• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Bode's Rule

David Waffen

Great American
Apr 29, 2004
697
41
46
The greatest nation on Earth
✟1,060.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Mercury
0, (0 + 4)/10 = .4AU vs 0.39AU (Actual)​
Venus
3, (3 + 4)/10 = .7AU vs 0.729AU (Actual)​
Earth
6, (3 + 4)/10 = 1AU vs 1.0AU (Actual)​
Mars
12, (3 + 4)/10 = 1.6AU vs 1.52U (Actual)​
Asteriod Belt
24, (24 + 4)/10 = 2.8AU vs ~2.5AU (Actual)​
Jupiter
48, (48 + 4)/10 = 5.2AU vs 5.2AU (Actual)​
Saturn
96, (96 + 4)/10 = 10.0AU vs 9.54AU (Actual)​
Uranus
192, (192 + 4)/10 = 19.6AU vs 19.2AU (Actual)​
Neptune
384, (384 + 4)/10 = 38.8AU vs 30.1AU (Actual)​


Comments?
 

MSBS

Well-Known Member
Jul 29, 2002
1,860
103
California
✟18,091.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Bode's law, also known as Titius's law or the Titius-Bode law, empirical relationship between the mean distances of the planets from the sun. If each number in the series 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, … (where a new number is twice the previous number) is increased by 4 and divided by 10 to form the series 0.4, 0.7, 1.0, 1.6, 2.8, 5.2, 10.0, 19.6, 38.8, 77.2, … , Bode's law holds that this series gives the mean distances of the planets from the sun, expressed in astronomical units . When this relationship was discovered by Titius of Wittenberg in 1766 and published by Bode six years later, it gave good agreement with the actual mean distances of the planets that were then known—Mercury (0.39), Venus (0.72), Earth (1.0), Mars (1.52), Jupiter (5.2), and Saturn (9.55). Uranus, discovered in 1781, has mean orbital distance 19.2, which also agrees. The asteroid Ceres, discovered 1801, has mean orbital distance 2.77, which fills the apparent gap between Mars and Jupiter. However, Neptune, discovered 1846, has mean orbital distance 30.1, and Pluto, discovered 1930, has mean orbital distance 39.5; these are large discrepancies from the positions 38.8 and 77.2, respectively, predicted by Bode's law. Some theories of the origin of the solar system have tried to explain the apparent regularity in the mean orbital distances of the planets, arguing that it could not arise by chance, but must be a manifestation of the laws of physics. Some astronomers hold that the deviation of Neptune and Pluto from their predicted positions signifies that they are no longer at their original positions in the solar system. However, since Bode's law is not a law in the usual scientific sense, i.e., it is not universal and invariant, it alone should not be taken as evidence for such a conclusion.
from:

http://www.encyclopedia.com/html/B/Bodeslaw.asp
 
Upvote 0

David Waffen

Great American
Apr 29, 2004
697
41
46
The greatest nation on Earth
✟1,060.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Using methods employed in the biological and medical fields, let's see the odds of this happening. Keep in mind that 5% or less chance of something being due to chance alone is considered 'factual' in the world of biology.

Here we use (Outcome - Expected)^2 divided by the expected to determine deviation:
M(.01)(.01)/(.39) = 2.56 x 10^-4
V(.029)(.029)/(.729) = .0012
E(0)(0) = 0
M(.08)(.08)/(1.52) =.0042
J(0)(0) = 0
S(.46)(.46)/(9.54) = .0482
U(.4)(.4)/(19.2) = .0208
N(8.7)(8.7)/(30.1) = 2.5146

We see that the first seven categories only add up to .0744.
We can have as much as 1.239 deviation to conclude a 99% chance that this data is not due to chance alone.

We see that all eight categories add up to .2589, when 2.733 deviation is allowed for a 95% chance that this data is not due to chance alone.
 
Upvote 0

Mistermystery

Here's looking at you kid
Apr 19, 2004
4,220
169
✟5,275.00
Faith
Atheist
David Waffen said:
Comments?
Yes:

1) I wish there was an option that could force other members to confromt previous points that haven't been awnsered before they are allowed to start a new thread

2) What is your point?

3) What is your major malfunction?

4) ...

5) Profit!
 
Upvote 0

Mistermystery

Here's looking at you kid
Apr 19, 2004
4,220
169
✟5,275.00
Faith
Atheist
David Waffen said:
Using methods employed in the biological and medical fields, let's see the odds of this happening. Keep in mind that 5% or less chance of something being due to chance alone is considered 'factual' in the world of biology.

Here we use (Outcome - Expected)^2 divided by the expected to determine deviation:
M(.01)(.01)/(.39) = 2.56 x 10^-4
V(.029)(.029)/(.729) = .0012
E(0)(0) = 0
M(.08)(.08)/(1.52) =.0042
J(0)(0) = 0
S(.46)(.46)/(9.54) = .0482
U(.4)(.4)/(19.2) = .0208
N(8.7)(8.7)/(30.1) = 2.5146

We see that the first seven categories only add up to .0744.
We can have as much as 1.239 deviation to conclude a 99% chance that this data is not due to chance alone.

We see that all eight categories add up to .2589, when 2.733 deviation is allowed for a 95% chance that this data is not due to chance alone.
Hahah. That's just funny.
 
Upvote 0
J

Jet Black

Guest
hey, waffen:

bohrradius2.gif


would you look at that, the diameter of an atom is a combination of those simple numbers. weird eh?
 
Upvote 0

David Waffen

Great American
Apr 29, 2004
697
41
46
The greatest nation on Earth
✟1,060.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Magnus Vile said:
They do though. In 100% of all known solar systems containing the Earth.

What are you comparing our solar system to?

I think it is obvious, our Universe is laid out in such a way to prove something to us.
 
Upvote 0

David Waffen

Great American
Apr 29, 2004
697
41
46
The greatest nation on Earth
✟1,060.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Mistermystery said:
Yes:

1) I wish there was an option that could force other members to confromt previous points that haven't been awnsered before they are allowed to start a new thread

More lies?

2) What is your point?

3) What is your major malfunction?

4) ...

5) Profit!

Those attacks are not called for. There is no profit except to watch evolutionists squirm as I trap them with math and science.
 
Upvote 0

Mistermystery

Here's looking at you kid
Apr 19, 2004
4,220
169
✟5,275.00
Faith
Atheist
David Waffen said:
More lies?
coming from you? yes.



Those attacks are not called for. There is no profit except to watch evolutionists squirm as I trap them with math and science.
That profit line was a joke, which apperently you didn't get. evolve some humor Waffle.
 
Upvote 0