Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Not to me. Could you please clarify in clear terms what your position on abortion is? It would allow others to have a meaningful discussion with you without having to make assumptions.
Most everyone's grandparents or g-grandparents were immigrants.
Pro-life? people have scores of excuses to not actually help those in need.
I guess they both are about imaging a better life for everyone.
But it's not as if Pro-Life groups orchestrate adoptions.
"Too much work" I guess.
If a child is fifteen minutes away from birth...and the abortionist holds part of his body inside the mother long enough for him to tear it apart with surgical instruments...No one is sacrificing anyone to Moloch. Moreover foetuses are not children.
Your stance is as clear as mud. I have no idea of what you believe or what...
No one is sacrificing anyone to Moloch. Moreover foetuses are not children.
Do you know how rare late-term abortions are? They are always medically-mandated and are performed on non-viable foetuses and no, it is not murder.If a child is fifteen minutes away from birth...and the abortionist holds part of his body inside the mother long enough for him to tear it apart with surgical instruments...
It IS Murder!
Yet not even prohibiting this monstrous act is acceptable to the liberals in the USA (which is why it is still legal).
Can you prove they are? You lot made the claim, now back it up with proof.On what do you base this? Do you have a Biblical, moral or scientific foundation for this claim?
Frequency does not determine whether or not the act is murder. There are relatively few murders committed in this country using chain saws, too, but when they do happen, they are not considered to be something other than murder.Do you know how rare late-term abortions are?
Can you prove they are? You lot made the claim, now back it up with proof.
Do you know how rare late-term abortions are? They are always medically-mandated and are performed on non-viable foetuses and no, it is not murder.
My question was directed at SkyWriting. Sorry for the confusion.
A quick review of the laws indicate this to be a state by state matter and it does not necessarily agree with your claims.
Can you prove they are? You lot made the claim, now back it up with proof.
Children refers to a babe ex utero, while it is in utero it is a foetus .This is a complete dodge of the question. I am happy to share my views, but you made a declarative statement that fetus’ are not children. I simply asked what you base that on. Since you stated it as factual, surely you have some proof, or at least some evidence that you believe amounts to proof for your statement, right?
Give me an example where a late term abortion could EVER be medically necessary. If the mother's life is in danger related to something like pre-eclampsia, then they induce birth or perform a c-section. Whether or not the baby lives depends on God and its gestation age. I can't think of any circumstance where a scheduled late term abortion would be better for the mother than an induced labor or a c-section. I take care of these mother as a primary role of my patient care lately. Every single one of my NICU patients over the last 2 years related to early birth to save a mother's life has lived to to be discharged. This includes little 26 week preemies. The process the mother goes through in a late-term abortion is exactly the same as giving birth to a live baby...and so is the recovery. And if a baby is accidentally born alive in a botched abortion, they call it fetal tissue and just let it die. I have issues with this because if a baby breathes even one breath, they are normally consider "alive" and need both a birth and death certificate.
Give me an example where a late term abortion could EVER be medically necessary. If the mother's life is in danger related to something like pre-eclampsia, then they induce birth or perform a c-section. Whether or not the baby lives depends on God and its gestation age. I can't think of any circumstance where a scheduled late term abortion would be better for the mother than an induced labor or a c-section. I take care of these mother as a primary role of my patient care lately. Every single one of my NICU patients over the last 2 years related to early birth to save a mother's life has lived to to be discharged. This includes little 26 week preemies. The process the mother goes through in a late-term abortion is exactly the same as giving birth to a live baby...and so is the recovery. And if a baby is accidentally born alive in a botched abortion, they call it fetal tissue and just let it die. I have issues with this because if a baby breathes even one breath, they are normally consider "alive" and need both a birth and death certificate.
Foetuses dead in the womb and foetuses suffering a number of mutations making them non-viable outside the womb.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?