Sarah Sarah
Well-Known Member
Even if we accept that two years was a bit excessive, what is really the point that it raises. I could agree that one year, or even six months, would have been sufficient. How much difference does that make in the greater scheme of things? It's only a question that goes how the court chose to implement the law in this particular case, not the law itself. How many of us can honestly say that of all the people in prison in their countries, there aren't some that got longer sentences than they deserved? Why hold Russia to a higher standard?
This was a sentence for hooliganism and inciting religious hatred. The Russian Prime Minister said the five months these women served pre-trial should have been enough. And that a sentence of one year or more would be unproductive.
I think the sentence was made harsh due to the attacks PR made on Putin as well. Political retaliation being key perhaps. Also, there were other women with the group that escaped arrest. The sentence may have been stiff due to the women refusing to name their accomplices in this act also.
Upvote
0