• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Is it ever acceptable to execute heretics?


  • Total voters
    46
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

zippy2006

Dragonsworn
Nov 9, 2013
7,640
3,846
✟299,838.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0

JackRT

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2015
15,722
16,445
82
small town Ontario, Canada
✟767,445.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married
There is not a Christian alive today who is not a heretic to some other Christian alive today. So to paraphrase a bishop from long ago "burn them all and let God sort them out".
 
Reactions: Aryeh Jay
Upvote 0

durangodawood

re Member
Aug 28, 2007
27,510
19,192
Colorado
✟537,089.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0

zippy2006

Dragonsworn
Nov 9, 2013
7,640
3,846
✟299,838.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
There is not a Christian alive today who is not a heretic to some other Christian alive today.

That's not true and it is one of the many confusions in this thread. They idea of heresy is analogous to treason (ergo, my post here). Therefore to say what you've said is very similar to saying, "There is no one alive today who is not a traitor to some other nation." Both of these statements make no sense, and for the same reason.

"Heretic" has come to mean, "Someone who holds to a false religious proposition," in the common parlance, but the stricter and more accurate meaning is, "Someone who formally and obstinately holds to a religious proposition that their own religious body has condemned." This is why, for example, it is historically impossible for the unbaptized to be heretics.
 
Upvote 0

zippy2006

Dragonsworn
Nov 9, 2013
7,640
3,846
✟299,838.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single

The OP presumably means it in the sense, "It is unconditionally unacceptable to execute heretics" (at any time in the past, present, or future).
 
Reactions: public hermit
Upvote 0

durangodawood

re Member
Aug 28, 2007
27,510
19,192
Colorado
✟537,089.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
The OP presumably means it in the sense, "It is unconditionally unacceptable to execute heretics" (at any time in the past, present, or future).
(poll option) It is never acceptable to execute heretics
Whoops. I quote the wrong person previously. That was dumb.

So regarding the past. Isnt that a matter of history rather than about personal moral opinion?

I mean, I'm presuming that burning was acceptable to many, based on state/church sanction. And no ones present day personal morality can change that.
 
Upvote 0

durangodawood

re Member
Aug 28, 2007
27,510
19,192
Colorado
✟537,089.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Which was self serving.
Really? I thought the motive was to protect people from false doctrines, as their very souls are at stake?

Or was dogmatic certainty just a ruse to keep the church flush with power and money?
 
Upvote 0

public hermit

social troglodyte
Site Supporter
Aug 20, 2019
12,463
13,284
East Coast
✟1,043,990.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
So regarding the past. Isnt that a matter of history rather than about personal moral opinion?

I mean, I'm presuming that burning was acceptable to many, based on state/church sanction. And no ones present day personal morality can change that.

Your question pertains to an arguable point. I tried to frame the options in such a way as to allow for both an absolute moral imperative as well as a relative moral claim that would be contingent on context.

You seem to be arguing that the acceptability is dependent on historical context. In that case you might have chosen "It use to be acceptable, but it is no longer acceptable to execute heretics." Or you might have chosen, "It is sometimes acceptable to execute heretics" and then argued the "sometimes" is dependent on the historical context.

I stated in the OP my position which is: If it is wrong today, then it was wrong then. I put it that way in order to convey that it is always wrong to execute heretics. That is an absolute. Therefore, I chose "It is never acceptable to execute heretics." I see why you might be reading that in the present tense. The "is never" is intended to convey an absolute. Does that help?

If you take the position that the moral imperative is an absolute, as I do, then even though they found it acceptable in the past doesn't somehow make it right. On the contrary, if it is never acceptable, then they were wrong. An absolute moral imperative doesn't change with context, presumably.

Again, all of this arguable. So, I look forward to your argument that, in this instance, the acceptability of executing heretics depends on the context.
 
Upvote 0

timothyu

Well-Known Member
Dec 31, 2018
24,640
9,262
up there
✟380,343.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Or was dogmatic certainty just a ruse to keep the church flush with power and money?
A convenient tool, yes. In the world of man the majority, be it secular or Christianity will seek to defend it's institutions while the minority will seek to defend the Kingdom of Go9d.
 
Upvote 0

yeshuaslavejeff

simple truth, martyr, disciple of Yahshua
Jan 6, 2005
39,946
11,096
okie
✟222,536.00
Faith
Anabaptist
Governments, militaries, etc, may or might and do execute people for anything from a whim to destroying a city or anything else they 'choose' to do so for - including for their beliefs/ faith/ life.

As far as I know though, Ekklesia never take part in any execution, nor in helping one to happen.
 
Upvote 0

keith99

sola dosis facit venenum
Jan 16, 2008
23,111
6,801
72
✟378,751.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
The idea that the Church didn't want the Bible translated into local languages in order to keep people from reading it is a myth you'd do well not to continue spreading.

Foxxe disagrees. Answers in Genesis disagrees.

What would you consider a reliable source? I can hunt for my copy of Foxes Book of Martyrs and get a few names of men burnt at the stake for teh crime of translating Scripture into the vulgar tongue.

EDIT: So does the Christian Science Monitor.

The men who risked all to translate the Bible
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

JackRT

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2015
15,722
16,445
82
small town Ontario, Canada
✟767,445.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married
Foxxe disagrees. Answers in Genesis disagrees.

What would you consider a reliable source? I can hunt for my copy of Foxes Book of Martyrs and get a few names of men burnt at the stake for teh crime of translating Scripture into the vulgar tongue.

Ironic isn't it that at one time Latin was the vulgar tongue? Think "Latin Vulgate".
 
Reactions: public hermit
Upvote 0

klutedavid

Well-Known Member
Dec 7, 2013
9,346
4,337
Sydney, Australia.
✟252,364.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
When Jesus returns will He not return in blazing fire, and will He not destroy the heretics?

We are in a war.

Has the church burned heretics?

Does fire purify or not?

Christians don't burn heretics because that is forbidden. An inquisitor is endowed with the authority to burn heretics.

Now we enter the scramble world of church tradition.
 
Upvote 0

durangodawood

re Member
Aug 28, 2007
27,510
19,192
Colorado
✟537,089.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Well, now I find it unacceptable to execute heretics.

But if I put myself back in the 13th century, what would I think, given I'd have 13th c education (likely none), went to a 13th c church with other 13th c parishioners, had 13th c friends and parents? I would likely think like a 13th c person. And if they typically thought burning OK, I probably would too. Wouldnt you?
 
Reactions: JackRT
Upvote 0

Robban

-----------
Site Supporter
Dec 27, 2009
11,616
3,170
✟811,194.00
Country
Sweden
Gender
Male
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Divorced

Are ISIS members also endowed with
authority to saw off peoples heads?
 
Upvote 0

public hermit

social troglodyte
Site Supporter
Aug 20, 2019
12,463
13,284
East Coast
✟1,043,990.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

I agree. However, that doesn't mean my approval of it would somehow make it right. Humans, throughout history, have approved of many horrendous things. Their approval of those things didn't make those things morally good. John Calvin thought that Michael Servetus should be burned at the stake. We can consider his context in trying to understand why he thought that was a good thing. But, whether it was good or not has nothing to do with Calvin's approval of it.

I should probably be forthcoming here and say I am assuming there are some moral absolutes. For instance, I would argue that it is always wrong to torture the innocent. Someone might, by mistake, torture an innocent person because they thought that innocent person was guilty (maybe they thought that person was a terrorist who had information that would lead to the harm of others). Okay, we have a reason for why they tortured the innocent. That reason still doesn't make it good or right. Was it a mistake? Sure. Was it good and right? No.
 
Reactions: 2PhiloVoid
Upvote 0

Robban

-----------
Site Supporter
Dec 27, 2009
11,616
3,170
✟811,194.00
Country
Sweden
Gender
Male
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Divorced
Are ISIS members called inquisitors?

Severing a head is not biblical.

Burning with fire purifies.

It is thought by some that the victims of the inquisitors were the souls of Baals prophets
reincarnated.

Where does it say burning people alive is OK?

Even cremation should be avoided at all costs.

"Burning with fire" purifies?

Is this the 10 o clock news from the abyss?
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.