It's irresponsible to state cause of death when it hasn't been determined yet.
Unless you get knocked over by a bus AIDS sufferers generally die from complications of AIDS.
May this poor man rest in peace.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It's irresponsible to state cause of death when it hasn't been determined yet.
You're a little late to the party, and the OP did not mention a cause of death. I was asking for accuracy. Context.Unless you get knocked over by a bus AIDS sufferers generally die from complications of AIDS.
May this poor man rest in peace.
You're a little late to the party, and the OP did not mention a cause of death. I was asking for accuracy. Context.
Um, you pretty clearly said he DIED of AIDS. There's plenty of people with AIDS who aren't dying of it. They're not interchangeable terms anymore.
Who says he died of anything AIDS related is, I think, kind of the point of this discussion?I think it just makes it more easier than saying a person died from complications that arose from AIDS and then stating what was the actual cause of death.
Who says he died of anything AIDS related is, I think, kind of the point of this discussion?
The point in contention is whether or not anyone with access to the facts has said his death was caused by AIDS related complications. I admit I've only been skimming the thread, but there seem to be a lot of people saying that he necessarily died of ARC because he had AIDS. I'm not saying he didn't, but it is worth noting that AIDS doesn't= dying of ARC anymore. HIV even less so.I don't understand what you are saying. his wife said he did have AIDS, was bedridden for a year and that he died from cardiac arrest and a blood infection.
The point in contention is whether or not anyone with access to the facts has said his death was caused by AIDS related complications. I admit I've only been skimming the thread, but there seem to be a lot of people saying that he necessarily died of ARC because he had AIDS. I'm not saying he didn't, but it is worth noting that AIDS doesn't= dying of ARC anymore. HIV even less so.
Not with access to appropriately advanced health care. in SSA AIDS, even HIV, is pretty much a death sentence. But in most of the OECD countries, people with AIDS can expect the same sort of longevity and quality of life as a common or garden leukaemia sufferer.this is the first I am hearing of this I must admit. I know people with HIV can live long lives without any complications but people with AIDS start living on borrowed time.
Not with access to appropriately advanced health care. in SSA AIDS, even HIV, is pretty much a death sentence. But in most of the OECD countries, people with AIDS can expect the same sort of longevity and quality of life as a common or garden leukaemia sufferer.
I think NHL is up around an 85% 5 year survival rate these days. *sigh* Give me a moment and I'll look up AIDS life expectancy for you.which is how long?
I think NHL is up around an 85% 5 year survival rate these days. *sigh* Give me a moment and I'll look up AIDS life expectancy for you.
^ Jump up to: a b Antiretroviral Therapy Cohort Collaboration (2008). "Life expectancy of individuals on combination antiretroviral therapy in high-income countries: a collaborative analysis of 14 cohort studies". Lancet 372 (9635): 293–9. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61113-7. PMC 3130543. PMID 18657708.HAART and appropriate prevention of opportunistic infections reduces the death rate by 80%, and raises the life expectancy for a newly diagnosed young adult to 20–50 years
All cancer survival rates are measured in terms of the percentage of survivors 5 years after diagnosis. An 85% 5 year survival rate means that, out of 100 people diagnosed with the disease, in 5 years time, 85 will still be alive given the current medical standards. According to the article I just found, they're saying a life expectancy of 20-50 years for an AIDS sufferer with appropriate intervention. Without treatment, its more like 6-18 months. This isn't really my field by the way, so you may want to do your own research.five years isn't what I would call long. longer then the one or two years I originally thought.
^ Jump up to: a b Antiretroviral Therapy Cohort Collaboration (2008). "Life expectancy of individuals on combination antiretroviral therapy in high-income countries: a collaborative analysis of 14 cohort studies". Lancet 372 (9635): 2939. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61113-7. PMC 3130543. PMID 18657708.
Sorry, my mistake.the article talks about treating HIV. not AIDS.
Deutsches Ärzteblatt international: The Treatment of Patients With HIV (19.07.2010)for example, if treatment is begun following the diagnosis of AIDS, life expectancy is ~1040 years
the article talks about how germans are late in diagnosing AIDS. it also talks about using HAART on those who have HIV. I tried finding the quote in the article you provided but it's not there.