• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Bottleneck Theory vs The Flood vs The Tribe of Benjamin

Status
Not open for further replies.

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,334
52,694
Guam
✟5,171,212.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
In bottleneck theory, you have a population tooling along at a given rate: say 1 billion strong.

Then a bottleneck event* occurs, and the population is severely reduced: say to 1 million.

At this point, two things can happen: a bottleneck recovery or a bottleneck extinction.

I contend that God intervened after the Flood and prevented a bottleneck extinction.

Genesis 9:1 And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth.


Later on, the tribe of Benjamin came very close to extinction in the Battle of Gibeah (Judges 19-21), but God intervened and brought it back.

Thoughts?

* catastrophism in action
 

Jadis40

Senior Member
Sep 19, 2004
963
192
52
Indiana, USA
✟62,145.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Or the simplest explanation, and in my mind the evidence we've found overwhelmingly uncovered is that there was never a planet-wide flood, hence no bottleneck, hence there was no need for intervention.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,334
52,694
Guam
✟5,171,212.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Or the simplest explanation, and in my mind the evidence we've found overwhelmingly uncovered is that there was never a planet-wide flood, hence no bottleneck, hence there was no need for intervention.
Even a local flood would have brought Noah's line close to extinction.
 
Upvote 0

JD16

What Would Evolution Do?
Site Supporter
Jan 21, 2017
823
587
Melbourne
✟87,388.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married

That is, of course presuming an actual 'bottleneck event' did occur....and in your example,....a population of 1 million can easily repopulate the earth given time,....not so with just 8 people
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,334
52,694
Guam
✟5,171,212.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
....and in your example,....a population of 1 million can easily repopulate the earth given time,
It depends on the robustness of the survivors: they may not be genetically fit to recover.
 
Upvote 0

JD16

What Would Evolution Do?
Site Supporter
Jan 21, 2017
823
587
Melbourne
✟87,388.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
It depends on the robustness of the survivors: they may not be genetically fit to recover.

1 million is pretty viable, in fact there is a theory that a natural disaster about 75,000 years ago and drop the human population to about 3-10k in total

"According to the genetic bottleneck theory, between 50,000 and 100,000 years ago, human populations sharply decreased to 3,000–10,000 surviving individuals.It is supported by genetic evidence suggesting that today's humans are descended from a very small population of between 1,000 and 10,000 breeding pairs that existed about 70,000 years ago"

Toba catastrophe theory - Wikipedia
 
Reactions: Jadis40
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,334
52,694
Guam
✟5,171,212.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
1 million is pretty viable, in fact there is a theory that a natural disaster about 75,000 years ago and drop the human population to about 3-10k in total
I somehow don't think 1 million people is a guarantee that a bottleneck recovery will always occur.

And for the record, 8 people after the Flood is 4 times the number of people who existed on the earth just 7 chapters earlier.
 
Upvote 0

CrystalDragon

Well-Known Member
Apr 28, 2016
3,119
1,664
US
✟56,261.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single


Haven't people been saying "the day of the Lord is right around the corner" since the days of the Apostles? It was expected to be in their lifetimes, even.
 
Upvote 0

Grandpa2390

The Grey
Feb 24, 2017
1,527
781
New Orleans
✟57,853.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
I somehow don't think 1 million people is a guarantee that a bottleneck recovery will always occur.

And for the record, 8 people after the Flood is 4 times the number of people who existed on the earth just 7 chapters earlier.

I like your signature.
I believe there is plenty of evidence for a global flood. A bottleneck certainly did occur at some point in the "recent" past for some reason or another. That is without doubt in my mind.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,334
52,694
Guam
✟5,171,212.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Haven't people been saying "the day of the Lord is right around the corner" since the days of the Apostles? It was expected to be in their lifetimes, even.
Yes -- and those who complain about it are called "scoffers."

2 Peter 3:3 Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts,
2 Peter 3:4 And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation.
 
Reactions: Heissonear
Upvote 0

JD16

What Would Evolution Do?
Site Supporter
Jan 21, 2017
823
587
Melbourne
✟87,388.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
And for the record, 8 people after the Flood is 4 times the number of people who existed on the earth just 7 chapters earlier.

Again, that is presuming that the history of mankind is as told by the genesis account,....science says otherwise.

You do understand the dangers of inbreeding right? The severe consequences that it can have on the bloodline,.....european monarchs used to have that problem

Charles II of Spain - Wikipedia
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

CrystalDragon

Well-Known Member
Apr 28, 2016
3,119
1,664
US
✟56,261.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single


But it's said multiple times in the Bible that the day of the Lord was going to occur any day now for them. That they would still be alive at the time. There's only a small window of time that can be considered "soon" or "at the door", or "we who are alive, who are left until the coming of the Lord"...

It was all clearly supposed to happen in the lifetime of the Apostles. It didn't.
 
Reactions: JD16
Upvote 0

JD16

What Would Evolution Do?
Site Supporter
Jan 21, 2017
823
587
Melbourne
✟87,388.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

Grandpa2390

The Grey
Feb 24, 2017
1,527
781
New Orleans
✟57,853.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
maybe in the natural world 8 people are not genetically diverse enough to populate the earth. I was reading about health issues and the difficulty getting pregnant after so long. (maybe it isn't due to our diet, eh? lol)
But this is not the natural world, God ordained this.
 
Upvote 0

-57

Well-Known Member
Sep 5, 2015
8,701
1,957
✟85,158.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private

One has to define just what a bottleneck would look like..how to measure it. I see it this way.
There was a much greater percentage of heterozygosity in the pre-Flood genome compared to the percentage we see today. The other is the amount of junk DNA...species are de-evolving.
 
Reactions: AV1611VET
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,334
52,694
Guam
✟5,171,212.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You do understand the dangers of inbreeding right?
Eyaaa ... without looking it up, I think it's called ... um ... well ... I'll look it up.

Inbreeding depression.
 
Reactions: Grandpa2390
Upvote 0

Jadis40

Senior Member
Sep 19, 2004
963
192
52
Indiana, USA
✟62,145.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
That is, of course presuming an actual 'bottleneck event' did occur....and in your example,....a population of 1 million can easily repopulate the earth given time,....not so with just 8 people

Exactly. I've done the math. It doesn't add up. (No pun intended.)

Let's go from the alleged date for the flood that's commonly cited by YECs - 2348. Ignoring the historical fact that there were numerous civilizations that existed before 2348 BC and in 2349 BC. Here's what I came up with:

2348 BC 8 people.
2349 BC (Assuming Noah's wives and the 3 sons wives were all pregnant and had a baby within the year given for the flood, that means that at most there were 12 people. (Not accounting for the possibility of twins.)
2350 BC Let's say they had 4 more babies each... that will get you to 16 people.

See where I'm going with this?

It's nonsense, and I'm honest enough to recognize it's nonsense.
 
Reactions: JD16
Upvote 0

Radrook

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2016
11,539
2,726
USA
Visit site
✟150,380.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
That is, of course presuming an actual 'bottleneck event' did occur....

There is genetic evidence that a bottleneck did occur and that the population numbers dropped far below the level that you consider untenable for repopulation and yet here we are!

Genetic bottleneck theory
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.