those people choose Christ and why those other people reject Christ.
The first group of people received unearned, free mercy on God's part. The other group, God left in their sins, giving them what they desire (rebellion). God is completely justified in doing so.
if that lifeguard saves someone who was trying to drown themselves. then He forced himself on them.
also it is you my friend that don't understand calvinism to well, take a poll and see how many calvinist agree that one can accept Christ or refuse Christ!
now now!! where did I ever say I was pentacostal, Predestination without foreknowledge is disagreeing with fundemental truth of scriptures. maybe if the pentatcostal happen to agree with scriptures concerning the Holy Ghost, perhaps they understood the Bible and agrees with scriptures as well.Can you point to one of my posts where I said that I am a Calvinist? I am a Christian who reads the Scriptures and believes them. If Calvin's writings happen to agree with the Bible, perhaps he understood the Bible and agrees with Scripture as well. If you don't agree with predestination, you disagree with a fundemental truth of Scriptures.
You can go to your church and we can go to ours. I promise that we won't picket in front of your church if you return the favor.
You say you are a Pentacostal. You won't find any converts on this forum.
now now!! where did I ever say I was pentacostal, Predestination without foreknowledge is disagreeing with fundemental truth of scriptures. maybe if the pentatcostal happen to agree with scriptures concerning the Holy Ghost, perhaps they understood the Bible and agrees with scriptures as well.
I never said predestination wasn't scriptural< if you have been keeping up. I say. Yes predestination is in scriptures and yes free-will is also, to deny either is disagreeing with fundemental truths of scriptures
phoenixdem said:From your profile, "found out that I was more Pentecostal than Baptist. Got Spirit Baptized in 2008, by the Holy Spirit through Tommy Zito been Praying in tongues ever since, My wife claims that some nights I pray in tongues all night." You doth protest too much.
I don't believe in speaking in tongues from God in this day. They have ceased and were never the babbling heard in pentacostal churches anyway. Biblical tongues were understood because they are languages that people speak and were used to launch the church in the world evangelistically. When people do it today in the pentacostal manner I believe its a very bad indicator of a very bad situation generated by either the individual or an evil spirit.
Yes, all humans make a choice and have the power of choice. Calvinsits do not deny that some humans choose to accept Christ and others choose to reject him.
What you don't understand is that the Bible is clear about WHY those people choose Christ and why those other people reject Christ.
The first group of people received unearned, free mercy on God's part. The other group, God left in their sins, giving them what they desire (rebellion). God is completely justified in doing so.
What is the Will? We answer, the will is the faculty of choice, the immediate cause of all action. Choice necessarily implies the refusal of one thing and the acceptance of another. The positive and the negative must both be present to the mind before there can be any choice. In every act of the will there is a preferencethe desiring of one thing rather than another. Where there is no preference, but complete indifference, there is no volition. To will is to choose, and to choose is to decide between two or more alternatives. But there is something which influences the choice; something which determines the decision. Hence the will cannot be sovereign because it is the servant of that something. The will cannot be both sovereign and servant. It cannot be both cause and effect. The will is not causative, because, as we have said, something causes it to choose, therefore that something must be the causative agent. Choice itself is affected by certain considerations, is determined by various influences brought to bear upon the individual himself, hence, volition is the effect of these considerations and influences, and if the effect, it must be their servant; and if the will is their servant then it is not sovereign, and if the will is not sovereign, we certainly cannot predicate absolute "freedom" of it. Acts of the will cannot come to pass of themselvesto say they can, is to postulate an uncaused effect. Ex nihilo nihil fitnothing cannot produce something.
That which determines the will is that which causes it to choose. If the will is determined, then there must be a determiner. What is it that determines the will? We reply, The strongest motive power which is brought to bear upon it. What this motive power is, varies in different cases.
It is only as we see the real nature of freedom and mark that the will is subject to the motives brought to bear upon it, that we are able to discern there is no conflict between two statements of Holy Writ which concern our blessed Lord. In Matthew 4:1 we read, "Then was Jesus led up of the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted of the Devil;" but in Mark 1:12, 13 we are told, "And immediately the Spirit driveth Him into the wilderness. And He was there in the wilderness forty days, tempted of Satan". It is utterly impossible to harmonize these two statements by the Arminian conception of the will. But really there is no difficulty. That Christ was "driven", implies it was by a forcible motive or powerful impulse, such as was not to be resisted or refused; that He was "led" denotes His freedom in going. Putting the two together we learn, that He was driven, with a voluntary condescension thereto. So, there is the liberty of mans will and the victorious efficacy of Gods grace united together: a sinner may be "drawn" and yet "come" to Christthe "drawing" presenting to him the irresistible motive, the "coming" signifying the response of his willas Christ was "driven" and "led" by the Spirit into the wilderness.
Human philosophy insists that it is the will which governs the man, but the Word of God teaches that it is the heart which is the dominating center of our being. Many scriptures might be quoted in substantiation of this. "Keep thy heart with all diligence; for out of it are the issues of life" (Prov. 4:23). "For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders," etc. (Mark 7:21).Here our Lord traces these sinful acts back to their source, and declares that their fountain is the "heart," and not the will! Again; "This people draweth nigh unto Me with their lips, but their heart is far from Me" (Matt. 15:8). If further proof were required we might call attention to the fact that the word "heart" is found in the Bible more than three times oftener than is the word "will," even though nearly half of the references to the latter refer to Gods will!
In what does the sinners freedom consist? This question is naturally suggested by what we have just said above. The sinner is free in the sense of being unforced from without. God never forces the sinner to sin. But the sinner is not free to do either good or evil, because an evil heart within is ever inclining him toward sin. Let us illustrate what we have in mind. I hold in my hand a book. I release it; what happens? It falls. In which direction? Downwards; always downwards. Why? Because, answering the law of gravity, its own weight sinks it. Suppose I desire that book to occupy a position three feet higher; then what? I must lift it; a power outside of that book must raise it. Such is the relationship which fallen man sustains toward God. Whilst Divine power upholds him, he is preserved from plunging still deeper into sin; let that power be withdrawn, and he fallshis own weight (of sin) drags him down. God does not push him down, anymore than I did that book. Let all Divine restraint be removed, and every man is capable of becoming, would become, a Cain, a Pharaoh, a Judas. How then is the sinner to move heavenwards? By an act of his own will? Not so. A power outside of himself must grasp hold of him and lift him every inch of the way. The sinner is free, but free in one direction onlyfree to fall, free to sin. As the Word expresses it: "For when ye were the servants of sin, ye were free from righteousness" (Rom. 6:20). The sinner is free to do as he pleases, always as he pleases (except as he is restrained by God), but his pleasure is to sin.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?