Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
perhaps you and i have a different definition for biased
biased is when someone can say nothing good - or nothing bad
everyone has good points and bad - so fair is where the good and bad are shared
pbs can share nothing good about trump - and misrepresent God the bible and christianity
aclj share facts and when people start getting unkind the hosts bring people back to the christian principle of praying for everyone rather than getting in their face/getting violent/harassing - they do everything legally and properly
jay sekulow has only been trump's lawyer for a short time compared to how long he has been hosting his daily broadcast - he's a straight arrow that stands up for what is right - being trump's lawyer does not change that fact
fox and friends shows what d's say and what r's say - they often give more time to what d's say
i certainly do not agree with who all they put in the factual category - if that is how you are deciding who is biased and who is factual we will be perpetually in disagreement
@FreeinChrist
how long have you been watching aclj daily?
how long have you been watching f&f daily?
you bet veritas is being sued for exposing crooks - that's how crooks behave - but the video tells the truth - the person themselves exposes themselves on tape - not veritas' fault that someone confesses to wrongs and is caught on tape
I don't think you understand what bias is at all.i certainly do not agree with who all they put in the factual category - if that is how you are deciding who is biased and who is factual we will be perpetually in disagreement
i listened to bbc - all they do is say "american sources say" and then they proceed to quote msm
the rest of them at the top are msm - they are opposed to anything christian/israeli/american/nationalist - open to anything muslim/atheist/globalist - that imo is biased - and as a christian i can't support it
well all the guys at the top of that chart are biased leftThat is not what bias is.
bias | Definition of bias in English by Oxford Dictionaries
NOUN
1. mass noun Inclination or prejudice for or against one person or group, especially in a way considered to be unfair.
It means the source is showing bias when they report from their own viewpoint of the topic rather than the fact and evidence. It is related to prejudice. Foxnews and Sekelow report with a right wing viewpoint over the facts in evidence.
If the facts show the a person negatively, then those are the facts. Reporting that a person did something bad, or shows bad character is not bias if that is born out of the facts.
That is ...hilarious. They edit their videos to show things as they wish, using deceit and lies to get to their targets.
Fox News presents news to their own right wing aims. They are very biased in how they present the news.
This thread is on the border wall.
imo you are also admitting to left wing biasI don't think you understand what bias is at all.
You are basically admitting to a right wing bias.
yes the border wall is the topic - how did we get onto this?No, the guys are the top are not biased left. The Wall Street Journal is not left - it is owned by Murdoch. Look at the chart better. I don't think you understand what bias is.
Again (3rd) this thread is on the border wall.
i explained how i can only give you cable options
accept that or not - but don't keep asking the same questions repeatedly
The Berlin wall was build to divide a city...a city that once has been one city in one county. It divided families and neighbors and "Germans". The division created two new countries from a country that has once been one.
The wall on the southern border of the US is to divide TWO DIFFERENT countries...and keep the citizens of one country from illegally invading another.
There is no comparison.
Is Mexico paying for the wall?
actually didn't you hear that there is a new fair trade deal with mexico - so the hundreds of millions of dollars that puts back into america on a yearly basis is how mexico is paying for the wallWell, no. He just said that to make the sale.
actually didn't you hear that there is a new fair trade deal with mexico - so the hundreds of billions of dollars that puts back into america on a yearly basis is how mexico is paying for the wall
you didn't think when trump said mexico was paying that he meant they were going to pay the contractors building the wall did you?
we knew what he meant if you didn't
the only thing with a 20% tax is steel and aluminum and possibly carsYou actually believe that the trade deal is going to give us hundreds of billions of dollars from Mexico? Last year, total exports to Mexico were about 270 billion.
Last. time I checked, Trump was saying he intended to put a 20 percent tax on goods coming in from Mexico. Obviously, that would mean Americans would be paying for it. Trump dropped that idea when his staff explained to him why it wouldn't be Mexico paying for it. Now you're telling us about his new story. If you thought about it, you'd realize Mexico won't be paying that way, either.
Everyone knows that wasn't his first story. Just saying.
actually didn't you hear that there is a new fair trade deal with mexico - so the hundreds of millions of dollars that puts back into america on a yearly basis is how mexico is paying for the wall
you didn't think when trump said mexico was paying that he meant they were going to pay the contractors building the wall did you?
we knew what he meant if you didn't
you missed what i said - you misunderstood what trump meant - o well - it will happen whether you understand or not - time will prove it - just as with all trump's promised keptI thought it meant exactly what Trump said it meant - that Mexico was going to TOTALLY PAY FOR IT.
Meaning, no legalese circumlocution that begs the question of a phantom payment rather than evidence of an honorable agreement (i.e. an up front agreement). Mexico said it is never paying for a wall
Mexico’s foreign minister is again insisting his country will never pay for President Donald Trump’s long-promised border wall.So, you are deluded, role-playing or you are insinuating that Trump is going to fraud the Mexican government through a trade agreement.
Trump was meeting with the president of FIFA Tuesday when he said his stalled wall “will be paid for, very easily, by Mexico. It will ultimately be paid for by Mexico.”
The comment came a day after Trump and Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto held a celebratory call to announce the new deal.
Mexican Foreign Minister Luis Videgaray Caso tweets that Mexico “just reached a trade understanding with the US, and the outlook for the relationship between our two countries is very positive.”
But he says his country has been “absolutely clear” that Mexico “will NEVER pay for a wall.”
The Latest: Mexico says again it will never pay for wall | Boston.com
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?