• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Buddhists forum, less detachment

Status
Not open for further replies.

Gottservant

God loves your words, may men love them also
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2006
11,383
704
46
✟276,687.00
Faith
Messianic
Hi there,

So as someone who has understood detachment by the end of his life - I would like to request a Buddhists forum.

Be still and know that only the Lord calls himself Lord, in the end.

Without patience, who would write "selah"?

Thank you and thank you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brinny

Gottservant

God loves your words, may men love them also
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2006
11,383
704
46
✟276,687.00
Faith
Messianic
no, this is a christian site, why would we have a buddhist forum?

I just saw an obvious connection with exact same possibility of discussion about science that we 'yet have not'?

If not compelled by the word 'still", do nothing.
 
Upvote 0

brinny

everlovin' shiner of light in dark places
Site Supporter
Mar 23, 2004
249,106
114,203
✟1,378,064.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Constitution
Hi there,

So as someone who has understood detachment by the end of his life - I would like to request a Buddhists forum.

Be still and know that only the Lord calls himself Lord, in the end.

Without patience, who would write "selah"?

Thank you and thank you.

Hi brother.

Can you share more detail on what you mean by detachment, if you don't mind?
 
Upvote 0

Gottservant

God loves your words, may men love them also
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2006
11,383
704
46
✟276,687.00
Faith
Messianic
Well, the restoration of a word to order, neither yes nor less yes - scientifically, here is discussed; but in the context of the necessary patience to have understood it to have meant some thing either way, is yet completely and entirely absent (not "of").

You are commanded to wait, you are told be still, the word is "do not call yourself sick before or after".


The point being, I believe, you did not have because you did not ask, you do not have because you do not ask and what you do you ask because you want to waste it and yet later "the only thing more asked later... is... ask more... ask more and later ("what are you waiting for?")".

I am not waxing lyrical: I am saying "discuss waiting".
 
Upvote 0

com7fy8

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2013
14,744
6,642
Massachusetts
✟655,332.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Ok, Gott Servant . . . I am Bill . . . good to see you, God bless you :)

Yes, we children of God need to be still and wait on the LORD. But if I understand correctly, the Buddhist way of being still is not in order to pay attention to God and submit to Him and seek Him to rule us in His peace as all of us Jesus people are called to do >

"And let the peace of God rule in your hearts, to which also you were called in one body; and be thankful." (Colossians 3:15)

And we in Jesus need to depend on how our Father makes us still and submissive; we need to not try to make this a do-it-ourselves effort to make ourselves humble and obedient.

"Not that we are sufficient of ourselves to think of anything as being from ourselves; but our sufficiency is from God," (2 Corinthians 3:5)

So, we of our own selves are not sufficient to make ourselves obey God, including by being still and resting in Him (Psalm 37:7) But in God's grace living in us we have all we need of God through Jesus. "We need how God's grace . . . the effect, action of God's own love . . . makes us submissive and pleasing to Him in "the incorruptible beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit, which is very precious in the sight of God." (in 1 Peter 3:4) Our own human will's self effort can not make us like this!!

However . . . to my knowledge . . . Buddhism in general is more about how an individual can get oneself to be still and peaceful and rested. But the resulting quality for this is not as good and beneficial as the beauty and quality of our rest and refreshing which we have in God's love (Romans 5:5) through Jesus. And to my knowledge Buddhists in general do not first acknowledge and trust and depend on Jesus as God's way to bring them to peace and rest and refreshing, with correction to make them personally submissive to our Father in His peace ruling them in their hearts.

"Of course", some number of Jesus naming people are not about this, too.

But I find the Bible is clear about who is the One who changes us and has us truly doing His will >

"for it is God who works in you both to will and to do for His good pleasure." (Philippians 2:13)

So, I see that even our willing, which is truly of God, is worked in us, God working us to will what He desires . . . God knowing what He desires, and we do not know since we are not God to know what at each moment He wants to share with us. So we depend on Him and not at all on ourselves . . . as much as we have grown in this and matured in this :)

But, like I offer, Buddhism is not about seeking our Father of Jesus Christ for how He corrects us (Hebrews 12:4-10), and for how He alone can make us still and submissive to Him in His perfect peace. They do not name Jesus as their way to perfect spiritual and emotional rest; and only Jesus can give us true rest > Matthew 11:28-30.
 
Upvote 0

Victory of the Cross

Jesus is the Word of God
Mar 3, 2005
28,482
1,127
39
✟56,510.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Engaged
Well, the restoration of a word to order, neither yes nor less yes - scientifically, here is discussed; but in the context of the necessary patience to have understood it to have meant some thing either way, is yet completely and entirely absent (not "of").

You are commanded to wait, you are told be still, the word is "do not call yourself sick before or after".


The point being, I believe, you did not have because you did not ask, you do not have because you do not ask and what you do you ask because you want to waste it and yet later "the only thing more asked later... is... ask more... ask more and later ("what are you waiting for?")".

I am not waxing lyrical: I am saying "discuss waiting".
Did you use to be the grandmaster of the jedi order by any chance? ;)

I am not sure if you are using google translate but your posts make no sense at all , they are a garbled mess of words with only a few parts readable., it maybe a good idea to look for a better translation service :)
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.