- Jan 10, 2010
- 37,281
- 8,501
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
Worthy of adopting or financially supporting the baby for life.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What is a fetus if it isn't a human in baby form? Genetically it is the same as after it is born. It is just in a different developmental stage. It isn't the mother. It is a unique living being
Worthy of adopting or financially supporting the baby for life.
I looked at Pro-Life groups online and found very few connections. Saving babies lives just is not that important. I used to attend
Pro-Life rallies and events. Shaming and accusing is the focus.
I looked at Pro-Life groups online and found very few connections.
Saving babies lives just is not that important. I used to attend
Pro-Life rallies and events. Shaming and accusing is the focus.
Ahh..blame. Another prolife tool to avoid helping those in need.In a place where a woman can legally murder her child without preclusion of external sources, shaming the woman's conscience by accusing her of her crime is a highly practical route. I am subscribed to and have watched many of the videos by Pastor Jeff Durbin (as shown previously in this thread) and many women who he ministers to simply decline the option of adoption. They either don't want to wait or simply don't care. Why? They are shameless.
I may be wrong but here is my opinion, I think you might have had some bad experiences with a pro-life group in the past, and because of that, it's clouded your perception of the whole movement in the present. Saving babies should be important to all Christians, regardless of politics, with Churches helping single mothers and low income families trying to raise kids should be equally important, but I can only speak in ideals knowing things often do not work out ideally or even close.
Shaming and accusing just seems to be a common theme in politics from all ends and sides of the spectrum, just look at the situations today, not much has changed.
Ahh..blame. Another prolife tool to avoid helping those in need.
Blame people for their poor decisions and let them murder their
babies becasue caring for women and their situations is hard work.
Shame and blame will save lives? Or is it just more fun.
In a place where a woman can legally murder her child without preclusion of external sources, shaming the woman's conscience by accusing her of her crime is a highly practical route.
My stand is consistent on this topic. Feel free to report any of my posts, anytime.At this point it seems like your trolling.
It is the weakest and least financial commitment route.
So yes, very practical.
It is the weakest and least financial commitment route. So yes, very practical.
My stand is consistent on this topic. Feel free to report any of my posts, anytime.
Makes room for illegal immigrant mouths to feed I suppose.
OK. Sorry I didn't ignore your post. I'll work on that.Don't be so sensitive. Just because I am astonished at your odd simplistic view doesn't mean I intend to report you. I consider that immature practice regardless in 99% of cases.
Most everyone's grandparents or g-grandparents were immigrants.
Then all Pro-Life advocates and groups would
focus on adoption. But that's inconvenient.
Endless excuses to not actually get involved
(financially) in the lives of others.
The solution is to focus on the evil of the women
making the lethal choices.
While I agree with your sentiment, that aborting children to 'make your life better' is no different from child-sacrifice for gaining the favour of the gods, there is some debate here.
Many child sacrifices in Carthage and Syria-Palestine have been discovered, associated with ancient text referencing it, and using forms of MLK. Whether this should be interpreted as a god Molech is doubtful. It is possible this merely refers to the trinominal root for King (melek) so could refer to any god. It may refer to Melqart of Tyre, too. It is also possible this is a technical name for child sacrifice itself, which is what its use in Carthage for sacrifices to Tanit and Melqart suggest.
So Biblical references mean that perhaps the Hebrews were sacrificing their children to YHWH! Which is why it was even more abhorrent to the prophets.
I have heard this argument from the pro-choice side for years now. “If you don’t adopt, you can’t say abortion is wrong”. It sounds good at first, until you realize that the proposed alternative is to snuff out a baby’s life for the sake of convenience.
My stand is consistent on this topic.
Worthy of adopting or financially supporting the baby for life.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?