Black Evolution.

[Humanista]

I don't understand how evolution can be racist of all humans--Anglo Saxon, Asian, African--descended from a common AFrican ancestor. That would make EVERYONE African or "black" if you go back far enough.

We're all the same.

 

[BloodandHonor]

People required larger brains in harsher terrains, ie the wintery north, so they evolved that way after they left Africa (according to the out of Africa theory). It is easier to live in the Africa than Europe. That is not racist, it's logic.

 

[john crawford]

Err... first off, it's African apes.

Secondly the theory teaches that not only are Africans descendants of African apes, but that we Westerners are descendants of Africans! So this "racist" theory teaches that every white man in existance is descendant over the millenia from a black man.

VERY racist.

Yes, quite, seeing how the Chinese didn't descend from either white or black men from either Europe or Africa.

 

[john crawford]

So, what is this? Is it an argument against evolution? If so, it's a textbook example of a strawman.

Every argument against evolutionism must be a classic "textbook" example of a 'strawman,' no? How else could evolutionism be beleived in?

 

[john crawford]

This is simply too much. I can't take this idiocy anymore. This forum only makes me sad. Goodbye.

Goodbye.

 

[Vastavus]

Every argument against evolutionism must be a classic "textbook" example of a 'strawman,' no? How else could evolutionism be beleived in?

::Slams head on desk::

 

[john crawford]

Wow.

Just when I think creationist arguments couldn't get more idiotic and desperate, along comes someone to prove that there is no lower limit to idiocy....

How so? It's one thing to tar and feather your opponents with innuendos. Quite another to prove them historically or scientifically wrong.

 

[john crawford]

I'm sure everyone who had slaves before Darwin's theory came along were not racists…the black people just volunteered to work for them for no fee and brutal whippings.

Racism was always around. It just took the Darwinists to justify it scientifically.

 

[Lilandra]

People required larger brains in harsher terrains, ie the wintery north, so they evolved that way after they left Africa (according to the out of Africa theory). It is easier to live in the Africa than Europe. That is not racist, it's logic.

It's easier to live in Africa? Therefore people in Europe required larger brains?

How about some evidence showing that a modern European brain is larger than an modern African brain?

 

[corvus_corax]

From the site, based upon the racism of Darwin and his contemporaries-
"It is the position of this writer that this type (or any type) of racism has no place in the curriculum of our schools. While we are not accusing the educational establishment of racism, we do point out that acceptance of racism, whether de facto or by design, results in the same thing. There is no excuse for racism to be tolerated. It is a shame that our schools still condone it. There must be pressures brought to bear on leadership to put an end to this shameful era in our nation's history. It is time to put an end to all vestiges of racism in education; it is time to 'Out the Darweenies.' "


My response, based on the anti-semetism of the various church fathers-
"It is the position of this writer that this type (or any type) of anti-semitism has no place in churches. While we are not accusing the churches of anti-semitism, we do point out that acceptance of racism, whether de facto or by design, results in the same thing. There is no excuse for racism to be tolerated. It is a shame that our churches still condone it. There must be pressures brought to bear on leadership to put an end to this shameful era in our nation's history. It is time to put an end to all vestiges of racism in church; it is time to 'Out the Fatherees.' "


Yes, let us definitely throw the baby out with the bathwater.

 

[Vastavus]

Racism was always around. It just took the Darwinists to justify it scientifically.

Sorry, I don't understand, could you explain please?

 

[john crawford]

QUOTE=Lucretius: "Science is not racist."

How do you know? Did you conduct some "scientific" test to prove is isn't?"

"Only foolish misinterpretations of what the theory actually says are."

Ha, ha ha. Prove it rather than just postulating your religious opinion about scientific racism.

"arwin did not advocate racism, yet you try and force a racist agenda on the theory because it disagrees with unscientific YECism."

Ho, ho ho. How do you know what scientific or "unscientific" racism is? Don't tell me you are going to employ the "scientific method" to arrive at the correct solution.

"The Theory of Evolution is one of the strongest theories existent in modern day science. Just because you try and make it racist doesn't make it so, nor does it falsify it."

The racist theory of human evolutionism has not only been socially proved to be racially prejudiced and biased but has also been proven to be scientifically falsified.

"Besides, evolution is not racist."

Yes, it is. Any cultural theory which relegates some humans to a primitive status is racist. Especially, a biological Anglo-Saxon theory.

"Racism is a human construct, it is subjective. Evolution is an objective fact."

Evolution is a human construct. It is subjective. Racism is an objective fact.

 

[corvus_corax]

The racist theory of human evolutionism has not only been socially proved to be racially prejudiced and biased but has also been proven to be scientifically falsified.

It's been falsified? Sweet! What peer reviewed journal was this falsification submitted to and when is this person receiving their nobel prize?

Please point me to the evidence that has falisified evolution

Yes, it is. Any cultural theory which relegates some humans to a primitive status is racist. Especially, a biological Anglo-Saxon theory.

Social darwinism is not evolution

 

[john crawford]

Please identify just one article published in a reputable peer-reviewed scientific journal that argues that evolution is false.

That would be like looking for an article in a Christian publication arguing that Christianity is false.

 

[Magnus Vile]

How so? It's one thing to tar and feather your opponents with innuendos. Quite another to prove them historically or scientifically wrong.

Actually, if I were planning to tar and feather my opponents I'd use tar and feathers instead of innuendo. It's tricky to get the feathers to stick to innuendos...

Prove evolution wrong, see how much I care. Go ahead. Make my millenium. But please, don't try arguing that evolution = racism and expect anyone to take your argument as anything other than a factless rant.

All I have ever seen you post, in the way of argument is, "I don't like evolution = Evolution is false."

 

[troodon]

In response to the OP I will quote a song that I enjoy, mostly because that's all it deserves:

"Can't avoid that
evolution is fact.
We're all from the same Lucy
despite differences you see."

That is all

 

[Lucretius]

Evolution is a human construct. It is subjective. Racism is an objective fact.

Wrong, if you weren't here to observe it; Evolution would still have occured. Without human beings however, there is no racism. Just because one animal is stronger than another does not imply racism. Racism is political and often emotional, but it doesn't exist in nature.

 

[Vastavus]

In response to the OP I will quote a song that I enjoy, mostly because that's all it deserves:

"Can't avoid that
evolution is fact.
We're all from the same Lucy
despite differences you see."

That is all

Semper Fi, carry on.

 

[gluadys]

People required larger brains in harsher terrains, ie the wintery north, so they evolved that way after they left Africa (according to the out of Africa theory). It is easier to live in the Africa than Europe. That is not racist, it's logic.

Incorrect. Large brains preceded the migration from Africa.

Some new fossils from Herto in Ethiopia, are the oldest known modern human fossils, at 160,000 yrs. The discoverers have assigned them to a new subspecies, Homo sapiens idaltu, and say that they are anatomically and chronologically intermediate between older archaic humans and more recent fully modern humans. Their age and anatomy is cited as strong evidence for the emergence of modern humans from Africa, and against the multiregional theory which argues that modern humans evolved in many places around the world.
Three skulls were found:

BOU-VP-16/1 is an almost complete adult cranium (shown at right). It is large and robust, with a cranial capacity estimated at 1450 cubic centimetres, larger than most modern humans. (emphasis added) http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/herto.html

 

[The Seeker]

Interesting little fact, when Darwin was travelling on the Beagle, he had an argument with the captain, Fitzroy, over slavery. Fitzroy was all for it, Darwin was morally opposed to slavery.

(aint Mark Steel grand )