Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
tulc(thinks "oh, yeah")I know Charlie talked about Bill Barr in his newsletter this morning. I want to talk about him, too.
But first, we have to start with some pro-wrestling talk.
The business of professional wrestling is almost directly descended from carnival work. And as with carnies (small hands!) wrestlers have their own language. Herewith is a very short primer:
Stark Contrasts Between the Mueller Report and Attorney General Barr's Summary | ACS"The AG who ran active disinformation on the president’s behalf in regard to the Mueller report..."
When did Barr do that?
or this:The actual text of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report tells a very different story than what was in summaries produced by Attorney General William Barr in letters to Congress and in a press conference prior to the report’s release. A comparison of the report and Barr’s statements shows that Barr downplayed Mueller’s findings about Russian contacts with Trump campaign associates as well as the damning evidence of the president’s obstruction of justice that Mueller assembled. Following are examples of this gap.
or here:Whether or not Mueller was intentionally trying to correct the record, the differences between what he and Barr said are, in many cases, stark. Some of the differences involve near complete contradictions—in other words Mueller’s statement and Barr’s statements cannot both be true. Other differences are more a matter of emphasis or tone (e.g., references to the threat posed by the Russian operations, descriptions of the qualities of the special counsel staff).
tulc(hopes that helps)During his four-hour back and forth with senators on Wednesday, Attorney General William Barr questioned, and at times seemed to contradict, key findings in special counsel Robert Mueller's report.
Time and again, faced with questions from probing Senate Judiciary Committee Democrats about the report's contents, Barr also seemed unfamiliar with some of the report's significant details.
Of course the left is going to characterize disagreement with them as disinformation.
So that would be, "I can't actually show where they're wrong, but don't agree with what they say."?That is all petty wordsmithing.
Ahhh! Your argument seems to be: "They're "leftist" and that's why what they say is wrong." Even though they supply many examples of where AG Barr said one thing but the report he was supposed to be summarizing said something different. That's what's called an ad hominem fallacy: you're attacking the person, not refuting the argument.Of course the left is going to characterize disagreement with them as disinformation.
...I don't remember Jesus or the Pharisees being mentioned in the OP, could you point out where that part was?Jesus contradicted the Pharisees. Does that make him wrong?
The Pharisees (Israel's elitists) wanted to 'impeach' Jesus as soon as He 'took office' just because He opposed their agenda. Human nature hasn't changed one bit
It's understandable that you would confuse the issue with the party. During these past three years, deception and misguidance have become the lefts's modus operandi. This is why so many independents and Democrats are leaving the party.Ahhh! Your argument seems to be: "They're "leftist" and that's why what they say is wrong." Even though they supply many examples of where AG Barr said one thing but the report he was supposed to be summarizing said something different. That's what's called an ad hominem fallacy: you're attacking the person, not refuting the argument.
...I don't remember Jesus or the Pharisees being mentioned in the OP, could you point out where that part was?
tulc(wonders if this was posted in the wrong thread?)
Still can't refute the argument huh? Not unexpected, it seems to be the pattern for these threads, someone posts facts that prove something, and then people try and make the discussion about something else instead. Not hard to see why that happens, it's not like President Trump or his administration gives his supporters much to work with.It's understandable that you would confuse the issue with the party. During these past three years, deception and misguidance have become the lefts's modus operandi. This is why so many independents and Democrats are leaving the party.
You're right. The droves of people that are abandoning the Democratic party and rallying around Trump weren't worthy of the Elitists anyway.Not hard to see why that happens, it's not like President Trump or his administration gives his supporters much to work with.
Still trying to change the subject huh?You're right. The droves of people that are abandoning the Democratic party and rallying around Trump weren't worthy of the Elitists anyway.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?