• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Lotar

Swift Eagle Justice
Feb 27, 2003
8,163
445
45
Southern California
✟34,644.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
For just about the same amount of time Christians also believed slavery was okay, so what does that mean.

Find me an official Church document endorcing the practice of slavery.

The form of ethnically based, dehumanizing slavery that was became popular in western Europe and the Americas was imported from Islam, was foriegn to the early Church, and was absent in the Orthodox world.
 
Upvote 0

Lumen

Senior Member
Oct 16, 2006
1,065
32
35
✟16,405.00
Faith
Christian

Stop putting words into our mouths. Children are not inconvenient. I want very much to have children. But only when I'm stable in my marriage, financially, and mentally and am ready for children.

And you're wrong, in judaism most forms of contraception are perfectly acceptable.
 
Upvote 0

praying

Snazzy Title Goes Here
Site Supporter
Jan 9, 2004
32,648
1,608
68
New Jersey
✟108,540.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat


Why, what’s the point of that. The fact is for close to 1900 years Christians and by extension the church supported slavery. De facto support is as binding if not more so than any document, because de facto is actual practice.

Where it came from is irrelevant. And I suggest you thoroughly read about the treatment of slaves in the OT.

It was not a walk in the park to be slave.

At any rate this is off topic, my point was made.


You didn’t answer my question however regarding where in the Bible it clearly, unequivocally states that shall not use contraceptives.

[
 
Upvote 0

Lotar

Swift Eagle Justice
Feb 27, 2003
8,163
445
45
Southern California
✟34,644.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
In modern reformed Judaism, not orthodox and ultra-orthodox Judahism.
 
Upvote 0

Lotar

Swift Eagle Justice
Feb 27, 2003
8,163
445
45
Southern California
✟34,644.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Your point is not made. Slavery was never supported by the Church. Slavery in ancient times was much different than what slavery came to be in more recent times. Support for slavery, esp. in its later incarnation, was something generated in later times by only a subset of Christianity. Either way it is a stupid argument, since it falls under neither of the catagories of being universally held or an ancient doctrine.
 
Upvote 0

Lumen

Senior Member
Oct 16, 2006
1,065
32
35
✟16,405.00
Faith
Christian
Fine, could you please answer the where in the Bible question?


ETA; I have not read this thread so if it is here I have not seen it.

Here's his "proof":

 
Upvote 0

Lumen

Senior Member
Oct 16, 2006
1,065
32
35
✟16,405.00
Faith
Christian
Sorry thats a lot of reading please just highlight the one saying 'do not take contraception'.

This is always the main arguement:

"Gen. 38:8-10 - Onan is killed by God for practicing contraception (in this case, withdrawal) and spilling his sperm on the ground."

Of course they don't realize that God killed Onan not for practicing contraception, but because of his outright refusal to perform his duty to his brother's wife.

If this had been his own wife, the outcome would have been much different.

Listen to the way it's worded:

"But Onan knew the heir would not be his; and it came to pass, when he went in to his brother's wife, that he emitted on the ground, lest he should give an heir to his brother.
 
Upvote 0
W

WalkingforHim

Guest
Sorry thats a lot of reading please just highlight the one saying 'do not take contraception'.

There isn't one. That's our whole point. Cept he disagrees because his dogma demands it so he takes a whole buncha passages about multiplying and having kids and distorts it into "Don't ever use protection".

I'm curious, if a guy has AIDS, and he's married to his wife, been cheating, but that actually accepted in some parts of the world, like Africa. Anyway, he has AIDS, and wants have sex with his wife, or she wants to have sex with him, is it immoral to use a condom then?
 
Upvote 0

Nadiine

Well-Known Member
Apr 14, 2006
52,800
48,336
Obama: 53% deserve him ;)
✟292,219.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I don't have a 'dog in this fight' and have pretty much stayed out of it. I'm not familiar with the verses or arguments used.

But when I read your take on this verse you say is used to condemn contraception (or not having kids?), I think you have a real legitimate point.

The point wasn't that it went to the ground, the point is that he knew the heir wasn't going to be his (MOTIVE) and you're right, that is the brother's duty in the lineage.
(I think it's groas tho - imagine if there was NO attraction when this 'duty' had to be performed).

I think your point is very sound on motive for not performing his rightful duty.
I'm SO glad I didn't live in OT days.
 
Upvote 0
C

catlover

Guest

The "magic" answer is, the allegedly moral answer is: they should abstain from sex.

For some reason, because early church fathers were afraid of their phisiological responses to women, they put a taboo on sex...well...sex between a married couple isn't dirty, even if it doesn't involve making children.
 
Upvote 0

Lumen

Senior Member
Oct 16, 2006
1,065
32
35
✟16,405.00
Faith
Christian

And aren't we not supposed to withhold sex from our spouse? So if we use birth control we sin, if we abstain we sin, and if we have sex we might have a child that could put us in a very stressful financial situation.

See the illogicality?
 
Upvote 0

Lotar

Swift Eagle Justice
Feb 27, 2003
8,163
445
45
Southern California
✟34,644.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
And aren't we not supposed to withhold sex from our spouse? So if we use birth control we sin, if we abstain we sin, and if we have sex we might have a child that could put us in a very stressful financial situation.

See the illogicality?
No.

1.) It is only a sin to abstain if one spouse does not wish to.
2.) Trust in God. He will not give you more than you can handle; ie, either you won't get pregnant or He will provide.
 
Upvote 0

Lumen

Senior Member
Oct 16, 2006
1,065
32
35
✟16,405.00
Faith
Christian
^Then why are there so many families with more children than they can afford?

How do you explain this away I'm curious:

 
Upvote 0

Lotar

Swift Eagle Justice
Feb 27, 2003
8,163
445
45
Southern California
✟34,644.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
^Then why are there so many families with more children than they can afford?

Like who? Cannot afford, as in all the kids do not get their own cell phone, or as in the poor kids have to share a room?

How do you explain this away I'm curious:

Explain what away? His sin was two fold. If it was just because he would not give his brother a heir, then Judah would have suffered the same fate.
 
Upvote 0

Lumen

Senior Member
Oct 16, 2006
1,065
32
35
✟16,405.00
Faith
Christian

What are you talking about? What happened with Judah is nowhere near the same thing, it's not even the same situation.
 
Upvote 0

Chajara

iEdit
Jan 9, 2005
3,269
370
38
Milwaukee
Visit site
✟27,941.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Green
What about college, though? Okay, so the kids have to share a room and don't get cellphones or snazzy new shoes and stuff when they demand it. However, I wouldn't consider college a "selfish want" at all.

Personally, If I couldn't put a good $10,000 toward my kids' college education then I consider myself to have no business bringing another kid into the world until I could. Yeah, there are scholarships and loans and stuff but why rely on it? An education is one of the most important things there is.

Also, I see that you've all still ignored my question about birth control. Is it not as important because I went on it for hormonal reasons or something?
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.